Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stupak [NRO report]
National Review Online ^ | 3/19/2010 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 03/19/2010 5:14:32 PM PDT by mathprof

Stupak evidently met with Pelosi tonight. And has a press conference scheduled for the morning ... On my Twitter feed, I see Diana DeGette (radical liberal feminist, if you need a broadbrush label — Yuval wrote everything you ever need to read about her a few years ago here) is not happy.

My understanding if a fix were to happen via an enrollment corrections bill, the Senate would have to pass it first. I would think Barbara Boxer would sooner give up her seat (which she might have to) than allow that happen ... for one thing.

UPDATE:

Here's how CNN is reporting it:

Washington (CNN) - The divisive issue of abortion is once again causing eleventh hour problems for House Democrats as they plan to move forward on health care reform.

Anti-abortion Democrat Bart Stupak of Michigan is asking for a vote on his language restricting taxpayer funding for abortion, and a group of female abortion rights Democrats came out of an emergency meeting in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office Friday evening visibly angry about the prospect.

Rep. Diana Degette, D-Colorado, told reporters a vote on Stupak's measure was a "non starter" and said "somewhere between 40 and 55" abortion rights Democrats would bolt from the bill.

"We are holding firm this time," she insisted. "If Mr. Stupak and a few members along with the Republicans decide to use this to take health care down, that loss of health care will be in their hands."

It's not yet clear how seriously Democratic leaders are considering allowing a vote on Stupak's abortion language, or in what form.

But Stupak told CNN he is in discussions with Pelosi.

"We had a good discussion with the speaker on the floor," said Stupak. "But there was no agreement and there's no agreement until we see it in writing and we get a chance to massage it."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: bohica; healthcare; michigan; obamacare; stupak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Interesting.
1 posted on 03/19/2010 5:14:32 PM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mathprof
"If Mr. Stupak and a few members along with the Republicans decide to use this to take health care down, that loss of health care will be in their hands."

What loss?
2 posted on 03/19/2010 5:16:41 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

But...but...but...I just read they had a vote check on the floor and they’ve got 222 commie piggies agreeing to vote yes. More BS from the state run “media”?


3 posted on 03/19/2010 5:16:59 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (How much did your congressman's vote go for? Mine got two bits. Her going price.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

oh please, someone hold open the flaps of the GOP’s big tent


4 posted on 03/19/2010 5:17:07 PM PDT by silverleaf ("Congress is America's only native criminal class."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
"If Mr. Stupak and a few members along with the Republicans decide to use this to take health care down, that loss of health care will be in their hands."

From your mouth to G-d's ear! Please! I want that on my hands!

5 posted on 03/19/2010 5:17:54 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Call the local offices of Congresscritters. They are still answering the phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

The abortion language will vanish.


6 posted on 03/19/2010 5:17:54 PM PDT by Shaun_MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shaun_MD

He’ll probably sell out to get a vote that ends up meaning nothing.


7 posted on 03/19/2010 5:18:56 PM PDT by gthog61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
Anti-abortion Democrat Bart Stupak of Michigan

On the question of defunding Planned Parenthood, Stupak voted "noe."

8 posted on 03/19/2010 5:19:02 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (let the rich eat the rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

The problem that they have is that they can’t promise anything substantial without sending it back to the Senate.

Any promise Pelosi or Reid or Obama makes is just empty words. So the question is, does Stupak want something firm or does he want a fig leaf?


9 posted on 03/19/2010 5:19:32 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for, it matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

I would not want to “massage” any thing of the Speaker’s.


10 posted on 03/19/2010 5:19:55 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gthog61
He’ll probably sell out to get a vote that ends up meaning nothing.

The "capitalists" here could only applaud him for holding out for the highest bidder.

11 posted on 03/19/2010 5:20:02 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (let the rich eat the rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Methinks, the Stupack bloc is about to fold. :-(


12 posted on 03/19/2010 5:20:09 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
"If Mr. Stupak and a few members along with the Republicans decide to use this to take health care down, that loss of health care will be in their hands."

And they will be cheered as heroes by 70 percent of the population.

13 posted on 03/19/2010 5:20:18 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ("When the national government and Congress start going wild, it's up the states to rein them in.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shaun_MD

I don’t understand unless Nancy is trying to lay the Bill failure on the Senate. We need more info on how this would work. If the Senate has to pass it, then we are in good shape cause it won’t happen and this would have Reid take the grenade in which the pin has already been pulled.


14 posted on 03/19/2010 5:20:25 PM PDT by rlbedfor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

If they change the bill, back to the Senate.


15 posted on 03/19/2010 5:20:35 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Don’t go wobbly.


16 posted on 03/19/2010 5:21:18 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
Hey Bart, the entire bill is socialist and unconstitutional.

What more is there to talk about?

17 posted on 03/19/2010 5:21:35 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Hurry Nancy! Break out the Slaughter rule!


18 posted on 03/19/2010 5:22:06 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

“Rep. Diana Degette, D-Colorado, told reporters a vote on Stupak’s measure was a “non starter” and said “somewhere between 40 and 55” abortion rights Democrats would bolt from the bill.

“We are holding firm this time,” she insisted. “If Mr. Stupak and a few members along with the Republicans decide to use this to take health care down, that loss of health care will be in their hands.”
++++++++++++++++

I see nothing wrong with that! Woohoo, if that happens...


19 posted on 03/19/2010 5:23:22 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Nazi Pelosi wouldn’t be wasting her precious time working over Stupak if she had the votes locked up.


20 posted on 03/19/2010 5:23:27 PM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson