Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
The only question that remains then is,,who did she get the BC from?
And why would he fear for his life?
Something is still pretty strange about this whole thing.
Maybe Bomford is a fake?
That’s it!
Planted by the CIA ‘just in case’ Obama was elected in 2008.
:)
“The Imam who came forward to assist in the search of Barack Obama’s identity left Kenya secretly last night, and will arrive in the UK this morning. He will meet with a US contact person who will assist him in recording an asylum statement in the UK after handing over the documents that caused the blessing of Obama when he was born and to confirm the origin of the name Hussein.”
_____________
What? I’m lost. When was this? This sounds like that UPI garbage?
It does NOT show “E.F.”!!!
Zoom in on that image and the “K’ is as clear as day!
I’m using Mac Preview and can Zoom in at least seven different levels, and the “K’ is still obvious. In fact, at Zoom level 6, the “K” is still clearly readable and everything else around it is hopelessly blurred.
I can’t get Photobucket to link the large image I created using Mac “Grab”, or I would in a minute!
Nice work my fellow New Jerseyan.
Do we know when this Bomford one was placed on the web? Maybe its a fake and was planted...
Nevermind. Checked their contact page and new email is web2manager@bomford.net. IT checked out.
Someone want to email Mr. Bomford and ask?
Yep..it looks that way. A google image search of Bomford.net has no image of the BC.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&um=1&q=%22bomford.net%22&sa=N&start=54&ndsp=18
Well, the one posted on the top of this thread, and the one Jimrob and several others saved is a k
OK, wait a minute. Why is the original so much more low-resolution than the supposedly modified version?
Was there a higher-resolution photo of the original that got modified (but the photo of that original apparently wasn’t available to you to post)?
It makes no sense if we’re saying that that top photo was the one that was altered into the higher-resolution, much sharper fake on the bottom photo.
And I can see the difference between the “K” and “E,” but I sure can’t see a “6” instead of an “O” in the number. Even on max zoom level.
No, you have to register with PACER and they charge to download docs.
But you are welcome to:
http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg
Works fine for me.
You said — Take my word for it, Star Traveler, there are no changes.
—
I don’t know about that... this may be the original one and others are changes from this one...
Is This the Source of Obama’s the “Kenyan” Birth Certificate?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307512/posts
I also agree with that. We (family) have been searching to verify the “registry” document alone and keep getting google warnings at numerous sites. Something is going on.
See my number 91 on the “Is This the Source . . . “ thread, replying to a post of a DU challenge to flood the web with fakes and make our heads explode. Mine is fixing to do that, BTW.
The problem I see is that many people are treating this as an “analyst the images” computer exercise. I have seen nothing to indicate than ANY poster has knowledge of the registras for the dates and locations on EITHER of these documents. The names may not match either location but that hasn’t been determined.... heck it hasn’t even been determined when the “Republic Of Kenya” was first used. All of these things are facts, they exist and, if acessible, can be verified .
In fact I am more suspicious that there is something to this, with all this chaff there has to be a target here someplace.
Right but that’s true regardless.
It’s clear to me at least that they’re trying to distract us from something...to deter us from looking...to make us look silly...etc.
The thing is, I think our response was entirely responsible. We were presented a document and we worked it inside and out until we hit a brick wall of irrefutable evidence that strongly suggests (if not demands) that we acknowledge this document to be a fake. Now that we know, we let this one go...but that does not in anyway mean we walk away from this issue.
He’s lying. He’s hiding. He’s trying to keep us from finding out about his past.
We have to be vigilant and press on even while we’re labeled by both the left and the right. We also have to be willing to walk away from a specific incident when it’s proven to be a fake, like this one has.
10d I0543 David Jeffrey Bomford, b 10 April 1959 at Adelaide, m 28 Nov 1981 at Somerton Park, South Australia I0546 Amanda Jane Sandover, b 1959, and had issue
11a I0547 Melissa Jacquelyn Amanda Bomford, b 4 Jul 1983
11b I0548 Karl John David Bomford, b 9 Jul 1984, partner Joanne Bovingdon, had issue
12a Talon Cooper Karl Bomford, b 12 Nov 2007
11c I0549 Kevin Jeffrey Mikael Bomford, b 20 April 1989
11d I0550 Melinda Jasmine Crystal Bomford, b 1991 at Adelaide, d 1991 at Adelaide
11e I0551 Damian Jarrod Owen Bomford, b 1992
Looks like he has a big family.
Here is what i think now. I think the EF is correct. I think they changed it because there is an EF Lavender in Kenya at that time. That’s why they are calling the EF fake. I can’t tell what time I saved mine and I have both copies. One with EF and the other with a K. Orly has the document. She is the only one that can tell us which is fake.
What does it show?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
