Skip to comments.
Freaky Physics Proves Parallel Universes Exist
Foxnews.com ^
| April 5, 2010
| John Brandon
Posted on 04/06/2010 1:03:26 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 last
To: AU72
I think we’re ALL bozos on this bus
141
posted on
04/06/2010 5:47:19 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
To: TigersEye
That's just a fancy way of saying...
"I wish I had combed my hair and shaved first." ;^)
Well, I'll go so far as the combed my hair part. Or the parted my hair part. As a female, however, I'm still a few years off from having to start the face shaving-- I hope! Or at least I can hope that the cascading images growing infinitely smaller and smaller will obscure any annoying chinny chin chin hairs.
;-)
142
posted on
04/06/2010 6:35:55 PM PDT
by
green pastures
(Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
I would like to go to a universe with no Obama, no Muslims, and a 500 mile wide sea between the US and Mexico.
To: GiovannaNicoletta
I already posted this article next week.
144
posted on
04/06/2010 6:47:46 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: green pastures
Universes with perpendicular parking generally don't have a well-developed car culture . . .
145
posted on
04/06/2010 6:58:54 PM PDT
by
Hunton Peck
(If someone asked a hypothetical question, would you answer it?)
To: green pastures
ROTFLOL My apologies for an embarrassing assumption and kudos to your sense of humor. May you have perfect facial smoothness in all universes. Except the ones where it’s considered attractive. And the ones where you are a male. And the ones where we are feathered like birds, the ones where we have scales, the ones where we have exoskeletons, the ones ... well, you get the idea.
146
posted on
04/06/2010 7:11:33 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Duncan Hunter, Jim DeMint, Michelle Bachman, ...)
To: TigersEye
Thanks— I think. ;-)
Gotta say I’d never considered the exoskeleton angle before now.
Hmm. Eww. That’s almost as bad as the ones where we look like Helen Thomas. (Or perhaps, that’s redundant...)
;-)
147
posted on
04/06/2010 7:24:26 PM PDT
by
green pastures
(Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
To: Hunton Peck
Well, that’s certainly another angle to consider... LOL
Btw, your tag line reminds me of one of my favorite quotations— “What if there were no hypothetical situations?”
148
posted on
04/06/2010 7:27:49 PM PDT
by
green pastures
(Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
To: DungeonMaster
But there are serial universes.
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
151
posted on
04/07/2010 4:09:54 AM PDT
by
plinyelder
("I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: Jim Scott
Nice try. I was referring to theories that pertain to creation, such as the parallel universe theory. ...but of course, you knew that. You miss the point. But, that is not unexpected.
152
posted on
04/07/2010 5:36:09 AM PDT
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: Some hope remaining.
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
154
posted on
08/04/2010 8:24:15 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
There is an even more interesting possibility.
When you think about it, locality has basically been destroyed by the work of Bell and his inequality.
But Bell’s inequalities, and the quantum entanglement that result, cannot be said to be confined only to the spacial dimensions - ot must be admitted that entanglement in the time dimension could exist as well.
So what happens this instant COULD affect or change something in the future... or the past!
As far as I understand it, anyways.
155
posted on
08/04/2010 8:29:22 PM PDT
by
djf
(They ain't "immigrants". They're "CRIMMIGRANTS"!!!!)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
The Bible showed there are ‘parallel universes’ way back in the Book of Daniel, chapter five. The ‘proof’ was visible to Belshazzar and his entire palace party central. Scared him so bad his knees knocked together!
156
posted on
08/05/2010 6:14:32 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
To: MEGoody
The Bible already ‘proved’ time travel ... Jesus shows up in the Old Testament, centuries BEFORE He was born in Bethlehem.
157
posted on
08/05/2010 6:16:18 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
Bullshyte.
There is no “time travel”, there are no Parallel Universes in the Matrix....
No Big Foot or little green men at area 51.
And human reproduction still requires a Male and a Female.
Or as the Geico Drill Sergreant/Therapist might say:
REALITY - Observe it and deal with with, ya Jackwagons.
158
posted on
08/05/2010 8:13:20 AM PDT
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: LomanBill
>>REALITY - Observe it and deal with with, ya Jackwagons.
REALITY - Observe it and deal with IT, ya Jackwagons.
159
posted on
08/05/2010 8:20:53 AM PDT
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
I’ll have to check the actual paper.
No one has seen a parallel universe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson