Yes.
1. Judge Carter merely referred the motion filed by the Plaintiffs (Taitz) to the Magistrate Judge who will preside over discovery when/if it is granted. He did not order expedited discovery at this time.
2. The defendants filed a motion with a proposed order to limit discovery. In (most) federal courts, when filing a motion or an opposition, the parties (attorneys) have to file a proposed order. It’s merely a matter of following the rules of this specific court to file a ‘proposed’ order and means absolutely nothing until the judge rules on and signs one of the proposed orders (or one drafted by the judge).
It’s getting to be the case way too often that what is actualy said/done by a judge is misinterpreted, getting folks hopes up when all that’s really happened is following the slow procedures of the court.
1. Judge Carter merely referred the motion filed by the Plaintiffs (Taitz) to the Magistrate Judge who will preside over discovery when/if it is granted. He did not order expedited discovery at this time.
2. The defendants filed a motion with a proposed order to limit discovery. In (most) federal courts, when filing a motion or an opposition, the parties (attorneys) have to file a proposed order. It’s merely a matter of following the rules of this specific court to file a ‘proposed’ order and means absolutely nothing until the judge rules on and signs one of the proposed orders (or one drafted by the judge).
It’s getting to be the case way too often that what is actualy said/done by a judge is misinterpreted, getting folks hopes up when all that’s really happened is following the slow procedures of the court.
This seems more reasonable. I saw Plains Radio mentioned early on, that is a BIG red flag. Trust NOTHING associated with Plains Radio.