Skip to comments.
Pete King bill would ban guns within 1,000 feet of lawmakers
Politico ^
| 1/11/11
| SHIRA TOEPLITZ
Posted on 01/11/2011 10:16:18 AM PST by Redcloak
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), one of the few pro-gun control Republicans in the House, wants to make it illegal for someone to carry a gun within 1,000 feet of certain high-ranking federal officials, including members of Congress.
It is imperative that we do all that we can to give law enforcement the tools they need to ensure the safety of New Yorkers and prevent an attack before it happens, said King, who is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, during a press conference in New York.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: banglist; congress; control; democrats; giffords; gun; gungrabbingrino; king; ny; reichstagfire; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Someone want to explain to me again why the NRA should never support pro-gun Democrats and always support Republicans?
1
posted on
01/11/2011 10:16:22 AM PST
by
Redcloak
To: Redcloak
Wow, this guy is an asshat.
2
posted on
01/11/2011 10:17:55 AM PST
by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: Redcloak
Pro Second Amendment only when convenient.
To: Redcloak
Let us also make it illegal to hunt deer in the King’s forest. These peasants must know their place, and bow down before their betters.
To: Redcloak
The real question is, what makes them so special?
5
posted on
01/11/2011 10:18:25 AM PST
by
brytlea
To: Redcloak
I think maybe we should ban politicians from being within 1000 feet of guns. Or talking about them. Or legislating about them. Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
6
posted on
01/11/2011 10:18:40 AM PST
by
newheart
(The trouble ain't too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right. -Mark Twain)
To: Redcloak
Well, that oughtta make everyone safe....
To: newheart
I think we should ban politicians.
8
posted on
01/11/2011 10:19:31 AM PST
by
Jolla
To: Redcloak
How do you keep the politicians from moving too close?
9
posted on
01/11/2011 10:19:37 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: newheart
To: Redcloak
I’m hoping this is a satire piece, but fearing it’s not.
11
posted on
01/11/2011 10:20:08 AM PST
by
cc2k
(If having an "R" makes you consevative, does walking into a barn make you a horse?)
To: Redcloak
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..."
...except that elected federal officials are more equal than the peasants.
12
posted on
01/11/2011 10:20:36 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
('If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: Redcloak
I don’t know that there’s anyone around here who would accept the premise of that question, except for the fact that “pro-gun Democrats” are often nothing more than poseurs who answer to and cooperate with their own party’s leadership.
13
posted on
01/11/2011 10:20:36 AM PST
by
OKSooner
(Obama confessed "his muslim faith" on the George Stephanopolous show on September 7th, 2008.)
To: Redcloak
I heard that one of the people who tackled Loughner while he was reloading was himself carrying a concealed weapon and would not have approached trouble if he wasn't armed. Thus more would have died if this proposed law was in effect.
14
posted on
01/11/2011 10:20:39 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
To: Redcloak
Still wouldn’t be very safe in DC. There’s a lawbreaker, I mean, lawmaker within a thousand feet of everything and everyone.
15
posted on
01/11/2011 10:21:03 AM PST
by
WOBBLY BOB
( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
To: Redcloak
I am far from being a gun control guy, but if someone is not allowed to serve in the military due to psychological issues, shouldn’t that information be filed and then appear when someone attempts to legally purchase a firearm? That ceratinly would not be protected due to your medical records being private.
16
posted on
01/11/2011 10:21:16 AM PST
by
cumbo78
To: Redcloak
They are ALL statists at heart.
Does this apply to cops and secret service too??
We know it doesn’t apply to lawbreakers.
17
posted on
01/11/2011 10:21:16 AM PST
by
GeronL
(How DARE you have an opinion!!)
To: Redcloak
I am far from being a gun control guy, but if someone is not allowed to serve in the military due to psychological issues, shouldn’t that information be filed and then appear when someone attempts to legally purchase a firearm? That ceratinly would not be protected due to your medical records being private.
18
posted on
01/11/2011 10:21:26 AM PST
by
cumbo78
To: newheart
I think maybe we should ban politicians from being within 1000 feet of guns. ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!!
19
posted on
01/11/2011 10:21:27 AM PST
by
frithguild
(The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
To: Redcloak
What, you think everyone follows their own party platform tooth and nail?
20
posted on
01/11/2011 10:21:57 AM PST
by
theDentist
(fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson