Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should we have some criteria to be a voter?
5/24/12

Posted on 05/24/2012 4:40:20 AM PDT by bestintxas

While I voted in the primary yesterday, I saw one women come up to the booth, look at the machine display for awhile, then turn around and asked the monitor

"Don't they have a straight-party ticket here?"

The monitor had to explain to her that this was a primary only on who from each party should be on the November ballot.

My question is simple:

Should some imbecile like that even be allowed to vote?

No wonder we have Obama as President, when idiots show up knowing nothing about why they are even there.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: bestintxas

Heinlein’s ‘Starship Troopers’ had an interesting take on it.


21 posted on 05/24/2012 5:28:51 AM PDT by ebshumidors ( Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

I’d like to point out that the original post does not mention party; and that there is no need to mention party, since it is painfully obvious (and this reply continues in that vein).

One party is the party of the “party line”, from top to bottom, and promotes agenda-voting, talking points, what-can-my-party-do-for-me, voting based on emotion...

The other party is for the most part, the opposite to that.


22 posted on 05/24/2012 5:30:50 AM PDT by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

YES,you should know the difference between s*** and shineola!


23 posted on 05/24/2012 5:31:58 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
Why hold the voters to account?

We don't hold our highest office to any!

24 posted on 05/24/2012 5:34:07 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteelToe

“I believe owning real property (land, house, trailer, condo, etc.) should be a requirement for voting.”
__________________________________________________

I think most FReepers assume that you are being quite sarcastic, but the post is not even funny.


25 posted on 05/24/2012 5:41:04 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Besides the trailer, all the rest are real property, and I don’t think he’s being sarcastic at all. I agree - unless you own property and pay taxes, or serve in defense of the country, you should not vote.


26 posted on 05/24/2012 5:43:22 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Simplest requirement: be a net payer into the system. If you get more over the course of a year than you put in then you get to participate from the couch.


27 posted on 05/24/2012 5:44:57 AM PDT by TheZMan (Obama is without a doubt the worst President ever elected to these United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteelToe
"I believe owning real property (land, house, trailer, condo, etc.) should be a requirement for voting. When you own real property you have a stake in your community..."

So soldiers and their families who live in on-post housing and honorably discharged veterans who rent an apartment don't have enough of a stake in their communities to vote?

28 posted on 05/24/2012 5:47:27 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“unless you own property and pay taxes”
______________________________________________

You better reevaluate your post.
EVERYONE pays tax in America.
You want a country only for the elite.
That is nice in thought for a totalitarian country, but not America.
I was 28 before I bought my first property, but I worked like Hell to promote and campaign for Republicans from the age of 16.

If you are serious, elitist such as you are no better then the Communist.


29 posted on 05/24/2012 5:55:29 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

It should be... You can vote if you paid Federal income tax over the time since the last election. To vote you present a picture ID and your returns. If people are smart enough to have these, then they are smart enough to vote.


30 posted on 05/24/2012 5:55:54 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (Still a contributing Republican? Why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Amen! That’s always been my problem with the argument that one must be a land owner. Even after my active duty hubby and I bought a house. The only reason that we did was because of our timing of our move to DC (the housing market was crashing but the BAH rates were not yet reflecting this). Otherwise...we’d either be in an apartment or on-post right now (probably an apartment, as I’m not even sure where soldiers stationed at the Pentagon are eligible for housing...Belvoir? Myer? IDK).

I would have been willing to give up my right to vote as just a military spouse if it were only for landowners and military. I’m not alone in that thought.


31 posted on 05/24/2012 6:02:07 AM PDT by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
In 1964, I had a summer job programing {mechanical) voting machines for the presidential election...

I assume by "programming" you mean making sure all worked correctly and were reset to zero? Hopefully not predetermining the outcome!

32 posted on 05/24/2012 6:03:01 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
If you are serious, elitist such as you are no better then the Communist.

Wow, I didn't know the country was founded by communists! Thanks for the history lesson.

The founders only allowed male property owners to vote. Were they elitist communists? I guess that's somewhat of what they try to teach in liberal "public education" these days.

33 posted on 05/24/2012 6:05:59 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

We have a representative democracy. Remember the woman who thought that she wouldn’t have to make any more car payments after Obama was elected? Do you think that she’s smarter now? What has her experience been over the past four years?


34 posted on 05/24/2012 6:06:38 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

A soldier living in on-post housing can vote “absentee” in his/her home-of-record.


35 posted on 05/24/2012 6:08:11 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

“I assume by “programming” you mean making sure all worked correctly and were reset to zero? Hopefully not predetermining the outcome! “
_______________________________________________

Duhhh, well of course.
There were no computerized machines then, and programing
consisted of inserting hundreds of spacers and other pieces of hardware to make turning a lever record for the indicated candidate.
Naturally,, all machines were then thoroughly tested by the election commission before being sent to the polls.


36 posted on 05/24/2012 6:10:58 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

I personally believe there should be a filter - Photo ID, literacy, understanding of the Constitution, payment of taxes. No “grandfathering.”

Of course, that makes me a horrible racist or whatever.


37 posted on 05/24/2012 6:11:20 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Our forefathers had the right concept at the time....you needed to have an interest (property) in the country.

Agree...100%. We could use their wisdom today not only on this matter but everything.

38 posted on 05/24/2012 6:11:25 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

The Founders were on the right track when they limited the vote to landowners (those who had a dog in the fight because it was their work/effort/money that would be used to support government’s fiscal requirements). I’m a firm believer that, unless you are a productive member of society (employed and actually paying taxes) you should not be able to vote. Those who rely on others to fund their existence shouldn’t ever see the inside of a voting place. Many blame Women’s Suffrage as the blame for today’s ills and they have some standing. The real problem is that, like the “pro-choice-it’s-your-body” “feminisist” of today, they were co-opted and swayed by the same movement that gave them the vote - it had to be enticing to all of a sudden have a meaningful say in how society would go. Most didn’t realize that they already had a very meaningful say just by being women and for their crucial place/influence in the family. I believe the Women’s Suffrage movement opened the door for the deterioration of the family and the Leftists capitalized on it.


39 posted on 05/24/2012 6:13:07 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
"A soldier living in on-post housing can vote “absentee” in his/her home-of-record."

Duh. My point is...what if they don't own the property? A lot of junior soldiers use their parents' address as their home of record.

40 posted on 05/24/2012 6:15:10 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson