I saw it almost as soon as it was first posted and it was a “0”, not a “6” and “K” was an “E”.
Other than being able to say that, I have no idea.
I think I found answers at the below link:
http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/
Let me know if you agree with their explanation
I think it is pretty clear that “original”, the one at the very top of this thread, is a quick and dirty capture and save or cut, paste and save done early Sunday morning. It has lots of jpg artifacts that distorts many of the letters and numbers. I don’t think there is any other plausible explanation since the real one which we have all seen is much higher quality and not open to any misinterpretation.
Regarding the K/E controversy. Did Orly Taitz request information about an E.F. Lavender last week? I read that in a post, but I don’t have a source. If so, that would support the supposition that E.F. Lavender is the correct name.