Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
I just found this at Gateway Pundit. A judge just ruled in the Alaska Senate race. Isnt this now precedent that could require Obama to reveal his records if he runs in 2012???
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
MURKOWSKI JUDICIAL APPOINTEE ORDERS PRIVATE DOCUMENTS ON JOE MILLER TO BE RELEASED
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, October 23, 2010, 10:52 PM
I HOLD THAT ALTHOUGH MR. MILLER HAS A LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN THOSE DOCUMENTS, MR. MILLERS RIGHT TO PRIVACY IS INDEED OUTWEIGHED BY THE PUBLICS SIGNIFICANT INTEREST IN THE BACKGROUND OF A PUBLIC FIGURE WHO IS RUNNING FOR THE U.S. SENATE, the judge said. A U.S. senator, he noted, is among the highest elected offices in the nation.
It's just like, nah: "Bill Ayers is just a guy living in my neighborhood." BTW, it is/was NOT my letter, but a "colleague"(?) of yours, why would I ever be surprise???
How in the world does the GOP "leadership"(?) allows this political, ---and pardon me my french quote from Jerry Brown's camp---WHORE to take center stage in Alaska and the nation in general?
Last night my wife watched the hilarious movie "Legally Blond2" where Ellie Wood goes to Washington, and it reminds us how corrupt politicians are to keep their power at all cost...screw the constituents big time!!!
Saturday Night Live Harry Reid Rally
SNL spoofing Obama, at campaign rally for Harry Reid,
If you were born in this country, why dont you release your birth certificate?
Obama says Youre right, I should
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
http://www.youtube.com/user/zutko55#p/u/6/uBC0RzcI5ww
The denials I’ve seen have been based on 338-18 part b, with no mention of the UIPA. Feel free to show otherwise. You suggested they interpret the part of the UIPA that I quoted differenty from what it says, but you haven’t actually shown this to be the case.
Question number two: Has the Attorney General of Hawai’i ordered the Department of Health to release a copy of Obama’s original long form under a UIPA request?
I’m sorry, but I think you must have intended to ping someone else.
Because, y’see, I asked for evidence supporting Danae’s claim that Hawaii regularly handed out domestic birth certificates to foreign-born kids back around the time of Obama’s birth.
Ladysforest, you suggested I viewed two videos that had absolutely nothing to do with foreign kids getting Hawaiian birth certificates, and STARWISE, you put up a 1000-word post that at least was on-topic, but still didn’t cite any evidence that Hawaii regularly gave out birth certificates saying ‘Born in Hawaii’. In particular, notice that none of the material you cited actually says that Hawaii will issue a certificate saying ‘Born in Hawaii’ to a kid not born in Hawaii.
So really, neither of you gave anything close to a positive answer to the question. Either there’s evidence supporting the claim, or there’s not. Either Danae is basing her claim on a reliable source that said that Hawaii regularly handed out such certificates, or she just made it up because it just *seemed* possible, and then she presented it as though it were an actual fact.
It looks to me like Danae’s claim is nothing more than rampant speculation, not actual fact, as it is presented. And if y’all had any evidence supporting it, I’d tend to think you would have cited it yourselves, instead of dancing around a straight answer or attempting to change the subject.
In an honest moment by former judge and congressman Alcee Hastings, “We just make c*%! up.”
Video demonstrates that Factcheck.org lied about what DR. Chiyome Fukino said in her official press release of October 31, 2008. Also three other statements by the Officials at the Hawaii Department of Health, lead us to believe that the Certification of Live Birth, posted online by Obama is a forgery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Iy8i61DmAg
Now, in regards to the lack of confirmation of Obamas online Certification of live birth (not a CERTIFICATE of live birth, commonly known as a birth CERTIFICATE)we will hear objections that Hawaii was protecting theprivacy of Obama by not confirming that the document that he posted online, mirrored the records Hawaii had of said document.
However, how would that defend Obamas privacy if he, himself (people under his direction and control) had placed the document with the obvious intention to be viewed by the public?
And further, if privacy were an issue, he could easily grant Hawaii permission to state that, in fact, said document mirrors the document(S)they have at the HDOH?
STE=Q
For more than a year, the Department of Health has continued to receive approximately 50 e-mail inquiries a month seeking access to President Barack Obamas birth certificate IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS POSTED A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ON HIS FORMER CAMPAIGN WEBSITE. Hawaii is a ‘closed records’ state, meaning that vital records are available only to those with a direct and tangible interest as defined by statute; hence, they are not subject to disclosure under public records requests.
Any judge in America where Barack Hussein Obama’s name appeared on a presidential ballot could issue a subpoena for Obama’s original birth records and under Hawai’i law, the Department of Health would honor releasing the vital records to: “a person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by AN ORDER OF A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION.”
—Hawai’i Revised Statutes 339-18(b)(9)
I find it fascinating that NO interested parties like John McCain, Sarah Palin, the Republican National Committee, 41 Republican Senators and any of 178 Republican members of the House of Representatives or any of 23 Republican Governors have sought such a subpoena from a friendly judge.
Even more interesting is the fact that no major conservative, constitutional law firm has bothered to find the right plaintiff with legal standing to challenge Obama’s eligibility.
All the major conservative constitutional law firms have stayed away from this issue.
Im sorry, but I think you must have intended to ping someone else.
Because, ysee, I asked for evidence supporting Danaes claim that Hawaii regularly handed out domestic birth certificates to foreign-born kids back around the time of Obamas birth.
Ladysforest, you suggested I viewed two videos that had absolutely nothing to do with foreign kids getting Hawaiian birth certificates, and STARWISE, you put up a 1000-word post that at least was on-topic, but still didnt cite any evidence that Hawaii regularly gave out birth certificates saying Born in Hawaii. In particular, notice that none of the material you cited actually says that Hawaii will issue a certificate saying Born in Hawaii to a kid not born in Hawaii.
So really, neither of you gave anything close to a positive answer to the question. Either theres evidence supporting the claim, or theres not. Either Danae is basing her claim on a reliable source that said that Hawaii regularly handed out such certificates, or she just made it up because it just *seemed* possible, and then she presented it as though it were an actual fact.
It looks to me like Danaes claim is nothing more than rampant speculation, not actual fact, as it is presented. And if yall had any evidence supporting it, Id tend to think you would have cited it yourselves, instead of dancing around a straight answer or attempting to change the subject.
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama Birthers that are more like threats, explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obamas campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. If you were born in Bali, for example, Okubo explained, you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. YOU COULD NOT GET A CERTIFICATE SAYING YOU WERE BORN IN HONOLULU. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But its become very clear that it doesnt matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? Its just become an urban legend at this point.
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-movement-picks-up-steam
Well isn’t that what the DOJ/Holder’s SP brigade are doing here all the time, especially Ms. “WKA” and his/her enabler???
(Disclaimer: The following may not make me popular—oh well—here goes anyway!)
El Sordo said:
“On the back side of the copy of her long form there is a readable transfer of ink from the receipt forming a mirror image of where they had been in contact.”
Danae, if you could just please snap a photo of this within a reasonable time frame (like less than an hour), I would be so grateful! Obviously, it would be impossible for the HDOH to mail the photocopy of your BC and receipt with the mailing address behind the photocopy of the birth certificate. After all, they did arrive in an envelope with a window and the mailing address is printed directly on the receipt according to your photos.
Folks, please look at this photo and put that receipt behind the BC and put it in the envelope with your mind. Where is the mailing address?http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g172/Danae_photos/IMG_0591.jpg
Why, it’s right here, on the receipt behind the Photocopy of the BC? http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g172/Danae_photos/IMG_0592.jpg
Come on. This story is pure invention, El Sordo.
In fact, a quick eyeballing of the photos shows it would be impossible for that receipt to have ever been folded up BEHIND the photocopy of that birth certificate. The folds on the receipt are just too far apart. As a graphic designer, I am aware that when ink transfers during mailing, it’s a result of the sorter machines.
It’s been three days since this was posted and there has been no correction from Danae or El Sordo if he was mistaken. But if for some reason the ‘ink transfer’ came from the TONER on the photocopy of the birth certificate and was transferred to the back of the receipt—please post a photo of that, too! I want to “read” it.
I mean, Danae’s COLB is basically the only COLB propping up the ‘Date Filed By...’ language also found on Obama’s COLB and this story doesn’t hold water. It’s important to verify these claims. Or not. Why are you lending credibility to Danae’s BC story with an outright lie, El Sordo? Hmm?
This is not about some silly bet that Danae could obtain an uncertified copy of her long form—this is about verifying there’s nothing unusual about her long form that would cause her ‘certification’ to read ‘Date Filed By Registrar.’
And don’t get me started on the State Registrar acceptance ‘date stamp’ on that long form. A comparison with 26 other ‘date stamps’ from 1927-1981 shows that only Danae’s are inconsistent. I can provide a visual aid to help you understand this: http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/9213/danaescertstampfinal2.jpg
Why are yours so very different, Danae? Contrary to what you claim, something is unique about your birth certificate: the date stamps. Why?
I am sorry, but what the heck is going on here? Maybe I don’t really want to know.
I really struggled to just keep my mouth shut on this, but I can’t watch Danae and El Sordo and other unsuspecting people fall all over themselves about their humility and the truthfulness behind this stupid, stupid situation. There’s lies all right. Lots of them.
Of course I expect people to think and believe as they please—but personally, I don’t give this Birth Certificate and the ‘Certification of Live Birth’ any credibility—too many weird variables....I know that some of you who I included on this list KNOW what I am talking about.
Anyway, I just had to speak up on it. Sorry, Danae. Something stinks here.
[end rant]
Just look at the next post after yours, you just wonder WHY???
says who?
From an old FreeRepublic thread on this issue
Can we stop it with the idiotic conspiracy theories? They make Republicans look bad and will help Obama get re-elected. Im an attorney. Keeping your license is a pain the ass you have to take 2 dozen useless classes every two years (Continuing Legal Education) and pay a steep fee. So lawyers who stop practicing law let their license lapse. Thats what Michelle Obama did. No story. Move along.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308476/posts
What Fukino didn't say here is that the "copy of the certificate" is genuine and unaltered.
Hawaii Officials Lie For Obama
Hawaii is a closed records state, meaning that vital records are available only to those with a direct and tangible interest as defined by statute; hence, they are not subject to disclosure under public records requests.
Hawaii will do everything they can to - stall, BS, lose paperwork, and lie - to applicants who request documents instead of complying with this law:
§338-13 Certified copies. (a) Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.
(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department, certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18.
(c) Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printout or other process approved by the director of health. [L 1949, c 327, §17; RL 1955, §57-16; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-13; am L 1978, c 49, §1]"
LoL!
Being a progressive means you support communism/facism, so you can be neither a free thinker or a constitutionalist.
But, to my point. I have NEVER requested to be on ANY ping list of yours that I can recall and here on FR we request to be on a PING list, NOT just added to one. It is considered RUDE.
my apologies I copied your name in error.
Unless everyone on that list has requested to be on your ping list you should not be pinging any of them.
Considering your communist/facist beliefs.
The SP Soros troll thinks if he can be the last post on a thread "he wins!" Nonsense.
His/her “clone” twins are hard at work this weekend, while he/she is taking a break from all the hard “work” or maybe not eligible for week-end pay, it’s just amazing to all the energy put in here to cover up for their usurper leader. Can you believe it???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.