Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's coming civil war -- makers vs. takers
Fox News ^ | Published July 12, 2012 | Arthur Herman

Posted on 11/07/2012 3:51:00 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

“A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

Abe Lincoln used those words in 1858 to describe a country that was careening toward civil war. Now we’re a house divided again and another civil war is coming, with the 2012 election as its Gettysburg.

Call it America’s coming civil war between the Makers and the Takers.

On one side are those who create wealth, America’s private sector–the very ones targeted by President Obama’s tax hikes announced Monday.

On the other are the public employee unions; left-leaning intelligentsia who see the growth of government as index of progress; and the millions of Americans now dependent on government through a growing network of government transfer payments, from Medicaid and Social Security to college loans and corporate bailouts and handouts (think GM and Solyndra).

Over the past century America’s private sector has been the source of productivity, innovation, creativity, and growth–and gave us the iPhone and iPad. The public sector has been the engine of entitlement, stagnation, and decline -- and gave us Detroit and the South Bronx.

The private sector built the strongest economy in the world. It armed the free world in World War Two, and then in the three decades after the war turned America into the most prosperous society history had ever seen. It revived America in the Reagan and Clinton years, and thanks to the Bush tax cuts brought this country back from economic collapse after 9/11.

In those same years a growing public sector, by contrast, turned Europe into a cesspool of debt, stalled economies, and chronic social dysfunction that’s set the streets of Athens -- and perhaps other European capitals--on fire.

That’s where we’re headed, too, more rapidly than we like to think.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; civilwar; cw2; cwii; cwiiping; democrats; govtabuse; liberalfascism; liberalism; liberals; obama; obamavoters; progressives; shtf; socialism; socialistdemocrats; tyranny; waronliberty; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-229 next last
To: little jeremiah
Why can’t a civil war happen?

It could happen. I am certainly not all knowing about our future. I used to be a person that believed that it would happen, however I left that reservation a long time ago.

141 posted on 11/07/2012 11:27:35 PM PST by Ajnin (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnocet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Thinking doesn’t come easy, does it!

For you, apparently not. The dynamics (fortunately) of mid-term elections are entirely different from Presidential years. Eventually, we're going to start losing those as well; especially if we continue to delude ourselves that we're being defrauded.

We're not.

We lost.

We've got problems.

All of the educational, entertainment, and cultural institutions have been beating a constant drumbeat against our cause for over 50 years. Many of our so-called "mainstream" religious institutions are failing as well. The Roman Church got itself behind 0bamacare, and now, though supposedly horrified at the result, still can't muster the moral courage to refuse the Blessed Sacrament to de facto excommunicants like Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Kathleen Sebelius, and many others. 1 out of 9 people who were Christians in the last generation are not Christians in the current generation of Americans.

It's taking it's toll, and we've allowed the occasional triumph, like 2010, to lull us into to believing that we're "winning." We aren't.

And by the way, I'm still waiting for some actual evidence.

Backing up crazy conspiracy theories doesn't come easy, does it!?

142 posted on 11/07/2012 11:37:10 PM PST by FredZarguna (I'm sorry, General Washington. We owed you and the men at Valley Forge so much more than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I don’t see enough support, organization and expertise for another civil war. What I do see is, on going low level violence that replicates the third world.


143 posted on 11/07/2012 11:42:20 PM PST by Ajnin (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnocet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
I don't hate you at all. Like me, you live in a state where about 90% of the area of the state is farming or woodland, but whose politics are dominated by one giant city. I have the same deal.

The problem with the analysis that CA and NY and some other states are "donor" states is that it simply draws a huge line around the border and says "here is the money collected in Federal Taxes," [that part is easy enough to delineate, but it's also not quite the whole story, read on.] It then says, here is how much money comes back in through these lines from the Federal government, and A - B is > 0, therefore we are a donor state.

It does not consider that a substantially larger amount of our national defense is geared toward protecting New York City. It does not correctly pro-rate the fact that high population states have to amortize the defense costs over larger numbers to begin with, it does not account for the fact that Eastern States like ours, and even Kali, which was settled early, derive enormous benefit by stealing huge amounts of hidden money from people in WY, MT, AK, ND, SD, ... because of the benefits their public lands accrues to us, and is lost to the people of those states.

I'm not even going to get into the disproportionately higher hidden costs of regulation that people in low-density agricultural areas bear for the sake of those of us in high-water, high fertility farming states, that is my bailiwick since I got out of Academia and it would bore you to tears.

Here are two other examples: Southern States have disproportionately large numbers of veterans. Now, I don't know about you, but I do not believe the Federal money going back to our veterans comes anywhere close to paying them back for what they've done for us. But even if it did, it would still not be NY money that was going to, say SC. It would be US money, going to US veterans who happen to live where they were born. How do you correctly amortize the flux of money into SC to account for that? What did the veteran "pay?" It was paid in red, not green.

One more example: Any state with a median age over the US median age will suck a huge amount more money from the Federal coffers than a "young" state like UT. Does that mean that the state is a "taker" state? In PA, it doesn't, because most of the people getting old age benefits here were also born here. But on the other hand, can we seriously argue that is true even in the case of FL where most people are transplants? After all, the money Floridians are currently drawing from entitlements was contributed in other states decades ago.

Finally, just to touch on my original example. Do you really want Federal contracts to flow back to high cost-of-living states like NY? One of the biggest cost problems we have right now is that an enormous amount of Federal money is spent close to Washington, DC. As a result of that, NoVA has become an extremely expensive place to live, and the costs of contractors in NoVA and MD has skyrocketed in the last 40 years. We actually should flow that money to low cost of living states in the Mid-West. You could hire an engineer in KA for 1/2 of what it costs in Northern Virginia, and he would be able to maintain the same standard of living on 1/2 the money -- and a whole lot better quality of life.

But of course, liberal economists working for the NY Times would accuse Kansas of being a "taker" state if we did that. Well, screw them. I'm the employer and I want more engineers for my $.

So, my point is this. Liberals like to look at a very oversimplified economic model of revenue and return, and then claim that overpopulated liberal states are net contributors. It's not that simple. I was a physicist in a former life, and this isn't an energy flow where you can just draw a circle around a system and talk about the thermodynamics of heat going in, coming out, and the internal energy or state variable changes as a result. It's political sophistry to believe you can. That's why liberals do it. They want to believe that their regulatory, high-tax, welfare state policies, which force companies to pay their employees more money to live in their hell-holes entitle them to "bragging rights." They don't. They simply make the products and services they sell more expensive for those of us who have to buy them, and if we live outside of those states, that makes them "free enterprise TAKERS." Please, let's not go there. It's a place conservatives don't belong.

144 posted on 11/08/2012 12:13:44 AM PST by FredZarguna (I'm sorry, General Washington. We owed you and the men at Valley Forge so much more than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
I'm not a paleo, and I think Pat is wrong about 50% of the time. But this is a well-reasoned article. It's about the industrialized world, not the third world, and our demise is going to be more like the examples he gives here:

http://www.creators.com/opinion/pat-buchanan/is-belgium-breaking-up.html At some point, the US will a) become ungovernable, b) become despotic or c) coalesce around semi-autonomous regions. I believe it will be (c). Have a read.

145 posted on 11/08/2012 12:23:58 AM PST by FredZarguna (I'm sorry, General Washington. We owed you and the men at Valley Forge so much more than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Bump to the top....


146 posted on 11/08/2012 2:46:01 AM PST by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Bump to the top....


147 posted on 11/08/2012 2:46:01 AM PST by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Bump to the top....


148 posted on 11/08/2012 2:46:06 AM PST by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Government will grow exponentially for the forseeable future.

Unless you define "forseeable future" as "a few years", that's mathematically impossible.

149 posted on 11/08/2012 4:54:15 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
I have been hearing this bullshit for that last 20 years and guess what...no Civil War II.

Calhoun was talking secession in the 1830s. Even then, the formation of the Confederacy and the bills of secession were not something which just popped up overnight, it had been brewing for decades before it happened.

Similarly, the grumblings of colonists against the King of England went on for a while before things came to a head.

In both cases, the powder keg had been charged for decades before the spark ignited war.

Don't let your normalcy bias blind you to history. Human nature does not change that much.

150 posted on 11/08/2012 6:13:56 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

You’ve no problems at all.Your simple deluded mind is at peace with whatever is dished out to you.

That’s probably a good thing for you, since you lack the cognition, and the moral outrage required to establish an effective plan, or even a desire, to deal effectively with the situation.

Just go back to sleep.


151 posted on 11/08/2012 6:29:23 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

My Father-in-law’s place had two ponds on it. It was on the west side of Double Bluff,near a hump in the road, just a short distance from the maim highway (525?).

The ponds were at the west end of the property, down lower than the house.


152 posted on 11/08/2012 6:37:13 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

How far do you think you can “forsee?”

Let’s say at least two decades, and it is quite possible.


153 posted on 11/08/2012 6:40:38 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin

Sick huh? Enjoy your socialist utopia troll.


154 posted on 11/08/2012 6:43:14 AM PST by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

Do you remember a girl named Kathleen Kolweiss that worked at the building supply store on the south side of the highway, just a few miles east of Double Bluff?


155 posted on 11/08/2012 6:47:46 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Medicare’s been growing at 9% annually (doubling every eight years) since 1980.

It was $50 billion then.

This year it’s $800 billion.

Eight years from now that trend points to $1600 billion.

Eight years from then it’ll be $3200 billion.

That’s the entirety of this year’s Federal budget. Just for Medicare.

How long do you think that sort of thing is possible?


156 posted on 11/08/2012 7:32:37 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt; All

In other words, you would follow orders to attack Americans. Good to know.


157 posted on 11/08/2012 9:07:07 AM PST by CodeToad (Padme: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

One would have to be able to quantify future revenues to answer your question, but based on the slope of the production curve for natural gas, it could go on for a few decades.

That is not an advocation of the process,its just the way it is shaping up.


158 posted on 11/08/2012 9:39:54 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

In other words, ya got bupkis.


159 posted on 11/08/2012 9:40:26 AM PST by FredZarguna (I'm sorry, General Washington. We owed you and the men at Valley Forge so much more than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; Vermont Lt

Looks like you’re getting to know Vermont Lt.

Many have had his number since the day he showed up.

He’s a real piece of work.


160 posted on 11/08/2012 9:43:05 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson