Skip to comments.
Obama To Overrule Supreme Court? President Considers "Mitigating" Obamacare Ruling
zero hedge ^
| 6/30/14
| Tyler Durden
Posted on 06/30/2014 12:12:40 PM PDT by Nachum
Having had his omnipotence chipped away at last week, President Obama has - seemingly - been pushed too far by the Supreme Court's decision on contraception and Obamacare this morning: The White House stated...
- SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CONTRACEPTION COVERAGE JEOPARDIZES HEALTH OF WOMEN EMPLOYED BY THESE COMPANIES
- WILL WORK WITH CONGRESS TO MAKE SURE WOMEN AFFECTED BY RULING WILL HAVE SAME ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION
- WILL CONSIDER WHETHER PRESIDENT CAN ACT ON HIS OWN TO MITIGATE EFFECT OF SUPREME COURT RULING
Totalitarian? You decide... One wonders if the phrase "do you know who I am?" was uttered this morning?
As The Hill adds,
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said women should be able to "make personal health decisions for themselves, and called contraception "vital" to the health and well-being of women.
...
"We will, of course, respect the Supreme Court ruling, he added.
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bo; court; hobbylobbydecision; obama; obamadoubledown; obamalawless; overrule; scotus; supreme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
King Obamatron is not amused
1
posted on
06/30/2014 12:12:40 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
2
posted on
06/30/2014 12:13:23 PM PDT
by
erod
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
3
posted on
06/30/2014 12:13:35 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: kingattax
Here it is. It didn’t take long.
4
posted on
06/30/2014 12:13:38 PM PDT
by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: Nachum
“Borrowing” a little more power is he?
5
posted on
06/30/2014 12:14:16 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Nachum
Consequence free recreational sex is “vital” to women’s health? Puuuleeez.
To: Nachum
“Override the Supreme Court”??
Wouldn’t he need both houses of Congress to do that?
7
posted on
06/30/2014 12:14:45 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Nachum
Up to now he has been doing whatever he wanted. He doesn’t respect the Constitution. Never did. Hates this country.
But it’s fun to see him mad.
8
posted on
06/30/2014 12:14:56 PM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: Nachum
Well, he’s on the air right now saying he is going to “mitigate” immigration!
9
posted on
06/30/2014 12:15:05 PM PDT
by
djf
(OK. Well, now, lemme try to make this clear: If you LIKE your lasagna, you can KEEP your lasagna!)
To: Nachum
I said this on a thread earlier. Why wouldn’t he just ignore the ruling?
To: Nachum
How dare the Supreme Court mock the low to no information voters’ “messiah”? He’s the boy king! That’s child abuse! hrumpf! hrumpf! I’d like to see the Supreme Court shove that phone and pen up his ...!
11
posted on
06/30/2014 12:16:19 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
To: Nachum
“Will respect the SCOTUS ruling” meaning that we can choose to ignore it ....
12
posted on
06/30/2014 12:17:53 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
(If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read newspapers you are misinformed)
To: Nachum
“........White House press secretary Josh Earnest said women should be able to “make personal health decisions for themselves,.....”
AND THE REST OF US DON’T!!!!
FUBO
13
posted on
06/30/2014 12:18:02 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: Nachum
I actually predicted this, but I thought I was joking.
14
posted on
06/30/2014 12:18:07 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Nachum
"So it is written! So it SHALL be done!"
15
posted on
06/30/2014 12:18:46 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Nachum
Obama and the Dems are presenting this as a ban on contraceptives. We have to battle this perception and remind people that contraceptives are STILL available and can STILL be purchased. Women just wont be able to force their employer to pay for them through the company health care plan.
To: djf
does he know what that word means?
17
posted on
06/30/2014 12:19:21 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Nachum
Obama has had over 12 US Supreme Court decisions against him which is unprecedented for any President in US history!
18
posted on
06/30/2014 12:19:23 PM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Nachum
This thought has occurred to me more than once:
What if The Kenyan simply decides to crush any and all private insurance carriers who refuse to offer contraceptive care?
Hobby Lobby wants to exclude abortificants from its group insurance? Too bad. It might be legal, but the tax penalties for those companies sent them into bankruptcy.
Or compliance with ObamaCare rules.
19
posted on
06/30/2014 12:19:29 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: erod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson