Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
Yes, it always looked clear to me - a defined K. And if the excuse has been that the original E was distorted due to too much compression or whatever then why wasn’t most of the rest of the document also distorted? Is there now, anywhere a K document left and does anyone know if the paper copy of IT exists separately from the paper one that Orly has submitted with the E?
has this been posted?
http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/
check out blog post #2 as well
(ps - I did not write this blog, nor do I know the person - found the blog while searching for info about Bombard)
I just posted his own words.
Post 1691
Someone posted that the data entries for the Obama document was Pica (common in typewriters of that era) and that Courier is the same font. Cursory search online didn’t find any examples of Pica type but did see sites where it could be downloaded as a TrueType font.
The screen capture of the k doc came from the SCRBD site. That upload was suppose to be the docs from PACER. But PACER now shows an E.
Don’t know where the k docs went once the URL was changed.
But he says it came [copied] from a family tree web site that they have.......
I’m sure the guy had a Birth Certificate, but the latest one we see is definitely a forgery. They took the bits out of his real one and put them in the DU issued template.
Easy way to tell. The “District” printed in real documents unrealistically overlays the signature in the forged Australian.
By the way. Someone with access to the family tree website must have been party to it, cos they had to change the original jpg to the new forged one.
The download from her (Orly’s) site that you provided a link to still looks like the alleged fake version with the 47044 document number.
I’m confused now as to what Orly had even originally posted. Was it the version with the 47644 doc number? Is there now a concensus that whatever Orly sumbitted turned out to be fake, or, did her adversaries take her original, modify it to look fake, and then spread it all over the internet to discredit her?
The interview says he was looking at the documents. He even commented on the forged ones.
Yes, he glanced at it and said “That’s me and there’s my mom’s name!”
Kenyon (?) who supposedly *discovered* this document said on his blog that he was browsing around Google images and came up on this document. What a really huge coincedence.
I just don’t know what to think anymore.
Last I heard Orly was in Israel. Can’t wait for the WH thugs to start claiming a JEWISH conspiracy. Watch it WILL happen.
Maybe Mossad has some info....
A likely candidate here:
http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Bomford/791252698#
Check the political affiliations and BIRTHPLACE. Apparently now lives in Kentucky and is an Obama guy.
From about 2/3 of the way down on the Bomford genealogy site http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/treeannotated.htm:
11a I0580 Michael Kondwani Bomford, b 1971 in Zambia, m 2003 Kiersten Eileen Moore, b 1976, and had issue (David Bomford emails 4 Sep 2006)
12a I1425 Liam Evan Bomford-Moore, b 2006 in Kentucky
(By the way, I saved the Bomford GED before they closed the site last night.)
I saw it almost as soon as it was first posted and it was a “0”, not a “6” and “K” was an “E”.
Other than being able to say that, I have no idea.
The rest of the document was distorted. Below is part of the "original" from the image at the top of this thread. Below that is the same area from the image downloaded from the courthouse website.
You’ll have to talk to Cal about that.
You made it too late. Those who downloaded it before you got the k. you got the e.
I think I found answers at the below link:
http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/
Let me know if you agree with their explanation
That is the real version from her website
I'm confused now as to what Orly had even originally posted. Was it the version with the 47644 doc number?
No she posted 47O44. Then someone quickly screen captured it sunday morning and posted it here. It was a poor version with jpg artifacts that made the O look like a 6.
or, did her adversaries take her original, modify it to look fake, and then spread it all over the internet to discredit her?
No the adversaries are not involved with the O to S problem, that was created innocently here. The adversaries are creating other forgeries like the Aussie one to muddy the waters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.