Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
This issue looks over.
Heh heh. ;)
Apples and oranges.
You posted a real birth certificate. We have been looking and, not a birth certificate, but a document referring to the birth certificate, Haven’t we?
It is KF posted on Defend our Freedoms and at the top of this thread.
I can blow up the pic on post 52, and see “K.F.” just as clear as day.
Just as clear as can be.
I blow up the one you reference and it IS an “E.F.”
No doubt one is K.F and one is E.F.
The pic you (and the poster from 291 refers to) DOES have E.F.
It is not the fact that my iMac is that much clearer, it is the pic you
have chosen to look at.
This one’s a generation older.
Thanks....pissant. Interesting. Here’s the Whois info on the bomford site:
Domain Name.......... bomford.net
Creation Date........ 2005-02-08
Registration Date.... 2005-02-08
Expiry Date.......... 2010-02-08
Organisation Name.... Richard Bomford
Organisation Address. 25 Berrigan Crescent
Organisation Address.
Organisation Address. OConnor
Organisation Address. 2602
Organisation Address. ACT
Organisation Address. AUSTRALIA
Admin Name........... Richard Bomford
Admin Address........ 25 Berrigan Crescent
Admin Address........
Admin Address........ OConnor
Admin Address........ 2602
Admin Address........ ACT
Admin Address........ AUSTRALIA
Admin Email.......... web1manager@bomford.net
Admin Phone.......... +61.262477959
Admin Fax............
Tech Name............ YahooDomains TechContact
Tech Address......... 701 First Ave.
Tech Address.........
Tech Address......... Sunnyvale
Tech Address......... 94089
Tech Address......... CA
Tech Address......... UNITED STATES
Tech Email........... domain.tech@yahoo-inc.com
Tech Phone........... +1.6198813096
Tech Fax.............
Name Server.......... ns1.serverlinks.net
Name Server.......... ns2.serverlinks.net
I am thinking this is all a trojan horse.
And yes indeed, glad she's seeking authentication.
If you can blow up the picture on post 52 (the top one), it is VERY CLEARLY
a “K.F.”
I’m beginning to wonder if a graphics iMac is that much clearer. :)
Both are extracts. Neither is a birth certificate. The guy was born in 1936, not 1959
Right but then it’s kind of moot now.
Everyone seems to be forgetting that Obama still has not released his long-form birth certificate or other personal background documents. The multiplication of forgeries by whomever will not reduce the demands for those documents. If anything, the demand for originals will get only louder. If the Obamabots think this tactic will help them, they are mistaken.
The doubt about his origins and his leftist agenda will work together to thwart his plans. The middle ground voters he needs to keep will continue to desert him. Ordinary Americans have to show more documents to check out a movie from Blockbuster than Obama showed to become President.
Yesterday, I spent some time looking up the field titles on the fake certificate. I kept getting led to discussions of Australian genealogy. Dang! I gave up too soon. If I'd kept at it, I might have turned up the forger's template last night.
Given the apparent high quality of the fake, I had figured the forger probably started with one or more paper copies of Kenyan birth certificates. But it looks like he just googled up a good quality image of an Australian BC and took it from there.
Since Australia in 1959 was still a part of Great Britain and Kenya was under the control of Britain, I would assume that these forms were standard and generated in London for distribution to Britain’s different holdings at the time.
I really doubt that each area under Britain’s control would have their own forms.
I wish with all my heart the alleged Kenya BC was the real deal however when you look at this one even the book and page number they are identical. It is time to move on.
+++++++++++++++
If this is the template (post #291), then that explains the 7s, 6d currency discrepancy also. It also proves, if true, just how tough it is to counterfeit such a document well. I’d call this one a pretty good fake.
Well this goes back to what we were saying originally...should this be proven a fake (which I think we can safely say it has)...who benefits from this? Who gains from taking the time to set this up?
thanks!
They were both extracted in 1959.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.