Editing your post for legibility...
I found this letter to WND that explains the problem between Dr. Orly and Kreep:
To: “Jerome Corsi”
Cc: “Orly Taitz, Atty OC” , “Jan Herron, CO”
Mr. Corsi, sorry I missed your call yesterday. My phone went nuts after the hearing.
I want to set the record straight about Mr. Drake, Mr. Robinson, and their attorney Mr. Creep being granted permission to adjoin their case to ours.
Yes, I am one of 48 plaintiffs in this case and I was one of the first to sign on.
So far 46 of us have supported Ms. Taitz in her lawsuit. Only 2 plaintiffs have withdrawn and have been causing trouble and distraction by trying to hire a new attorney and sneak back into OUR case. They should have filed their own lawsuit, but they chose to selfishly make waves along with Kreep and his associates.
Yesterday’s antics at the hearing by Kreep were disgusting and documented well in this media post:
7 of us plaintiff witnesses were there to support Orly and we all rejected Kreep coming into the case during the break to “work it out”. But Kreep refused to back down of course.
The judge let him back in ONLY in the name of time and expediency otherwise Kreep and his clients would have been told to take a hike and file their own suit. We all witnessed it and the transcripts would clearly show it. Kreep and his clients got very lucky, but no they just need to let this move forward.
So, here’s where we are (and your future reporting needs to reflect these REALITIES if you keep mentioning Gary Kreep)
1. Yes, Kreep has technically been allowed to enter the case as “co-counsel”, but -
2. Kreep only represents 2 plaintiffs out of 48. Most of the rest of us have retained Ms. Taitz as our attorney and do not recognize Kreep as lead counsel or even co-counsel. He’s just a secondary or sub attorney on the case. Orly is lead counsel and will make all final, binding decisions on behalf of us plaintiffs.
Any further attempts to delay these proceedings by Mr. Kreep (he delayed a hearing yesterday from Sept. 11 to Oct. 5), will not be tolerated and we will take all necessary legal action to stop any more of his antics.
3. Ms. Taitz has a large team of experienced attorneys assisting her now. If Mr. Kreep remains on this case he will be expected to give his professional input, but defer to OUR lead attorney, Ms. Taitz and not argue with her in open court.
4. As you may or may not be aware, Mr. Kreep has a horrible reputation in Southern California among grass-roots activists and Patriot groups. His latest court gimmick yesterday was just another in a long string of selfish games that Kreep has been playing.
Everyone is on to him here and watching his every move from now on. He will be tarred and feathered if he in any way hurts our case. His days of damaging Ms. Taitz’ efforts to get to the truth are OVER!
Just a friendly warning to those who continue to support and promote Gary Kreep in this case.
On behalf of the veteran plaintiffs, Jeff Schwilk MSgt, USMC (Retired) Bcc: Plaintiffs
Thanks, windflier and the others who re-formatted it
so we don’t go blind.
patriot .. I’d suggest you go to that post and
hit the ‘report abuse’ tab at that post and ask
the Mods to remove it.