Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama To Overrule Supreme Court? President Considers "Mitigating" Obamacare Ruling
zero hedge ^ | 6/30/14 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 06/30/2014 12:12:40 PM PDT by Nachum

Having had his omnipotence chipped away at last week, President Obama has - seemingly - been pushed too far by the Supreme Court's decision on contraception and Obamacare this morning: The White House stated...

Totalitarian? You decide... One wonders if the phrase "do you know who I am?" was uttered this morning?

 

As The Hill adds,

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said women should be able to "make personal health decisions for themselves,” and called contraception "vital" to the health and well-being of women.

 

...

 

"We will, of course, respect the Supreme Court ruling,” he added.


(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bo; court; hobbylobbydecision; obama; obamadoubledown; obamalawless; overrule; scotus; supreme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
King Obamatron is not amused
1 posted on 06/30/2014 12:12:40 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’s good to be king.


2 posted on 06/30/2014 12:13:23 PM PDT by erod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


3 posted on 06/30/2014 12:13:35 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Here it is. It didn’t take long.


4 posted on 06/30/2014 12:13:38 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Borrowing” a little more power is he?


5 posted on 06/30/2014 12:14:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Consequence free recreational sex is “vital” to women’s health? Puuuleeez.


6 posted on 06/30/2014 12:14:27 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Override the Supreme Court”??

Wouldn’t he need both houses of Congress to do that?


7 posted on 06/30/2014 12:14:45 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Up to now he has been doing whatever he wanted. He doesn’t respect the Constitution. Never did. Hates this country.

But it’s fun to see him mad.


8 posted on 06/30/2014 12:14:56 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well, he’s on the air right now saying he is going to “mitigate” immigration!


9 posted on 06/30/2014 12:15:05 PM PDT by djf (OK. Well, now, lemme try to make this clear: If you LIKE your lasagna, you can KEEP your lasagna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I said this on a thread earlier. Why wouldn’t he just ignore the ruling?


10 posted on 06/30/2014 12:15:53 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

How dare the Supreme Court mock the low to no information voters’ “messiah”? He’s the boy king! That’s child abuse! hrumpf! hrumpf! I’d like to see the Supreme Court shove that phone and pen up his ...!


11 posted on 06/30/2014 12:16:19 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Will respect the SCOTUS ruling” meaning that we can choose to ignore it ....


12 posted on 06/30/2014 12:17:53 PM PDT by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read newspapers you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“........White House press secretary Josh Earnest said women should be able to “make personal health decisions for themselves,”.....”

AND THE REST OF US DON’T!!!!

FUBO


13 posted on 06/30/2014 12:18:02 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I actually predicted this, but I thought I was joking.
14 posted on 06/30/2014 12:18:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

"So it is written! So it SHALL be done!"
15 posted on 06/30/2014 12:18:46 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama and the Dems are presenting this as a ban on contraceptives. We have to battle this perception and remind people that contraceptives are STILL available and can STILL be purchased. Women just wont be able to force their employer to pay for them through the company health care plan.


16 posted on 06/30/2014 12:18:56 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

does he know what that word means?


17 posted on 06/30/2014 12:19:21 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama has had over 12 US Supreme Court decisions against him which is unprecedented for any President in US history!


18 posted on 06/30/2014 12:19:23 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This thought has occurred to me more than once:

What if The Kenyan simply decides to crush any and all private insurance carriers who refuse to offer contraceptive care?

Hobby Lobby wants to exclude abortificants from its group insurance? Too bad. It might be legal, but the tax penalties for those companies sent them into bankruptcy.

Or compliance with ObamaCare rules.


19 posted on 06/30/2014 12:19:29 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erod
king3
20 posted on 06/30/2014 12:20:19 PM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson