Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN via BREAKING on Drudge: White House releases Obama birth certificate
CNN ^ | 27 APR 11 | DCBryan1

Posted on 04/27/2011 6:09:26 AM PDT by DCBryan1

Edited on 04/27/2011 6:22:09 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

(CNN) The White House released President Obama’s original birth certificate Wednesday.

The surprise release follows recent and sustained remarks by businessman Donald Trump, among others, that raised doubts as to whether the president was born in the United States.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 0; 2004electionredux; 44; barry; barrysoerto; bc; birth; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; borninabunker; certificate; certifigate; clicktoaddkeyword; colb; colbfake; communist; danrather; dualcitizenship; dunham; eligibility; fake; fakebutaccurate; finland; foreigner; forgery; fraud; hawaii; hussein; indonesia; kenya; littlebarry; mediaprotectinghim; mohommad; naturalborncitizen; noteligible; notnaturalborn; obama; officialbcrelease; photoshop; photoshopped; rathergate; seebs; soerto; soetoro; stanley; trump; underfinland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 1,521-1,523 next last
To: DCBryan1

“It’s a Nice Day for a White Wedding!”
Event Date Time Measure
Mother Born 11/29/1942
Barack Conceived 11/7/1960 17.95 Years
Dunham / Obama Shotgun Wedding 2/2/1961 2.9 Months
Barack Born 8/4/1961 6.1 Months


441 posted on 04/27/2011 7:46:47 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (0bamanomics: Trickle Up Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife

You’re right!

It’s the COLB not the long form birth certificate as claimed. So it’s a fraud rather than a fake.

My mistake....


442 posted on 04/27/2011 7:47:38 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment
not to mention the idea that she was probably pregnant at 17. That is my guess as to what he was hiding all these years- something that embarrassed his mother, and he had lied about to supposedly protect her.

Simply not true. The fact that she was pregnant before marriage was always well known as was her birthdate. Heck, Obama even boasted about it at times. Go to Wikipedia (yes even in the entires before this morning). Her marriage date was ALWAYS listed as well under nine months before Obama's birth.

443 posted on 04/27/2011 7:48:09 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I understood it the first time.


444 posted on 04/27/2011 7:48:14 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

It’s hard to take the word of a congenital liar.


445 posted on 04/27/2011 7:48:26 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Well stated, butterdezillion. Love your “French,” it was called for.

So how can we find out what the transaction logs are at this point? Do his numbers on this thing match?


446 posted on 04/27/2011 7:48:35 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

They’ll take door number 3.


447 posted on 04/27/2011 7:48:48 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie; DCBryan1

UM:
Event Date Time Measure
Mother Born 11/29/1942
Barack Conceived 11/7/1960 17.95 Years
Dunham / Obama Shotgun Wedding 2/2/1961 2.9 Months
Barack Born 8/4/1961 6.1 Months

So if these are true, then the birth certificate is a fraud since his mother would have a last name of Obama and not Dunham (if married 6 months earlier to Obama).


448 posted on 04/27/2011 7:49:31 AM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Interesting. Hawaii seems to have a strong attraction for people from Kansas.


449 posted on 04/27/2011 7:49:36 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty
Okay. Opened in Adobe Acrobat.....now what?
(_Jim shakes head ... blinks a few times ...)

Can I ask you how much detective work you've done?

Fundamentals first: Document author, creation date, fonts used, Version used to create, etc.

450 posted on 04/27/2011 7:49:57 AM PDT by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the favored tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: magritte

No, it’s not. The “date filed” is 3 days before the Nordyke BC’s “date filed” but the BC# is higher/later than theirs.

This BC# is most probably the BC# for a little girl who was born on Aug 4, died on Aug 5, is in the HDOH birth and death index for 1960-64 BUT FOR WHOM THE HDOH CLAIMS THEY HAVE NO RECORDS.

IOW, her name was on the record when they printed out the birth index, but it’s not on that record any more. Three guesses as to whose name is now on that record with that BC#.

I’ve been saying all along that the only way we will know whether ANYTHING from the HDOH or any government office is genuine is by looking at the embedded transaction logs to see if this BC# was just recently changed from this little girl’s name to Obama’s name.

Him producing this document now fits everything I’ve been saying. Fukino gave the interview to Isikoff because they had the forgery done and in their office. Still doesn’t match her statement that it was half typed, half printed - so it doesn’t fit Abercrombie’s statement that it was “actually written down in the archives”.

None of the stories match up. This image is half from the photocopier (note the side edges) and half on security paper. It’s half certified (has Onaka’s stamp on it) and half not certified (no seal). It’s half Ann Obama and half Stanley Dunham. No father’s signature.


451 posted on 04/27/2011 7:50:30 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Look at the number in the top right. 0bama’s “Department of Health” “File Number” is:

151____61____10641

Susan Nordyke, born later with all her dates later, has a File number of:

151____61____10637

How can Susan Nordyke receive a lower number than Barack?

She was born later by every date on each document.

Governments are nothing if not bureaucratically regimented.

Forms in those days came sequentially pre-printed.

There’s something fishy about the File Number. DIG PEOPLE!


452 posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:03 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (0bamanomics: Trickle Up Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

IMO it’s all part of the political show and the media’s role in fueling whatever “they” want to make issue of. By diverting or creating a stage for ratings...if there isn’t a story they will create one.

Trump had the stage,....Media-crat’s re-set the stage so their hero could be back in the limelight...if anyone forced the issue it was the media for giving it the time and space. They like Trump because it makes good headlines and engages the public. I even like to see Trump take down Obama....but it’s still all a political show between players and the media.

Even if this had been used for Impeachment...it would be like Clintons ordeal....everybody watched the tawdry affair ...but Clinton served his term and retained his leadership role even to this date, despite being impeached. .... after the fact now says it well.

So all this isn’t going to make one iotta of difference.

Interesting though is Trump used the same lines the media had been using...”Lets now get onto other more important issues”. So we’re all of course being played.


453 posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:09 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Yesterday there was a thread about it. Apparently it was on the books from 2001 but has not been enforced until recently.
454 posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:09 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Did you notice the DOH number at the top is higher than the Nordyke BC number? How can that be when Obama was born before Nordyke?


455 posted on 04/27/2011 7:51:46 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; hoosiermama; STARWISE; maggief; Liz; onyx; SE Mom
I’ve been on a self imposed sabatical spending time with family, but this news today is too much to resist commenting on...lol. Thank God Trump took it to Obama!
Good to see everybody again. I have alot of catching up to do!


Me, too, Pen...the minute I saw the banner on Fox, I had to find you gals. Just like old times! :)
456 posted on 04/27/2011 7:52:19 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

“Kenya was a Dutch colony. “

I thought it was a British colony.


457 posted on 04/27/2011 7:52:25 AM PDT by Mimi3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget; Tatze
The file I downloaded says it is a .jpg (JPEG image) file, not a .pdf. All other, authentic images (Nordyke twin, long-form released on request in Mar. 2011, etc.) have Exif or JFIF headers.
458 posted on 04/27/2011 7:52:38 AM PDT by NJ_Tom (Who ever thought that Kenya would be the next nuclear power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
“not added in as vector fonts, because there’s a whitish shroud around each letter.”

I just opened the PDF file and holy cr@p I think you are right.

That white ghosting is around all the letters.

Look at a letter “O” or “C” and you can’t see the security paper.

This looks like chunks of text pasted on the security paper. The text chunks cover the security paper.

Back in post 336 I said

That looks like unsharp masking was applied to the image. If you look at the parts of the image which are less sharp to begin with, especially the document number 61 10641, you'll see less of an artifact. Many digital cameras and scanners do this type of sharpening automatically unless you turn it off.

I stick by it. Another indication of unsharp masking is the last 1 in the "Apr 25 2011" stamp. The right edge of the one appears to have fallen right on the pixel so it is half dark and there is no boost from the dark left part of the one, to the half dark right pixel to the background. That's one of the problem of digital unsharp masking algorithms that it can't handle a pixel split evenly between a dark section and a light one.

The centers of the letters O, C and U get hit with an unsharp mask from both sides which tends to wipe out the background.

459 posted on 04/27/2011 7:53:10 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: mom.mom

“Obama was born before the Nordyke twins but has a higher number than them:

Nordyke - 10637, 10638
Obama - 10641”


Not only was Obama born first, the date of registry on the certificate was a couple of days prior to the one for the twins. No idea whether that means anything.


460 posted on 04/27/2011 7:53:10 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 1,521-1,523 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson