Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
Bada Bing Bada Boom!
Good catch, E.G. On top of all of the other evidence ala Photoshop layering, this is a dead giveaway of fakery.
Good job!
That one has K instead of an E.
I cannot make out if it’s a 0 or a 6.
The more I enlarge it, the worse pixellation I get.
One gone. Several to go. :-)
How do you explain the rest of the distortions in the “original” image? (See post 1756, the top portion is from “original”, the bottom is from share.adobe.com)
id you guys see this?? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306983/posts?page=199#199
This got my attention anyway. There is enough information that I think you might actually be able to find a registrats office in Kenya.......
Regarding the K/E controversy. Did Orly Taitz request information about an E.F. Lavender last week? I read that in a post, but I don’t have a source. If so, that would support the supposition that E.F. Lavender is the correct name.
Every little bit helps.
Right. What ever makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
Sounds like we have two differing camps on what the original document contains based on internet images.
The physical paper copy that was submitted by Orly Taitz is now the only verifiable evidence after what I’ve seen take place in these discussions.
It would be enlightening to hear from her directly as to what the actual document number and birth registrar are indicated as on the hard copy she submitted to the court.
Yeah, I didn’t think overt proof of concept, steps to reproduce and obvious evidence would change your mind. You’d RATHER see conspiracy over fact.
lol
So cuz who is she?
That's what I'm asking myself about you. Orly Taitz' credentials need no explaining around here. They're well established. You, on the other hand...
This is a question for all of you.
http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/ has stated that the image for the Bomford BC was uploaded on 8/3/09.
How can someone know this? I didn’t realize that folks could see when a file was uploaded unless they were the ones doing the uploading and noted the time and date in their FTP client.
[oh nuts...here come the eye twitches again]
I found an office in Mombasa.
Just a thought, but photographing the document at an angle makes it a bit harder to tamper with the digital image?
Don't see any distortions that change the horizontal pixels to angles. Can you point any out?
I saw her interviewed. She's a nut.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.