Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fake Obama Kenya birth certificate?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate ^ | 08/02/2009

Posted on 08/02/2009 4:56:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

And then one of our moderators spotted this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate

It has several clues, but also there's this question:

Who is E. F. Lavender?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=earth+friendly+lavender&aq=f&oq=&aqi

Earth Friendly Lavender detergent?


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allahpundit; areyouseries; article2section1; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; charlesjohnson; citizenship; edmorrissey; eligibility; fake; hawaii; hillary; hoax; honolulu; hotair; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; lgf; littlegreenfootballs; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; pumas; republicofkenya; taitz; thisishugh; usurper; waitforit; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800801-820821-840 ... 1,181-1,190 next last
To: Marie

It is genius except the code breaker can’t count the alaphabet. I fell for it too. You would not think you have to check the honesty or basic math abilities of a freeper. Alas, you do. ;)


801 posted on 08/03/2009 9:01:47 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Obama’s fathers was not a U. S. citizen, therefore Barack Obama II cannot be a natural born U. S. citizen. It doesn’t really matter where the birth took place.

If this is true, then why do we have soooooo many illegals bearing children here who immediately become "anchor babies?" I don't think the Constitution mentions the nationality of either parent when conferring citizenship on a newborn. Please cite where in the Constitution it makes reference to the parentage of the child.
802 posted on 08/03/2009 9:02:21 AM PDT by PleaDeal (Palin in '12! Built Ford tough not Obama weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Hi, I am sorry that I made the big mistake of spreading news that was not true. My freeper friend who told me Orly was to be on saw this thread title, and took it wrong. She thought Orly was to be on the show but the poster of the thread was actually calling for freepers to call INTO the show to get Cunningham to talk about the Kenyan BC.

http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-chat/2306641/posts

I can understand how she took it wrong, and I most likely would have also had I seen it. I also would have thought that Orly was to be on the show. Sorry.

803 posted on 08/03/2009 9:02:39 AM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies]

To: dools007

Sounds like you are not understanding the important distinction between U. S. Citizenship and Natural Born U. S. Citizenship.

But if both you and your wife are U. S. Citizens, and not dual citizenship holders, then your children are Natural Born U. S. citizens, IMO.

Also IMO, for the most part, the place of birth is a red herring. There are exceptions to that statement, but they are not relevant WRT your family’s situation. Again, IMO.


804 posted on 08/03/2009 9:03:45 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: mono

Poor quality childish diversion.

You need to study up on actual realistic sounding comments.

Sheesh, crappy quality of trolls.


805 posted on 08/03/2009 9:03:56 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
I'm not saying one way or the other and am willing to wait till all of the facts are in.

This one has too many coincidences on one page.

806 posted on 08/03/2009 9:04:46 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Stop meddling in the affairs of countries and individuals Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
IIRC it was right after someone pointed out the 47044

LOL...you're better of keeping track than I but that sounds about right :)

807 posted on 08/03/2009 9:05:08 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Move over NetZero - Obama's in the house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 798 | View Replies]

To: Marie

Would you be so kind as to sum up the meaning of 102181 and it’s origin. Thanks. I seem to have missed this and would appreciate your number codes on fake documents for dummies version.

Thanks!


808 posted on 08/03/2009 9:06:06 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc; LouieFisk

http://www.constitutionnet.org/en/vl/constitution-republic-kenya-1963-amended-2008

http://www.constitutionnet.org/files/Kenyan%20constitution%20amended%202008.pdf

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA, 1963
(as Amended to 2008)
CHAPTER I
The Republic of Kenya
1. Declaration of Republic.
Kenya is a sovereign Republic.
++++++++++++++

I’ve written elsewhere that what matters is not what Media Matters quotes the WaPo as saying about Kenya joining as a “Republic of the British Commonwealth” in 12-1964 [http://mediamatters.org/blog/200908030001], but how Kenya and its government, since its indepedence in 12-1963 referred to itself.

This document reference found by politicalmerc seems to clear that little diddy right up.


809 posted on 08/03/2009 9:06:46 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try BIGOTS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk

I tried to make one up in about 1 minute, but couldn’t. I did find a link to a signature on some doc related to obama’s inauguration, but couldn’t open it on my BlackBerry. But some numerology person could probably gin up something, esp if they are allowed to cheat, too.

What am I talking about? Take 102181. So 1=A, 2=B, etc, right?

1 0 2 1 8 1 is
A ? B A H A.

OK, let 10 be its own number:

10 2 1 8 1
J B A H A

Still not there. OK, ignore the leading 1, take 0 as the letter O:

1 0 2 1 8 1
- O B A H A

Close. Now just transmorgify the H into an M and Viola! It means Obama! Must be fake!


810 posted on 08/03/2009 9:07:59 AM PDT by piytar (Take back the language: Obama axing Chrystler dealers based on political donations is REAL fascism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 773 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.
"Houghton M. - - LouieFisk; A newspaper article from the Times of London, Oct. 9, 1963, using the term Republic of Kenya."

I was addressing the WND article's lack of information on what "appeared to be" identical. If WND has Kenyan BCs from that time, even give or take a month, which makes usage of "Republic Of Kenya" it would solidly address the question in specific due it's singular nature.

Whether this document is authentic or not, we still do not know,

Yeah, I'm taking a wait & see view, the facts will come out sooner or later. Interesting to kick around in the meantime, tho.

but the use of “Republic” does not prove it false.

On the other hand, if it's the only BC in the history of Kenya using the "Republic Of Kenya" at that time, it's my thinking it should be considered quite suspect.
811 posted on 08/03/2009 9:09:35 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk

That’s pretty lacking is specifics, Bruce. e.g. was “Republic Of Kenya” used on a BC at that time? That would settle one major point of debate.
++++++++

Please see my post #809; thanks to politicalmerc.
*************

Also the use of the term “appear to be” leaves a bit of wiggle room in case it’s a fake. If WND would post images of it’s comparsion BCs (or whatever docs it’s using) with the private info blacked out, that would certainly be helpful.
++++++++

I’m hoping they’ll do that. It may also shed light on the numerology concerns people are having..


812 posted on 08/03/2009 9:10:02 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try BIGOTS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 780 | View Replies]

To: luvenbsh
I wonder how long it is going to take to get this moving through the courts. I just love a good ole conspiracy!!!

Sure, you do./s  Welcome to FR by the way.

813 posted on 08/03/2009 9:11:15 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Stop meddling in the affairs of countries and individuals Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
This one has too many coincidences on one page.

Such as?

The one thing I do question is the modern looking fonts on the form it's self, before it is filled in with type. This is one issue I haven't seen proved or debunked yet.

Again I am waiting for all of the info before I decide one way or the other.

At his point though, It caries as much weight as what zer0 has offered for his "proof" of eligibility, IMO.

814 posted on 08/03/2009 9:11:26 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Move over NetZero - Obama's in the house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
... there will have been a big conspiracy between the legal, political and media elite to deceive the public and disobey the rule of law.

Historically, this is one type of issue that often results in millions of deaths.

On the bright side, for the next few centuries, playwrights will earn their supper telling their version of the story.

815 posted on 08/03/2009 9:11:27 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk
Oops that last comment should read "if it's one-of-a-kind with 'The Republic Of Kenya', then it's singular nature should be suspect".
816 posted on 08/03/2009 9:12:06 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 811 | View Replies]

To: PleaDeal

You’re confusing U. S. citizenship with Natural Born U. S. citizenship.

But for the record, I disagree with current U. S. policy that allows anchor babies to receive U. S. citizenship just because their Mexican National parents sneaked across the border in time for the mother to give birth. It wasn’t intended to work that way, but the law has been perverted pver time.


817 posted on 08/03/2009 9:12:50 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies]

To: skr

Salamander is the one who uploaded the new image to Scribd?

Yes, she did blew up a copy of Orly’s document as a favor for a freeper who could not read the posted document. She tried to get rid of the “ugly tablecloth” from the image.

God bless whatever’s a mess.


818 posted on 08/03/2009 9:12:55 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; sushiman; mkmensinger; BuffaloJack; Jim Robinson

It appears that Mombasa was part of British Kenya for decades before it was formally ceded to newly independent Kenya in 1963. The British certainly administered it as part of the British East Africa Protectorate, later known as the Kenya Colony, for decades prior to 1963; in fact, Mombasa was the capital of the British East Africa Protectorate and the Kenya Colony. See http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/Mombasa,+Kenya (”Mombasa came under the control of the sultan of Zanzibar in 1840 and was leased to the British in 1895. From 1905 to 1907 it was the capital of the British East Africa Protectorate. In 1920 it became capital of the British Protectorate of Kenya. Mombasa officially belonged to Zanzibar from 1895 to 1963 when it was ceded to the newly independent Kenya.”)

So I have to believe that the birth certificate for someone born in Mombasa in 1961 would say that he was born in Kenya, not in Zanzibar.

Which is not to say that the Kenyan birth certificate isn’t a fake, just that it saying Mombasa, Kenya doesn’t make it a fake.


819 posted on 08/03/2009 9:13:43 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Ohhhh, that explains it. Outlaws...

I hear we have neighborhood snitchers! Look out!


820 posted on 08/03/2009 9:15:29 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800801-820821-840 ... 1,181-1,190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson