Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Purpose of FR and why we can never support Mitt Romney
vanity | Oct 15, 2011 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 10/15/2011 1:51:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Edited on 10/15/2011 1:54:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Our purpose and goal on FR is to restore, defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity!!

The goal of the domestic enemy (the left), i.e., the statist liberals, Marxists and progressives is just the opposite.

The goal of the establishment RINO is to gain control of political power, but not to otherwise rock the boat. The boat continues taking on water and listing sharper to port every time the left takes over, but the unprincipled RINOs do absolutely nothing to right her when they get a chance. In fact, the RINOs actually tack on plenty of their own unconstitutional baggage when they're in power and so our ship of state today is in pretty bad shape.

RINO Romney is one of the worst. We can thank him for being the chief architect of ObamaCare, which if we cannot get overturned and repealed, will finally accomplish the left's major objective of shredding the final remnants of our tattered constitution and ending our God-given Liberty forever (they think).

The liberals believe our constitution is a flawed document written in a different time for different circumstances by rich old racist white men and no longer applies to today's circumstances. They're now even trying to promote the idea that the constitution was never intended to limit or restrict the powers of government.

Like hell! That was and is its primary intent! And we who have sworn an oath to defend it, will defend it--from all enemies, foreign and domestic!

And that's FR's purpose and reason for being.

Romney may be a Republican, and that's questionable, because he's violated nearly every plank in the Republican party's official pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Constitution, pro-Liberty platform, but he's definitely no conservative. In fact his record is that of a statist liberal progressive. And he's a total fraud to boot, with a nasty habit of lying--about everything. He'll do and say anything if he thinks it will help him get elected. He's a two-bit, unprincipled political whore.

Here's Romney's record on some of our primary issues of concern compared to Obama's:

Issue: Obama Romney
Pro-Abortion check check
Gun-grabber check check
Gay rights check check
Gov forced healthcare check check
Tax payer funded abortion check check
Man-made global warming check check
Liberal judges check check
Liberal appointees check check
Ted Kennedy pal check check
Proven liar check check
Fraud check check
Liberal Progressive check check
Enemy of Reagan/Bush check check
Enemy of the tea party check check
Enemy of Liberty check check
Defender of the Constitution no no
Conservative no no
Works across the aisle no yes
Architect of ObamaCare no yes
Domestic Enemy check check
Useful idiot check check

All of the above plus much more is documented in the RomneyTruth files on FR. Click the RomneyTruthFile keyword at the top of the main page. Also watch the "New Romney Campaign Video" also linked at the top of the main page. Watch it all the way through. I even saw some clips I'd never seen before. Pretty damning stuff for anyone running for president as a Republican.

Let's face it folks, the elite establishment RINO corps hates the tea party, hates conservatives, are afraid and even ashamed to have us identify ourselves as Republicans, feel we are dangerous extremist, racist, bigoted bible thumping, gun-toting, flag-waving neanderthals. The tea party is the best thing to happen for America since 1776 and our tea party candidates are the best thing for the GOP since Ronald Reagan, but what do the elite establishment RINOs do? They declare us the enemy! They went after Sarah Palin and some of our other tea party candidates with bared fangs and talons. Karl Rove and company were and continue to be as nasty and shameless on the attack as the nastiest lying liberal. Sarah Palin was the most exciting new face in GOP politics in a century and would have been a landslide 57 state victory over the corrupt, lying Marxist/progressive Obama. But the good ol' boys, i.e., the elite establishment corrupt crony capitalist GOP bastards could have none of that. Instead, they've opted to go all in with a corrupt, lying statist/progressive of their own: Willard (the Rat) Romney.

Well, good luck getting the Rat elected without the committed grassroots, pro-life, pro-constitution conservatives or the majority of the tea party.

FR, for one, will not play that game. NO MORE RINOS!!

No Romney. NOT ON FR!! NOT ON MY WATCH!!

Should Romney be "the one," I'll vote for the down-ticket conservatives on the ballot, but I will not vote for an abortionist, gay-rights pushing, gun-grabbing, global-warming advocating, big government healthcare mandating statist/progressive for president!! I'd rather write-in the name of the tea party conservative who best matches my beliefs. Romney is no 80 percenter. Not even close! He's the backstabbing enemy within.

God bless America!!

Long live the Republic!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; 2sides4romney; 3sides4romney; 4sides4romney; acorn4romney; allsides4romney; amen; backstabberromney; badgovromney; badsportromney; benedictromney; bigdigromney; biggovernment; bishopromney; bluebloodrepublicans; brutusromney; bugzapper; byebyerinos; carpetbaggerromney; commiecare; democratromney; dnc4romney; donatetofr; doyoustandforfr; elections; establishment; establishment4mitt; establishment4romney; flipflopromney; fr; freerepublic; freerepublichistory; guncontrol; gungrabbers4romney; homosexualagenda; inman; jimrob; jimthompson; justsayno2romney; loserromney; megarinoromney; mexicans4romney; mitt; mitt4romney; mittbotsgetthezot; mittromney; mitttiedspot2car; mittwilltossyundrbus; moralabsolutes; msm4romney; nobama2012; nomorerinos; noromney2012; nrcc4romney; nrsc4romney; obama4romney; obamabeatmccainonce; obamacare; obamacare4romney; obamneycare; obaromney; panderingromney; poorsportromney; rinoromney; rnc4romney; romney; romney2lose; romney4establishment; romney4globalwarming; romney4himself; romney4leftists; romney4liberals; romney4marxism; romney4mccain; romney4obama; romney4obamacare; romney4progressives; romney4romney; romney4soros; romneyabortion; romneyalbatross; romneyaliar; romneyantifederalism; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneyantiteaparty; romneycare; romneydirtytrick; romneyexcuses; romneyfees; romneyfraud; romneyguncontrol; romneyisobamalite; romneyliar; romneylies; romneylovesobama; romneyprogressive; romneytaxes; romneythebackstabber; romneytheposer; romneytherino; romneytruthfile; ruinerromney; saynotomitt; shapeshifterromney; slickwillard; smallromney; soros4romney; stenchofromney; surfrinagwiass; teapartyantiromney; themagicrino; tokyoromney; twofaceromney; untrustworthyromney; verminromney; vichyrinoromney; vichyromney; votecain; weakfrontrunner; willardcare; zots4romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 981-988 next last
To: C210N

Insanity No way I will vote for Romney.I’ll write in Palin.


161 posted on 10/15/2011 2:37:51 PM PDT by littlesorrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I understand Anybody But Obama. We lived it 3 years ago. That is why we need to coalesce behind a conservative NOW!!!


162 posted on 10/15/2011 2:38:42 PM PDT by Yaelle (Get aboard the Cain train with a $9.99 donation this weekend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Romney is best described as a Democrat in Republican clothes: a DIRC. I find him detestable. If he’s the nominee, I leave the Rep Party. It means the fight for the soul of the party by conservatives is lost.


163 posted on 10/15/2011 2:38:52 PM PDT by wiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
If Romney gets the nomination, Sarah Palin will (not if) take it to her grave with her. She was the best chance to stop Romney and the best contrast to Obama. Thats not a legacy I would want to live with.

Calm yourself. You're so heartbroken over the woman that now you're turning on her.

If Romney gets the nomination, he loses. The media and the left will glue him to Wall Street on Day One. Conservatives will not hold their noses. He loses.

In 2016, Sarah runs and wins at the ripe old age of 52.

164 posted on 10/15/2011 2:39:02 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Obama created MORE poor people...

Yes he did...

Yad thunk shed be happy about that !!!

:)


165 posted on 10/15/2011 2:39:10 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Right on. I despise Romney and all RINOs as much as the open leftist Dems.

If Romney or any RINO is the GOP’s nomineee, I will either leave the presidential blank or write in somebody. Vote for conservative Congress and senate.

No way will I ever vote for Romney for anything, much less president.


166 posted on 10/15/2011 2:39:26 PM PDT by madmaximus (Liberaltarians=junkies,perverts,anti-semites,anti-military,cultural marxists without all the taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
How can people even consider someone who has done the exact same thing that Barrycare does, destroy the medical system in order to grab more power for government? That's why I don't understand some of the “hot topics” about Romney, why would you ever get to the point of considering him and have to analyze anything about the guy other than just the fact of Romneycare?
167 posted on 10/15/2011 2:39:54 PM PDT by Rashputin (Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

There wouldn’t be a 2016. There might not be one, with America, no matter who wins.


168 posted on 10/15/2011 2:40:26 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("If Herman Cain does become President, his Vice President will be known as Co-Cain." -- Laz, 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop
Romney is a liberal.

What is it that you expect him to do if elected?

169 posted on 10/15/2011 2:40:26 PM PDT by Dr. White
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: shield; Jim Robinson

“This is important statement. There are a lot of Romney supporters here disguised as Cain supporters. I wish you luck in finding them and zotting them.”

Who? Who the is a Romney supporter who’s posing as a Cain supporter?

Name them.

Just because somebody doesn’t believe that Perry is a good conservative (or believe that Perry would stand a chance in a nationally televised debate against Obama) DOES NOT make them a ROMNEY supporter!

LOW BLOW!

I fought Perry when Perry was the ‘cool kid’ here in FR. I’ll fight Perry until the end.

Why?

