Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recruits' Ineligibility Tests the Military
The Wall Street Journal ^ | June 27, 2014 | Miriam Jordan

Posted on 07/03/2014 5:46:51 AM PDT by KeyLargo

U.S. News

Recruits' Ineligibility Tests the Military

More Than Two-Thirds of American Youth Wouldn't Qualify for Service, Pentagon Says By Miriam Jordan

June 27, 2014

More than two-thirds of America's youth would fail to qualify for military service because of physical, behavioral or educational shortcomings, posing challenges to building the next generation of soldiers even as the U.S. draws down troops from conflict zones.

The military deems many youngsters ineligible due to obesity, lack of a high-school diploma, felony convictions and prescription-drug use for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. But others are now also running afoul of standards for appearance amid the growing popularity of large-scale tattoos and devices called ear gauges that create large holes in earlobes.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: military; obesity; recruits; rejected
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Brittany Crippen, from Fort Worth, Texas, was disqualified because of a tattoo on the back of her neck. Mei-Chun Jau for The Wall Street Journal


1 posted on 07/03/2014 5:46:51 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Dumbass tattoo anyways. All it tells me is she wanted to have something for the multitude to look at during...certain moments.


2 posted on 07/03/2014 5:49:07 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Welcome to Obama’s new military. Boy we are headed straight down the path that Rome took before she fell except we have taken it one step farther. We have a leader who is a planted foreign agent and wrecking ball that is intentionally wreaking havoc on our nation from within.


3 posted on 07/03/2014 5:52:30 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

church ?


4 posted on 07/03/2014 5:54:23 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Brittany Crippen ... was disqualified because of a tattoo on the back of her neck.
Why doesn't she just have it removed?
5 posted on 07/03/2014 5:55:23 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

“Ms. Crippen, meanwhile, said she was still considering whether to remove her fish tattoo, the only one of four tattoos she has that is problematic. “My parents said they’ll pay for it, but right now I really don’t know what I’ll do,” she said. “My tattoo isn’t offensive.”


6 posted on 07/03/2014 6:00:11 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Now let me guess, the next thing that we are going to hear is that they want to use more illegal aliens instead, and “our” military will consistent of mostly foreigners, with no loyalty or sympathy with the American people.


7 posted on 07/03/2014 6:04:35 AM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

” Most young Americans are ineligible to join the military, either because they’re drug users, obese, medically unfit, failed to graduate high school, or have criminal records. The Pentagon estimates that only 25 percent are qualified.

“There are 30-some million 17- to 24-year-olds out there, but by the time you get all the way down to those that are qualified, you’re down to less than a million young Americans,” said Maj. Gen. Mark Brilakis, the commander of Marine Corps Recruiting Command, told Federal News Radio.”

http://rt.com/usa/158992-military-80-percent-rejection-rate/


8 posted on 07/03/2014 6:07:05 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

9 posted on 07/03/2014 6:10:01 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
About 6 years ago our nephew was recruiting for the Marines, his big problems were marijuana and mothers.

:)Apparently things have gotten worse.

10 posted on 07/03/2014 6:13:09 AM PDT by defconw (LUTFA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: defconw

11 posted on 07/03/2014 6:21:06 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Yep! Not really comfortable with the new “Battle Buddy”, thing either. At least not the terminology.


12 posted on 07/03/2014 6:24:38 AM PDT by defconw (LUTFA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
she said. “My tattoo isn’t offensive.”

Uh, it is if one is offended by stoopid. Which I am.

13 posted on 07/03/2014 6:25:17 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

The kids may have holes in their ear lobes, but our admirals and generals have holes in their heads.


14 posted on 07/03/2014 6:31:11 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green

You got it.


15 posted on 07/03/2014 6:36:24 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Apologetic recruiters encouraged her to return after removing the tattoo, a process she was told would take about year. "I was very upset," Ms. Crippen said.

Well, that settles it. We can't Ms. Crippen's feelings hurt. What kind of Army do we have if we can't protect our soldier's feelings?

How would you like to be in combat with Ms. Crippen when her hurt feelings impair her ability to do her job?

Nevermind the fact that the Army bans tattoos because they endanger soldiers by making them easy to identify.

16 posted on 07/03/2014 6:38:01 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

“prescription-drug use for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder”

If the schools and social workers had their way, that would be every boy in the country.


17 posted on 07/03/2014 6:39:35 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

“Dumbass tattoo anyways. All it tells me is she wanted to have something for the multitude to look at during...certain moments.”

The military is chock full of that type of female. Not all of them, but a lot.

The policy on tattoos, piercings, and so on may also be about more than just appearance. I’ve seen a lot of youngsters these days with all that, and social media addiction that seem to be just screaming for attention, or have other issues. The military doesn’t need people like that.


18 posted on 07/03/2014 6:39:58 AM PDT by Antihero101607
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

If I recall correctly when the draft started in 1940 something like two-thirds were excempted for a variety of reasons as well. But war is a great equalizer and by 1945 things that would have disqualified someone in 1940 weren’t even looked at. I imagine if a draft were necessary now then these tattoos and criminal records and body piercings would be ignored.


19 posted on 07/03/2014 6:40:29 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Welcome to Obama’s new military. Boy we are headed straight down the path that Rome took before she fell except we have taken it one step farther. We have a leader who is a planted foreign agent and wrecking ball that is intentionally wreaking havoc on our nation from within.

OK so you're saying that by not taking people with tattoos and arrest records and drug use Obama's ruining the military?

20 posted on 07/03/2014 6:41:48 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson