1 posted on
05/29/2011 2:44:26 PM PDT by
Hojczyk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Hojczyk
I somehow missed where all the leftists were clamoring for Palin to run.
To: Hojczyk
3 posted on
05/29/2011 2:49:51 PM PDT by
seowulf
("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
To: Hojczyk
If the state-controlled media/Democrat cartel actually believed that Sarah Palin was unelectable, they'd be begging the GOP to nominate her.
4 posted on
05/29/2011 2:50:50 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
To: Hojczyk
5 posted on
05/29/2011 2:51:49 PM PDT by
Cringing Negativism Network
(BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
To: Hojczyk
Be careful what you wish for, Dems. I remember y’all being giddy about the prospect of Reagan running against Carter in 1980.
How’d that work out for you? LOL
7 posted on
05/29/2011 2:54:46 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Hojczyk
Washington Post nonsense. The left is in total denial about Obama’s slim chances for re-election and are trying to kid themselves (and anyone on the right foolish enough to pay attention to them) that the charismatic, conservative Sarah Palin wouldn’t be a formidable opponent for the failed Barack Hussein Obama. They are monstrously mistaken.
8 posted on
05/29/2011 2:57:22 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
To: Hojczyk
They fail to understand the number one priority is to ditch the schmuck Obama. He will be gone. The only question is whether we put a true Conservative in or a RINO.
9 posted on
05/29/2011 2:57:49 PM PDT by
moehoward
To: Hojczyk
Exactly the opposite of what they predict will be the result of Sarah running for President.
They dismiss and cut her off at the knees, in an attempt to minimize her effect, is not going to work. It is all BS, intended to influence voters from the get go.
Pay no attention to their predictions. It is all bull corn!
11 posted on
05/29/2011 3:02:32 PM PDT by
Countyline
(God loves you ... He wants you to love Him back; to learn of Him and obey His commands.)
To: Hojczyk
Say what you will, but there is a similarity amongst the attitudes of both Party Establishments of 1980 and the present.
For those old enough, remember how Democrats were gleefully giggling about a Reagan nomination? Remember too how Republican Beltway types were saying a Reagan nomination would be the same as Goldwater in ‘64?
The only difference I can see this time is Democrats are saying one thing publicly, but the attitude inside the White House seems to be very fearful of Gov. Palin.
History reflects how these Elites are almost always wrong in their predictions. I have no reason to feel that 2012 would be any different.
To: Hojczyk
Can’t wait for the debates. Hey bozo, what is the Obama Doctrine?
Pray for America
13 posted on
05/29/2011 3:07:17 PM PDT by
bray
(Hey Country Club, hold Sarah's coat while she kicks his ____.)
To: Hojczyk
The boxing in has started.. Palin’s a far right bandleader, and all other Republicans running should abandon the conservatives and present a campaign of ‘moderate’ opinions to try to capture the middle, since the ‘far right’ is tied up.
Unfortunately, I've seen nothing from Palin that's not ‘moderate’, and certainly nothing that’d qualify in my mind as being ‘far right.’ The confusing stance on don't ask, don't tell, the lack of an austerity budget, nothing about curtailing the federal worker mob, nor the public money lottery winners who are our elected officials. I'd savor some juicy far right opinions from Palin, or any Republican in the race. Honestly, all I've seen so far has been watered down leftist opinions.
If every McCain isn't screaming in outrage at you, you're probably either a leftist or someone who's giving poll pre-screened opinions, and I couldn't care less if you won or lost, as the end path is the same - higher taxes curtailing economic development, a continued protection of the illegals who are stealing the jobs of our young, and a rubber stamp upon the ‘entitlement’ programs that is devaluing our money.
14 posted on
05/29/2011 3:07:50 PM PDT by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: Hojczyk
Last October, top White House adviser David Plouffe told reporters of the 2012 GOP contest: "These guys are going to be running through hoops to please the far-right folks who are kind of the acolytes of Sarah Palin. Now maybe she'll be running herself. Something tells me we won?t get that lucky."
_____________________
Hmmmmm....last October...2010....before the huge Dem upset wasn't it?
That's last year's tune wash compost dudes. I want to know what they're singing today, I mean right now.
15 posted on
05/29/2011 3:08:24 PM PDT by
Covenantor
("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
To: Hojczyk
S-C-A-R-E-D of Palin is what the Dems are. Looks good on them...
To: Hojczyk
Jimmy Carter, (along with Chris Matthews and Charles Krauthammers who were on his WH staff) got their wish that Ronald Reagan would run too.
21 posted on
05/29/2011 3:25:34 PM PDT by
Sea Parrot
(Being an autodidact, I happily escaped the bureaucratization of intellect)
To: Hojczyk
top White House adviser David Plouffe told reporters of the 2012 GOP contest: These guys are going to be running through hoops to please the far-right folks who are kind of the acolytes of Sarah Palin. Now maybe shell be running herself. Something tells me we wont get that lucky. Be careful what you wish for cretin. You might just get it. Palin is not "Zero". "Zero" lies, like Plouffe.
22 posted on
05/29/2011 3:32:57 PM PDT by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: Hojczyk
"But top Democrats believe her candidacy would help them even if she did not win, forcing the other Republicans to take more conservative positions than they would otherwise to compete with Palin among GOP activists." Now that would be nice!
25 posted on
05/29/2011 3:48:35 PM PDT by
StormEye
To: Hojczyk
Democrats, trying to convince themselves and others that, Palin would be the ideal candidate for them to run against. It’s the reverse psychology strategy, which essentially means that, they’re running scared of a Palin candidacy, and would like to head her off at the pass.
It ain’t gonna work, democrats!
26 posted on
05/29/2011 3:55:58 PM PDT by
adorno
To: Hojczyk
Democrats and FReepers united. Isn't it a great thing!
ML/NJ
28 posted on
05/29/2011 4:34:06 PM PDT by
ml/nj
To: Hojczyk
It must be true!
It's in the Washington (Com)Post!!!
30 posted on
05/29/2011 4:44:22 PM PDT by
airborne
(Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
To: Hojczyk
But top Democrats believe her candidacy would help them even if she did not win, forcing the other Republicans to take more conservative positions than they would otherwise to compete with Palin among GOP activists. Idiot Dems learned nothing from 2010
Good, let it continue.
31 posted on
05/29/2011 5:00:30 PM PDT by
hattend
(Let's all meet Sarah at her last bus stop -- 1600 Pennsylvania Ave in Jan 2013)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson