Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Podesta: Obama Can Use ‘Armed Forces’ to Push Progressive Agenda (WTF?!?)
The Blaze ^ | 11/18/10 | Jonathon Seidl

Posted on 11/18/2010 10:10:08 AM PST by My Favorite Headache

The liberal Center for American Progress doesn’t believe significant GOP gains in the House and Senate should stop the President from implementing more of his polices. The group released a report Tuesday suggesting ways Obama can bypass Congress to accomplish a progressive agenda, and it cites the president’s power as commander-in-chief to make its point.

“I think most of the conversation since the election has been about how President Obama adjusts to the new situation on Capitol Hill,” Center for American Progress head and former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta told the Daily Caller. “While that’s an important conversation, it simply ignores the president’s ability to use all levels of his power and authority to move the country forward.”

How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”

What exactly does Podesta think the president should use such powers to “accomplish”? Among others, the report suggests “job creation,“ ”quality affordable health care,“ ”sustainable security,“ and ”a clean energy future.”

The report cites specific goals such as mitigating the effects of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, supporting a Palestinian state, and reducing greenhouse gasses by 17 percent by 2020.

“The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy,” Podesta writes. ”Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still.”

Statement from John D. Podesta November 15, 2010

In the aftermath of this month’s midterm congressional elections, pundits and politicians across the ideological spectrum are focusing on how difficult it will be for President Barack Obama to advance his policy priorities through Congress. Predictions of stalemate abound. And some debate whether the administration should tack to the left or to the center and compromise with or confront the new House leadership.

As a former White House chief of staff, I believe those to be the wrong preoccupations. President Obama’s ability to govern the country as chief executive presents an opportunity to demonstrate strength, resolve, and a capacity to get things done on a host of pressing challenges of importance to the public and our economy. Progress, not positioning, is what the public wants and deserves.

The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president significant authority to make and implement policy. These authorities can be used to ensure positive progress on many of the key issues facing the country through:

* Executive orders * Rulemaking * Agency management * Convening and creating public-private partnerships * Commanding the armed forces * Diplomacy

The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated. President Bush, for example, faced a divided Congress throughout most of his term in office, yet few can doubt his ability to craft a unique and deeply conservative agenda using every aspect of the policymaking apparatus at his disposal. And, after his party lost control of Congress in 1994, President Clinton used executive authority and convening power to make significant progressive change. For instance, he protected more great spaces in the lower 48 states than any president since Theodore Roosevelt, established for the first time significant protections for Americans’ medical privacy, and urged the creation of the Welfare-to-Work Partnership that enlisted the help of 20,000 businesses in moving more than 1 million welfare recipients into the workforce.

The upshot: Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still. This administration has a similar opportunity to use available executive authorities while also working with Congress where possible. At the Center for American Progress, we look forward to our nation continuing to make progress.

Read the full report (pdf)

Download the executive summary (pdf)

Download the report to e-readers and mobile devices from Scribd

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Megan Smith (health care, education, economic policy) 202.741.6346 or msmith@americanprogress.org

Print: Anna Soellner (foreign policy and security, energy) asoellner@americanprogress.org

Print: Raúl Arce-Contreras (ethnic media, immigration) 202.478.5318 or rarcecontreras@americanprogress.org

Radio: Laura Pereyra 202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org

TV: Andrea Purse 202.741.6250 or apurse@americanprogress.org

Web: Erin Lindsay 202.741.6397 or elindsay@americanprogress.org http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/11/executive_orders.html/#statement


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1shot1kill; 3branchesofgovt; 527; antiamerican; astroturfers; bho44; bhofascism; bhotyranny; bloodoftyrants; cap; clinton; communism; cw2; cwii; cwiiping; dangerous; democrats; donttreadonme; fascism; fundedbysoros; islam; liberalfascism; liberalprogressivism; liberals; nwo; obama; obamaadvisor; obamalegacy; obamatruthfile; obamunism; palin; podesta; powergrab; progressives; radicals; rapeofliberty; sedition; shadowgovernment; shadowparty; socialistdemocrats; soros; spookydude; transitionteam; tyranny; unions; usurper; vanjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-384 next last
To: My Favorite Headache
Our volunteer military better not turn on us...

Sorry to say, but most will "follow orders".

41 posted on 11/18/2010 10:26:03 AM PST by Michael Barnes (Guilty of being White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Okay, Podesta, then we will not “underestimate” anything you say. And don’t ever underestimate the will of the American people.


42 posted on 11/18/2010 10:26:46 AM PST by drierice (The 'stimulus' cost more than 6 years of the Iraq war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
For instance, he protected more great spaces in the lower 48 states than any president since Theodore Roosevelt

Yeah, Clinton presided over a massive Federal land grab. Podesta obviously believes that's a good thing, because his vision of Government is as a despotic, arbitrary power that rules a People, not an organization that humbly enacts the commands of the People.

43 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:04 AM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Firing on our own citizens was stated to be considered an illegal order.
Then there are also laws against such actions...


44 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:10 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: My Favorite Headache
Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”
Buy an eclectic car or we will gun you down?

Buy health care or we will put you in front of the firing squad?

Dirty Harry Voice: Swell

46 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:13 AM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I believe that the Army cannot discharge soldiers simply because they are HIV+. They cannot deploy them, either.


47 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:14 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I am opposing openly gay in the military.


48 posted on 11/18/2010 10:27:47 AM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Did you add that acronym onto the title?


49 posted on 11/18/2010 10:28:06 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I SAY BRING IT ON, PODESTA!

FORCE YOUR PUPPET PRESIDENT OBAMA TO DO YOU WISHES!

WE KNOW THAT IT’S NOT REALLY A FREUDIAN SLIP WHEN OBAMA TOLD HIS SUPPORTERS TO “PUNISH YOUR [US] ENEMY”!


50 posted on 11/18/2010 10:28:52 AM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

“PAGING HENRY BOWMAN!”

Surely this is an unintended consequence of my post! :)


51 posted on 11/18/2010 10:29:05 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Okers.
The wording of the second half of your post didn’t sound like it.
*shrugs*
Been a long day on my end.


52 posted on 11/18/2010 10:29:13 AM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Lets hope about as long as it would take tanks and gunships to surround the white house, and hang that scumbag..


53 posted on 11/18/2010 10:29:30 AM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Ubanga better make damn sure where the military’s loyalties are before he tries to sic armed forces on Americans.


54 posted on 11/18/2010 10:29:49 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Will this be the refurbished Armed Forces...after the (Dream) Nightmare Act, that allows ILLEGALS into our military?


55 posted on 11/18/2010 10:30:59 AM PST by Jane Long (2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

“Can anyone recall someone who has worked directly with the President on a day to day basis advising the use of military on its own people? What other time in history has this counsel been given?”

Just take a look at the US government’s response to unions and strikes in the 19th Century. Not to mention their response to the Bonus Army in the early 20th. It has been done. Repeatedly.


56 posted on 11/18/2010 10:30:59 AM PST by Old Student
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeChris
"Don't worry, did you read the replies?"

Whew, someone wrote words. That was a close one.


57 posted on 11/18/2010 10:31:57 AM PST by I see my hands (How's that ballot box working out for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I have warned conservatives many times that the communist playbook calls for crushing their enemies physically.

You have, indeed, fellow patriot and so have I and others who understand the menace of communism, Stalinism and the other oppressive isms. These people must be exposed and stopped...

58 posted on 11/18/2010 10:31:57 AM PST by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I think The Blaze is overstating things. Never hurts to be prepared, but based on being in and around the military since 1970, I cannot imagine our uniformed heroes / heroines ‘turning against us.’ Let not your heart be troubled.


59 posted on 11/18/2010 10:32:21 AM PST by tgusa (Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Go for it you A-Hole, Podesta. If you want a real war you are about to get just that!

Now we know where Clinton got his support and “understanding” of the laws/rules when he pushed through so much crap. Thanks, Podesata, you creep.


60 posted on 11/18/2010 10:33:01 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-384 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson