Posted on 09/10/2009 9:42:35 PM PDT by moonpie57
I just talked to Orly:
She has 2 good news items that she is very busy with right now:
1. Judge Carter is ‘giving her expedited discovery - immediately’.
2. Judge Land will allow her to present before the court in GA. She is leaving now to fly to GA to appear before Judge Land at the Federal Building in Columbus, GA at 2:00 pm tomorrow (Friday, 9/11/09).
She would like as many military supporters to be there as possible. I called Carl Swensson (RiseUpForAmerica.com), and he will see what he can do. If you have any contacts there, please advise them.
(Excerpt) Read more at resistnet.com ...
The second doc. is an unsigned “Proposed” version of an order that DOJ filed moving all plaintiff discovery be restricted to only issues directly related to the motion to dismiss. If I’m not mistaken, this is on the docket, but it has not been put into effect with yet by the magistrate judge.
The Third doc is the full text of the motion by the defense/DOJ that plaintiff discovery be limited for now to include only items directly related to the defense's motion to dismiss.
Yes? No? Help?
Editing your post for legibility...
I found this letter to WND that explains the problem between Dr. Orly and Kreep:
To: “Jerome Corsi”
Cc: “Orly Taitz, Atty OC” , “Jan Herron, CO”
Mr. Corsi, sorry I missed your call yesterday. My phone went nuts after the hearing.
I want to set the record straight about Mr. Drake, Mr. Robinson, and their attorney Mr. Creep being granted permission to adjoin their case to ours.
Yes, I am one of 48 plaintiffs in this case and I was one of the first to sign on.
So far 46 of us have supported Ms. Taitz in her lawsuit. Only 2 plaintiffs have withdrawn and have been causing trouble and distraction by trying to hire a new attorney and sneak back into OUR case. They should have filed their own lawsuit, but they chose to selfishly make waves along with Kreep and his associates.
Yesterday’s antics at the hearing by Kreep were disgusting and documented well in this media post:
7 of us plaintiff witnesses were there to support Orly and we all rejected Kreep coming into the case during the break to “work it out”. But Kreep refused to back down of course.
The judge let him back in ONLY in the name of time and expediency otherwise Kreep and his clients would have been told to take a hike and file their own suit. We all witnessed it and the transcripts would clearly show it. Kreep and his clients got very lucky, but no they just need to let this move forward.
So, here’s where we are (and your future reporting needs to reflect these REALITIES if you keep mentioning Gary Kreep)
1. Yes, Kreep has technically been allowed to enter the case as “co-counsel”, but -
2. Kreep only represents 2 plaintiffs out of 48. Most of the rest of us have retained Ms. Taitz as our attorney and do not recognize Kreep as lead counsel or even co-counsel. He’s just a secondary or sub attorney on the case. Orly is lead counsel and will make all final, binding decisions on behalf of us plaintiffs.
Any further attempts to delay these proceedings by Mr. Kreep (he delayed a hearing yesterday from Sept. 11 to Oct. 5), will not be tolerated and we will take all necessary legal action to stop any more of his antics.
3. Ms. Taitz has a large team of experienced attorneys assisting her now. If Mr. Kreep remains on this case he will be expected to give his professional input, but defer to OUR lead attorney, Ms. Taitz and not argue with her in open court.
4. As you may or may not be aware, Mr. Kreep has a horrible reputation in Southern California among grass-roots activists and Patriot groups. His latest court gimmick yesterday was just another in a long string of selfish games that Kreep has been playing.
Everyone is on to him here and watching his every move from now on. He will be tarred and feathered if he in any way hurts our case. His days of damaging Ms. Taitz’ efforts to get to the truth are OVER!
Just a friendly warning to those who continue to support and promote Gary Kreep in this case.
On behalf of the veteran plaintiffs, Jeff Schwilk MSgt, USMC (Retired) Bcc: Plaintiffs
Beck may be onto another Canada Free Press Story that they were working with North East Intelligence.
They have documents and testimony of Major News anchors from major Networks that were threatened by Obama Adminstraion staff, NOT to bring up the BC or Natural Born Citizen issue.
great interview in archives at Laurie Roth (3 hours long), but I highly recommend it. They state that they are storing documents in the US and copies in Canada, and maybe one other Country, if I remember correctly. The investigator is no amateur.
part 1
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3
part 2
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3
part 3
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3
and Northeast Intelligence intro and documentation at link
“4 August 2009: Do you remember Watergate? Thirty-five years ago this Sunday, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon submitted his letter of resignation for his role in the scandal. There was the crime - the break-in, and then there was the cover-up by the Nixon administration. There were threats, media manipulation and disinformation. It was the cover-up more than the crime itself in the aftermath of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall of the Nixon administration. It was a politically critical time for our country, but we survived because of the strength of the U.S. constitution. “
http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2966
FYI, all you needed to do to fix that jammed up post was to use your space bar. No HTML required.
I separated it for legibility upthread.
best,
WF
Yes
sorry, I did miss that. My mistake.
Thanks, windflier and the others who re-formatted it
so we don’t go blind.
patriot .. I’d suggest you go to that post and
hit the ‘report abuse’ tab at that post and ask
the Mods to remove it.
At least twice today.
Yes.
1. Judge Carter merely referred the motion filed by the Plaintiffs (Taitz) to the Magistrate Judge who will preside over discovery when/if it is granted. He did not order expedited discovery at this time.
2. The defendants filed a motion with a proposed order to limit discovery. In (most) federal courts, when filing a motion or an opposition, the parties (attorneys) have to file a proposed order. It’s merely a matter of following the rules of this specific court to file a ‘proposed’ order and means absolutely nothing until the judge rules on and signs one of the proposed orders (or one drafted by the judge).
It’s getting to be the case way too often that what is actualy said/done by a judge is misinterpreted, getting folks hopes up when all that’s really happened is following the slow procedures of the court.
When did Glenn say that? I thought he said the "big" story was the ACORN story that aired today? Or, is this a new story that he's now referencing? I certainly hope so!!
WHY? No one has gotten anywhere, and he is arrogant and it is probably not what most think.
Fred, I searched back, and I believe this is the first time I realized there were two different Pelosi-signed DNC certifications of BHO/Biden from the Aug 08 convention:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2304218/posts?page=173#173
o’reilly saw the Certification of Live Birth, which can be obtained on parental or grandparental affidavit. If concerned about a potential custody battle for your grandchild born in a foreign land...to what ends would you go?
The author did NOT excerpt correctly what the supposed docs say, FWIW. Look at Democratic vs Democrat.
A reply on the thread from the original poster:
There was no hearing today, Judge Carter examined the evidence, and contacted Orly...This is true, it is verified by Ed Noonan from California and two others through Orlys own mouth.
What do yall know about Edward Noonan?
The words which most stuck with me was him saying this was larger than the health care....larger than anything. Hyperbole????I do not know, but it got my attention.
You've been here since 2004, and you're asking what a ping is?
Don't stop in much, I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.