Posted on 06/08/2011 10:19:59 AM PDT by Red Badger
The males of two bipedal hominid species that roamed the South African savannah more than a million years ago were stay-at-home kind of guys when compared to the gadabout gals, says a new high-tech study led by the University of Colorado Boulder.
The team, which studied teeth from a group of extinct Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus individuals from two adjacent cave systems in South Africa, found more than half of the female teeth were from outside the local area, said CU-Boulder adjunct professor and lead study author Sandi Copeland. In contrast, only about 10 percent of the male hominid teeth were from elsewhere, suggesting they likely grew up and died in the same area.
"One of our goals was to try to find something out about early hominid landscape use," said Copeland, who also is affiliated with the Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. "Here we have the first direct glimpse of the geographic movements of early hominids, and it appears the females preferentially moved away from their residential groups."
A paper on the subject is being published in the June 2 issue of Nature.
[snip]
The new study results were somewhat surprising, said Copeland. "We assumed more of the hominids would be from non-local areas since it is generally thought the evolution of bipedalism was due in part to allow individuals to range longer distances," she said. "Such small home ranges could imply that bipedalism evolved for other reasons."
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
... And they died out, right?
They threw stones..............
Woman! Fetch me some bacon!
They are so clueless. Walking on two legs is not a net advantage. Having two arms free to wield weapons is. Hunting does not cause our armpits to start lubricating for an extended fight, but the approach of a strange human does. Most human specific traits were and still are for tribal warfare.
the key word in there being “extinct”...
Amazing what conclusions you can come to, as this article does, when you make some basic erroneous assumptions.
Usually, you can “prove” your assumptions by assuming your assumptions and examining the evidence through the lens of those assumptions... and NOT GET DIZZY DOING SO!
Strong the BS is with this article.
BS
They had a little child throw the first one ("let him who is without sin cast the first stone...").
Probably visiting their mothers.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.