Posted on 07/30/2009 5:06:48 PM PDT by curiosity
Several readers have written over the past few days taking us to task for dismissing so-called birthers as lunatics without bothering to refute their claims. We reluctantly concede their point. The birthers have managed to sow confusion in the minds of some who are not lunatics, and for the latter groups benefit it is worth clarifying matters.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
“Nope. I think [Taranto’s essay] was found at that bastion of leftism: the Wall Street Journal.”
Would this be the same WSJ that has literally called for “open border” immigration for the last 25 years?
Would this be same WSJ that has literally called for “a path to citizenship” for America's 12 million illegal aliens?
Would this be the same WSJ that has NOT reported - repeat, NOT reported - that 70% of America's 40 million foreign born citizens vote for the Democratic Party?
Welcome to almost five months ago.
Someone should have a teachable moment about this issue with Obama over a beer.
Make mine a Guinness.
Blah, blah, blah...
Why is Hussein’s long form birth certificate and Ultra Top State Secret?
I got an Ummmm you are stupid type post as well.
This from the same guy who told me that Duncan Hunter's candidacy was picking up steam.
Blah, blah, blah...
Why is Hussein’s long form birth certificate an Ultra Top State Secret?
I am not a “birther,” but darn it, the bad guys are hiding something!
Stop fixating on the long form BC. Yes, we would wonder if it is faked. Why? Because this group has repeatedly demonstrated their willingness to destroy and fake documents. We are not dealing with forthright, honorable and trustworthy people here.
But the real smoke here is all of the history/records in total. And the serious effort to hide the history that is public knowledge with other Presidents and national politicians.
It’s not the BC in and of itself, it is the virtual blackout on all the other history of this guy and the lengths to which they are willing to go to hide [what is usually] mundane and boring biographical information.
Bill Clinton refused to release his medical history other than to have a doctor say he was healthy. We were all kooks for expecting him to release what every Republican candidate and President has been expected (by the left) to release.
They are the ones making a BFD out of records that no one else had had a problem making public. They are the ones foaming at the mouth. If BO had pulled out his original BC the same time as McCain did (after McCain’s was DEMANDED by the left) this would have died right then and there.
IMO, the man is entitled to no privacy. OK? He says he can tell me when and if I can see a doctor of his choosing. But I can’t see his school records? Bull.
Well, since it is true, your post is an oxy-moron of sorts.
Believing the truth, and wanting to believe the truth have excellent conjunction.
Ahh..., Roosevelt had his Fireside Chats... Obama has his Beer Summits... LOL...
Fireside Chats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fireside_chats
Beer Summits
[no Internet listing yet; too new... :-) ...]
We doubt that he would assault the truth with irrational and unsupported insults such as you are engaging in. Do you support all the deliberate deception using the false representations about the COLB that have been engaged in?
When all presidents before him have done so without embarrassment, you think its OK for Obama to remain the only president in history who hasn’t shown any real identification.
According to you, the American people don’t need to see Obama’s transcripts, his travel records, or his long form birth certificate. Information George Bush and Bill Clinton had to provide to the press is OK for Obama to conceal.
Is that what you believe?
“Pissing and whining about how a President, who wouldn’t take the time to spit on their shoes, isn’t catering to their desire to see more of his life’s history isn’t going to accomplish any of that. “
When it is a matter of national security, you are damn right the person who has the nuke codes’ history is important!
This just isn’t about curiosity, this is about a man who has NO PAPER TRAIL. We don’t know who he is. If a biographer wanted to write about him, he’d have to plagerize Obama’s books because there isn’t anything else out there!
Which conveniently happens to be the law of the land.
How about simply authorizing the Hawaii authorities to let the rest of us see the actual information as it is documented and examine that documentation so we could decide for ourselves. Why does such a possibility bother you?
I’ve got it...
Obama has new and novel ways of dealing with issues, ya know... like
“Beer Summits”... LOL..
Well, perhaps Obama could do something like ...
Certificate Trade...
[you mail your birth certificate to Obama, and he’ll mail his to you...]
Right before he kicked everyone’s arse in the Texas Straw Poll, if I recall.
Apparently it takes 6 months before you learn how to think.
Everyone around here says your a troll too, I guess I should believe them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.