FYI, some of my thoughts on this entire episode.
There is no plausible evidence contrary to these conclusions.
That is a very good review of the whole episode.
Aside from the sweetness of the verdict on an obviously not guilty Zimmerman, the best result of the verdict is the volcano of exploding-headed, white-hating, vicious, f-word spewing, 70 IQ, illiterate, vomiting of nastiness on DumpsterUnderground.com. It could have been improved only if the verdict had been issued in cursive.
If he and/or his lawyer are smart, they are monitoring the talking heads and noting the exact time (and who) says “he did it, I don’t care what the verdict is.”
Then start file a separate slander case for each utterance.
Easier for written articles, but they should make sure they catch authored (RL named) blogs, which don’t go through editors.
Homey wanna play court games, homey gonna get court games.
Excellent.
Nice comments and observations Jeff. Good job.
The real problem is we are dealing with a group who are most concerned about achieving their desired outcomes in virtually all aspects of their lives irrespective of the inputs and will utilize all avenues whether illegal, unethical or immoral to do so.
Those of us who trust the truth eventually comes out are thankful it did and that the jury acted justly on the facts presented to them.
But the truth will continue to be discarded by those who wish to further they hatred agendas. A perfect example of this is so very evident at the following link.
God Bless George Zimmerman's brother Robert for his courage, honesty and determination in defense of George and the truth!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PIdwu3gHXy4
That is an excellent summary of events. This was a political show trial and nothing more. Fortunately the defense was solid and the jury followed the law not the prescribed political outcome.
No dog in this fight shy of justice vs mob rule and polidiots and presstitutes pandering to the race card throwers. This BS should have never passed a grand jury that would have been no billed the case as presented by the local police.
Listened to Zimmermans brother smack down Piers Morgan in a very clean and professional manner. That man needs his own show IMO.
He’s a calm, intelligent thinker. I say such without knowing his politics. That was how impressed I was with Robert Zimmermans rebuttal to all the myths and fabricated BS the polidiots spewed to the public.
The Paula Deens and the George Zimmermans got a taste or what they voted for recently.
Voters take note. America’s infrastructure is broke. Not real sure it can ever be repaired.
My opinion..... Stay safe !
The correct wording is 100% INNOCENT.
The prosecution did not have a shred of evidence to the contrary.
Ditto...
Hope you are well, my friend...
This case puts beyond all doubt that the Liberal Media are nothing more than propagandists. Thank goodness the ladies on the jury were able to see the truth.
Outstanding commentary; it might have served as a closing argument for the defense!
Simple question. .who through the first punch..and the second. .and the third...ect...ect...ect...
Up till the the trigger was pulled..what crime had Zimmerman done on Martin?. ..what crime had Martin done on Zimmerman?...if no gun what crime happen..assault on Zimmerman by Martin..or assault on Martin by Zimmerman?
Because befor the trigger was pulled..there was a crime in progress and the gun stopped it...so what was the crime in progress the gunshot stopped?
It a rhetoric question..the answer is Martin was assaulting Zimmerman. ..
FR needs a “like” button.
In the recruit school, we were given a combat situation with the Aggressors (RA troops) surprising us, ordering us to yield our rifles. The lesson was on the part of the Code of Conduct "I will never surrender while I have the means to resist." I refused, and it took 7 Aggressors, three down with butt-swipes and one kneed Aggressor officer, to get me down and bound. I almost got court-martialed, but finally was given a commendation in my DA201 jacket.
Considering Trayvon of about the same size and strength, George, in his size and shape, did not have a chance against such a deadly attack. A different angle and method of blow could have driven George's nasal bone directly back into his brain and killed him on the spot. A young, strong man, fit for Army service and armed with nothing but some martial training and surprise, is about as deadly as one can get in an unequal fight without Marquis of Queensbury rules.
There is no doubt in my mind after seeing the results that Trayvon Martin got exactly the reward he deserved for attacking another citizen with such determination and malice, and for abandoning any kind of respect for a community adult resident.
It is beyond likelihood that had not George been armed, he would be dead, and Martin would now be being tried for premeditated murder with malice aforethought, based on his actions and the cell phone records.
Any misled supporter of Martin, his behavior, and his shenannigans of record, is criminal-minded themselves, and despicable, IMHO. And that could be some little old granny who is willing to submit to the duplicity of the purveyors of race terrorism, demonstrations, and riots.