Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
I could have sworn I saw the KF one in PACER. But I didn’t take a screen shot until it hit the SCRBD account. So I can’t go back and check now.
Who did the original upload for SCRBD?
Well, there is one good take-away: Unlike the libtard sites, it took us a mere day and a half to debunk something many of us wanted to be true, and by and large, freepers are admitting it!
Without making a comment on this situation, I do feel obligated to remind everybody that saquin’s sole purpose here is to defend, without fail, anything and everything even remotely related to Lord Obama.
She is, in no uncertain terms, a troll.
Not to me. In fact, I think the 'story' that an amazing Kenyan birth certificate for Obama just miraculously appeared out of the blue sounded a little too lucky. ;-)
There's no mystery about the Australian BC to me. To figure out if any alleged Obama BC is authentic, you first have to rule out it's not a fake and ask yourself how you'd go about making a reasonably passable forgery yourself. The first order of business would be to check out google images for suitable templates the forger might have used, which evidently is where the person who scored the lookalike found it. In fact, I had considered doing the same thing - I just didn't have a big enough block of spare time (or the patience) to start an extended image search.
People here are trying way too hard to believe all the wrong people. All of a sudden Ann Coulter and National Review are 'RINOS' around here (good grief, even James Taranto now!) just because they reject all this crazy BC nonsense peddled by this never-ending parade of oddballs, and yet birthers put completely trusting stock in all these perfect strangers coming out of nowhere who are mysteriously conjuring up all these iffy documents of unknown provenance merely because the alleged 'evidence' fits their predetermined conclusion.
It should be the other way around. Process all the evidence with extreme caution & boundless skepticism first & then reach a conclusion. Treat everything you hear as a potential hoax; it's a lot harder to get caught in them that way.
LOL! Great. If the left is posting all sorts of forgeries to muddy the waters then they must be concerned about something.
Which PDF? The one in the SCRBD or PACER?
This is SO weird ... I have NOT seen one
birthcert with a ‘KF’ yet!! Only seen
EF
It’s not down. I was just there.
The real one is the one that exists in hard copy in the hands of a real person like Orly Taitz. So far all we have of the Bomford one are pixels that we all know now can change right before our eyes.
Ill see what I can find..
Isn’t it hysterical how some folks show up
ONLY for the anti-legit certs ??? ROFL !!!
“As far as the crest is concerned. Don’t forget that Australia was part of Great Britain in 1959, so the crest would that of England. Not Australia. Seems to match this Coat of Arms on this building in England.”
That statement is false:
The Commonwealth of Australia was created on January 1st 1901. The Dominion was granted a distictive set of Arms by His Majesty King Edward VII on May 7th, 1908 (modified by HM King George V on September 19th, 1912.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_Australia
The State of South Australia was granted distinctive arms by HM King Edward VIII in 1936 (modified by HM Queen Elizabeth II in 1984).
http://www.premcab.sa.gov.au/emblems/coatarm1.htm
Their are two sets of arms for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (not England). one set is for use in England and Wales and also in Northern Ireland. The other set is for use in Scotland:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_coat_of_arms_of_the_United_Kingdom
I just copied that. I didn’t translate :)
Here is the ‘Dude’ that wrote it: Also..the page just changed while I was going back and forth folks. The whole format changed!
http://www.politijab.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=2099
I’ve been here 12 years and you’ve been here 3. Stick around a little longer and you’ll see that some of us like to use our brains and be skeptical and some don’t. If you choose to shout “troll” at people who disagree with you, or even who disagree with the prevailing mood on a particular thread, so be it. I don’t care. I say what I believe.
What is the Bomford doc?
I do not know who uploaded the file to scribd.
I have always used PACER. BTW, PACER logs in to the federal court record every time you sign in and what pages you view and download.
For folks who missed the link:
https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=adc629e5-d94b-4bab-8988-13d274db22a1
Is this the guy who “FOUND” the bomford BC
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:koyaan/index?brevity=full;tab=comments
The link to David Jeffrey Bomford's "Certified Copy of Registration of Birth" is about 3/4 of the way down the page (do a browser search (with Internet Explorer it's "Edit+Find") David Jeffrey)).
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/treeconcise.htm
You should land on this paragraph:
"10d I0543 David Jeffrey Bomford, b 10 April 1959 at Adelaide, m 28 Nov 1981 at Somerton Park, South Australia I0546 Amanda Jane Sandover, b 1959, and had issue"
The "b" is the link.
Hmmm ... and I have not seen the document
with K.F. Lavender .. not ONCE... in all
the those posted I’ve seen. Only E.F.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