Because I friggin’ LIVE in Texas and I think he’s a crappy conservative! (Texas can do better!)


170 posted on 10/15/2011 2:40:50 PM PDT by Marie (Cain 9s Have Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

What, exactly, would you expect to get from a President Romney?
More conservative Supreme Court nominees than I will from a President Obama.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want Romney either. But the above is a fact.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A fact? Are you outta you mind? We’ve had a Republican majority in the White House with more appointees to the Supreme Court than dems. But what good has that done us?

I have written off the SCOTUS years ago. No way will Mitt - even if he had 5 choices to appoint - could even make a difference to that liberal cess pool..


171 posted on 10/15/2011 2:41:21 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
YITBOS!!
172 posted on 10/15/2011 2:41:37 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

What happens when the eventual nominee picks Romney for VP?


173 posted on 10/15/2011 2:42:03 PM PDT by Marak (I don't deal with reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
If Romney gets the nomination, Sarah Palin will (not if) take it to her grave with her. She was the best chance to stop Romney and the best contrast to Obama. Thats not a legacy I would want to live with.

Now don't get your hopes up too high FRiend, but if Romney IS the GOP nominee, it would not surprise me to see Sarah Palin enter the race as an Independent and/or a candidate of the Tea Party. Now many will say she would guarantee the re-election of 0bama if she did that, but if there is no difference between the Kenyan Klown in the White House right now, and Mitt-Witt Obomney, what does it matter?

If Romney is the nominee, and Sarah Palin runs as an third party candidate, by God I will throw the lever for her, and do it enthusiastically!
174 posted on 10/15/2011 2:42:30 PM PDT by mkjessup (Herman Cain is a God fearin', Jesus-lovin', Constitution-revering PATRIOT. What's not to like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: shield
There are a lot of Romney supporters here disguised as Cain supporters.

Actually it is the Perry supporters who are the Romney supporters in disguise.

How about you answer the questions this time instead of dreaming up the next attack rant to post about Cain?

Who got in the race last after it was clear Romney was not going to get any appreciable support from social conservatives?

Who did the GOP Establishment push into the race after it seem Tea Party heroine Bachmann was going to upset Romney’s ride to the nomination?

Who does the GOP Establishment see as their back up card if Romney fails?

Who has long standing intimate ties with the Liberal wing of the GOP Establishment?

The answer is Rick Perry.

Bill Kristol to a NY Time Reporter telling him how the GOP Establishment plans to deal with “the Tea party mutiny”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2792217/posts?page=3

Kristol told me just after Perry entered the race, a development that essentially ended [the more radical Michele] Bachmann’s brief ascent. Establishment Republicans may prefer Romney to Perry, but their assumption is that either man can be counted on to steer the party back toward the broad center next fall, effectively disarming the Tea Party mutiny.

Wonder who Perry will be VP with?

Odd how that question never gets asked of Perry.

Could it be because everyone knows Perry is the GOP Establishment mole in the race to split the Tea Party/Conservative vote and hand the nomination to Romney?

Could it be because they know the ticket the GOP Machine is setting up is “Romney/Perry 2012? Think about it. Romney has the money, Perry has the idolatrous worship from the social Conservatives.

Could that be why the Perry camp is knowingly lying about Cain’s solidly Conservative record on both social and fiscal issues? Because they know full well Perry’s record can not stand close scrutiny?

What does anyone really know about Perry other then the nice words and platitudes he puts in his speeches? Looks like Perry is just Bush 3.0 another tough talking social conservative who will go to DC and be yet another good little GOP crony capitalist water boy.

175 posted on 10/15/2011 2:42:55 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The correct term is “liberal ill-logic”. :o)


176 posted on 10/15/2011 2:42:59 PM PDT by Dr. White
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Ladies and gentlemen we have a ... BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!

I rousing second here.

You GOP elite wanna elect him? Do it without us.


177 posted on 10/15/2011 2:43:33 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
There won't be a 2016 that we recognize with Romney either. The GOP will have gone the way of the Whigs by halfway through his term.

I guess bottom line...I'll never vote for Romney, ever. I almost didn't vote for McCain. Palin was the only reason.

178 posted on 10/15/2011 2:43:33 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I am going to vote a straight Republican ticket, regardless of who the candidate(s) are.

Reducing or slowing regulation is the key to restoring the economy and the Executive Branch controls the “Plum Book” of critical Executive jobs in government. The Republican party will pull the right people into those positions, regardless of who the Republican POTUS is.

The goal is to control the House, Senate and veto pen. All else is secondary.


179 posted on 10/15/2011 2:44:05 PM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Amen!


180 posted on 10/15/2011 2:44:44 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democrat Party, the party of the KKK (tm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 981-988 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson