Firing on our own citizens was stated to be considered an illegal order.
Then there are also laws against such actions...
Not if martial law was declared, as it was declared immediately after the electronic run on the bank in Sept of 2008.
But a lot of unconstitutional stuff can happen without shots actually being fired, and the precedent set with Lakin’s trial is that the Constitutionality of the order has no impact on whether the individual soldier has to obey it. Judge Denise Lind used a DIFFERENT set of criteria for determining the lawfulness of Lakin’s order - didn’t even reference the elements of Article 92. That is precisely how judges, through precedential decisions, can write a law out of existence. And it is being done right now.
It has been in the works for some time. And now Podesta accidentally revealed the end-goal of it. The coup that put Obama in power is not going to stop being a coup just because it’s in power. The original intent was to destroy this country and wherever the coup’s camel-nose gets under the tent it will flip everything and turn the rule of law on its head.
If the military accepts lawlessness, as the Lakin case suggests, then the military will become the worst tool in the hands of lawless men.
And now you understand why President Bush did NOT break the posse comitatus law during Katrina.
Imagine if that precedent had been used by Bush.
> Firing on our own citizens was stated to be considered an
> illegal order.
> Then there are also laws against such actions...
Laws and arcane legalities mean nothing to these people.
They are revolutionary communists.
Now that they once again have the reins of power, and the command of the military, they are not likely to let go.
Clinton was careful about the Congress.
These anti-American criminals are not.