Posted on 07/10/2011 10:31:40 AM PDT by kristinn
I was referring to the fact that the GOP gained the House in 2010, overcoming the fraud, the Dem corruption, and whatnot that are the Dems' voting weapons of choice. Perhaps I misread your post, or, once again, you misunderstood my post.
Let me put it another way.........................
Obama won the '08 election through many different ways; most of them fraudulent.
This time around, even with fraud, the MSM shilling for him, and the race card, the enthusiasm, both real and phony, the enthusiasm is all for Sarah/ to get rid of Obama. The only problem being WHO the GOP's nominee is. Hopefully it WILL be Sarah Palin and in that case, though unseating Obama won't be "a walk in the park", it IS very doable!
I like the Newsweek cover photo. It makes her appear more mature, rather than a pin-up. There is no fire in any of the other Republican Candidates and that’s why I see her as getting into the race. You go Lady!! Explode their heads!
Are you saying she is shielded from that possibility by being a "private citizen"? If so, kindly direct the uninitiated to this wonderful statute or rule.
I totally agree with you. It is an ugly picture of Sarah. She does look masculine. I wouldn’t trust Newsweek with a picture of my cat.
Facts? Like hell. You and the rest of the Anti-Palin Slime Squad wouldn’t know facts if they crawled up your patootie and died there.
Here’s a link to FReeper Springfield Reformer demolishing the lame argument from the deranged and hopefully soon to be former-FReeper wtc911.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2744227/replies?c=71
Sarah, we are great admirers of you and your philosophy. Unfortunately, you ran for VP before your were ready. You went on TV and debated an idiot who could make up lies and re write history faster than you could counter. As a result you became a lightening rod. Back Bachmann and negotiate a position in her admin and we all win ! Then you will be ready to run and WIN....
___________________________________________
Bachman? She’s racking up a lot of negatives just lately including that idiot Rollins that she has refused to dump and that stupid pledge she just signed....she needs to get some executive experience herself IMHO.
Unfair isn't it? Women always have one more dimension to present to others than men do, and the good ones do it with a flair. As does Palin.
Try this...Perfect rovian storm secretly wishes he could find a job that lets him go to work dressed like a girl scout...Now, prove me wrong or it must be true.
The law is the law.
I am such a guy.
But I put liberty above all other earthly pursuits.
The MSM and the Dem opposition research teams have been after ALL of the Palins for years and have nothing to show for it.
OTOH, who knows what is lurking in the collective closets of all the the announced and still to be GOP candidates, that will be flung at them? Neither do we know how any of them are going to react to such a heaping on, should 1) Palin not enter the race 2)not win the primaries.
Truth be told, I have never lived throw such apolitical abomination of mud slinging as has been the Palin saga ( and I do know what the Dems tried to do, sub rosa, to Mamie Eisenhower, what they did to Nixon, Reagan, and both Bushes ), in my life and she and her family are still standing. I really doubt that the others could take such an onslaught.
And you're right.........she's been running for a long time;just in her own way!
That Time edition will be in most if not all doctors' and dentists' offices. What better way to get her thoughts out. You ever pick up a copy and notice most of the docs and dentists always have those publications sent to their office and not their home?
It is telling that you answered me and didn’t answer Springfield Reformer.
You didn’t answer him because he’s right and it completely demolishes your interpretation of the law and you don’t have an answer for that.
That’s all well and good, as long as your fellow mouth breathers don’t go around reposting your tripe and labeling it as ‘factual’.
There is no worry about her organization in the early states. Those who are lying, stop. Those who are worried, be assured.
I wouldn’t exactly put it past them. It really doesn’t look a whole lot like her; her facial shape is not that masculine. Thankfully, she has enough outlets that will allow a real good photo of her to be published.
She was on Fox Sunday Morning a couple of weeks ago. She had the clearest, most forthright and honest eyes I’ve ever seen (oh, I know she wears eye makeup but most of us do).. and she absolutely tore it up on there with her answers and knowledge of whatever was asked.
I think she can win, too! I hope she does run, but if she doesn’t, I’ll just have to choose among the other Repub. primary candidates.
I’ll bet it pained Newsweek to have to run a story on EEEEvil Sarah Palin!
All I can say...and say...is....
RUN, SARAH...R U N!!!
Reagan was running hard, since 1976. But he did not announce officially until the week before Thanksgiving of 1979. It is still many months until November. And all the other candidates and the media said: He is too old. He is not going to run. He is just a spokesperson.
This is deja vu.
A really bad pic that makes her head look huge. It’s only saving grace is that you can see that she is still thin,
Palin Quote in Meet the Press from her interview with Newsweek:
“The people of America are desperate for postitive change, and deserving of positive change... I’m not so egotistical as to believe that it has to be me, or it can only be me, to turn things around. But I do believe that I can win.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.