Posted on 01/15/2014 2:45:20 PM PST by grimalkin
People often ask today: if the Fed has created so much new money, why hasn’t it produced more inflation?
When the Fed creates masses of new money, it initially flows to Wall Street, which profits from it in a variety of imaginative ways, but from there its path is unpredictable.
The Fed inserted into the TARP bill in 2008 the authority to pay interest on bank reserves. Of course this interest is paid by creating even more new money, but it provides an incentive for banks to leave reserves idle.
On the other hand, the reserves are not as idle as they look. For example, they support derivatives activity. The total amount of derivatives held by the top four US banks is estimated at the moment to be $217 trillion. And keep in mind that it was derivatives exposure that brought Lehman Brothers down in 2008.
To the degree that the new money does get out into the economy, it will flow in different directions and have different effects. If it reaches the average consumer, it will produce consumer price inflation. This does seem to be happening. Consumer price inflation calculated as it was in the past would be much higher than today’s reported 1%.
If the new money reaches rich people, it will drive up the prices of what rich people buy. We see this today when a single townhouse in Manhattan is listed for over $100 million. If it flows into the stock market, it will raise stock prices. If enough flows in this direction, it will create an asset bubble, which seems to be happening once again today. Asset bubbles are followed by crashes, which in turn bring recession and unemployment.
Wherever the new money flows, it may increase demand in the short run, only to reduce it in the long run. This is because the new money created by the Fed is not just given away. It is made available to banks to lend, which means that it enters the economy as debt. A little debt, especially if spent or invested wisely, may help an economy. But too much will strangle it.
As consumers, businesses, and governments become weighed down with more and more debt from the past, especially debt that was spent unwisely, the interest and principal payments become increasingly burdensome. Dollars that might have been spent on new investments with the potential to create new jobs and new income are instead siphoned off to pay for past mistakes. We end up with a zombie economy, still breathing, but just barely.
Historically we can measure how many dollars of economic growth we get from each new dollar of debt. At the moment, it seems to be negative. In other words, more new debt makes it worse, not better.
Despite this plain evidence, the Fed continues to try to persuade consumers and businesses to increase their borrowing and spending and also underwrites government borrowing and spending. It holds interest rates very low, which for now keeps the debt house of cards from tumbling down.
Will the Fed’s feckless money creation end in inflation or depression? It could go either way, which is potentially confusing. Insofar as it stokes demand, it could lead to inflation. Insofar as it increases an already too heavy debt burden, it could lead instead to recession, joblessness, and depression. Or it could lead first to the one and then to the other.
It could also lead to a third possibility: stagflation. In this scenario, consumer prices advance even while unemployment increases. We had this in the 1970’s. If we measured inflation as we did in the 1970’s, it would be apparent that this already exists today.
Food, ammo and fuel.
A third grader could have written this article?
And stay away from the cities.
Author hasn’t priced building materials lately.
There’s inflation. But jobs have gone to hell, so there is less money available to buy things, which keeps prices lower than the feds are trying to make them.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/166850/americans-worse-off-financially-year-ago.aspx
Food, ammo and fuel.
And health, exercise and nutrition.
The article doesn’t discuss velocity of money. As in businesses and peoples hoarding cash or not spending because of the certainty that this isn’t going to end well. The only ‘Uncertainty’ is what the end will look like. Just mho.
I’m doing my part to keep prices as low as possible.
Just because the imperial federal government calls no or minimal inflation does not mean anything.
They would tell you the sun is shining, it's warm and everything is good while they're getting drowned in rain and buried in snow.
Shoes. Shoes have gone up. Some shoes have gone up 100%.
Don’t forget taxes.
Taxes never cease to rise while services I receive continue to drop.
No. The Austrian school doesn't use that term. The Austrians do consider important the effects of the demand to hold money which is implicit in the article's statements.
Wherever the new money flows, it may increase demand in the short run
If the Fed is unsuccessful in spurring demand, that is because the demand for money has increased.
Where is inflation? Just go to the supermarket. A carton of eggs that cost 2.00 last October now costs 3.50. Last October 100.00 worth of groceries could feed a family of three for a week. Today it will feed a family if three for about four days, unless you want to live on beans & rice. Just look at what happened to the price of peanut butter in just a short while. If you haven’t stocked up by now, then it’s too late.
You speak truth there.
And fees. I look at my utility and technology bills every month and the fees, taxes, new costs for environmental things, etc and it's insane. They seem to go up every month.
Fees.
“They *&ok you at the Drive-Thru.”
“Lethal Weapon 2”
Our inflation numbers are like the funhouse numbers we get for employment.
As an example, if your sugar costs the same as it did four years ago, is it the same price? Well, no. If you haven’t noticed, your 5 pound bag of sugar now weighs 4 POUNDS, a 20% difference. Only now that same short weight 4 pounder is also going up on ITS shelf price.
Ice cream no longer comes in a standard half-gallon container, and your peanut butter jars and cereal boxes have also shrunk. I only mention these because they are some of the more commonly purchased items.
So someone has been playing hide-the-ball with REAL inflation figures, and its been going on right in front of us. I just wonder at what point this disguised real inflation begins to affect interest rates.
I don't understand this statement. I'm an average schmuck and my salary probably increases each year maybe 2-3% depending on bonus results. So I don't see that this "new money" flowed to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.