Posted on 07/17/2009 5:48:28 AM PDT by kellynla
OK, I confess, the title is a bit misleading.
It should read Obama And His Lack Of A Birth Certificate Is About To Make History.
Yesterday, World Net Daily broke the story of Army Major Stefan Cook, who argued that he should not have to deploy to Afghanistan because President Obama has not proven that he is a natural-born citizen, therefore he is unable to serve as Commander-In-Chief.
This is something that will receive little, if any, coverage from the mainstream media.
However, the fact that the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a soldier about to be sent overseas based wholly upon such a claim is unprecedented.
This controversy over Obama’s failure to produce a valid birth certificate has been an ongoing saga.
And all calls for him to do so have either been belittled or ignored by the White House. Which may lead some folks to suspect that the reason he doesn’t simply produce the blasted thing and put this story to rest once and for all is because he doesn’t have one!
About the only attention we have seen regarding this issue was the presentation of a “Certificate Of Live Birth” supposedly issued by the State of Hawaii.
This proves less than nothing, as first, to look at it you would think that a 12-year old made it on their home computer, and secondly is the fact that a child does not have to be born in Hawaii in order for the state to issue such a document to the child’s parents.
Even if this document is legitimate, it is a far cry from an actual birth certificate, and it surely is not proof of where Obama was actually born.
However , there are literally thousands of articles and opinions floating around about Obama’s birth certificate, or lack therof, and I don’t want to bore you with re-visiting the same stories.
Rather, I would like to expound on my claim that Obama’s lack of a birth certificate will make history. Consider the following:
If indeed it is proven that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, and therefore is unable to serve as President, he will not be remembered as America’s first black President, rather history will remember him as the man who was the cause of the biggest Constitutional crisis this country has ever seen!
The question will be raised of what will happen to other troops deployed by Obama, and the troops already serving under orders from an ineligible commander in chief.
Every piece of legislation that Obama has signed since taking office would now be considered under law to be null and void.
Imagine what this would mean to the stock market, financial institutions, the auto industry, as well as every other facet of the American economy.
Not to mention, the people who already accuse the president’s critics of being racists will no doubt try to use this as their proof and stoke racial tensions to the point of riot.
Every appointment he has made, regardless if it was an appointment as a “Czar’, or a Cabinet-level position, would have to be overturned, and it would become the duty of the Vice-President to re-fill those positions.
Which leads to perhaps the most intriguing scenario of all.
The Constitution states that if the President is unable to serve, the Vice-President shall assume the duties of the office.
However, if the man who chose you to be his running mate was found to have been elected to the office in violation of Constitutional law, where does that leave you Mr. Biden?
After all, we (well, some of you poor misguided individuals) voted for the two of you as a team running on the same ticket.
So if it is found that the man who picked you to be his running mate did so in direct violation of federal law, doesn’t it follow that you were also elected to the Vice-Presidency under false pretenses?
Barack Obama. CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!
When the U.S. military accepts the claim of a soldier that the man posing as Commander-In-Chief has failed to produce his eligibility to hold that title, we may be on the verge of seeing change beyond belief.
Will the Wing Nut every give up on this? This has become more laughable than the African tapes awhile back..
MHGinTN,
Please read post #520.
Woodyman ( who joined today) is using a variation of the “Nut and Slut” argument. I've seen this argument used by a number of posters defending Obama. ( many who had joined that day or a few days earlier.)
In essence his question implies that the Constitution Defenders are so paranoid and “nutty” that no amount of evidence would satisfy them, so why should Obama bother.
“The stranger part is the fact that McCain had to prove to the Senate his place of birth...”
No, the stranger part is that you made such a ridiculous statement.
Oh Wow! These must be the DNC talking point strategies of the day!
Another “Nut and Slut” accusation, coupled with the question of Obama’s eligibility being too laughable to even consider.
We saw these DNC tactics with the sordid Lewinsky mess.
Keep it up Constitution Defenders! “Nut and Slut” and “Just Too Funny to Consider” defenses mean we are definitely making headway!
I am saying I think his mom had someone witness for her. I honestly do not know that for sure, its just a guess. I wish the bastard would just pony up the documents and get this hooey over with. The military deserves to know that the chain of command is completely intact, something that is not certain now.
“They keep referring to Obama as the first Black President.” With that in mind, BHO is twice the fraud, for he is not black, he is mulatto because his mother was Caucasian.
Go back to Obongo- and don’t forget your kneepads.
I don’t say that it would be settled if he provided to authentication a $12 piece of papaer. The lying affirmative action bastard should do as all past modern era presidents have done, show all the documentation of his past. Piss on the lying bastard. He committed perjury on his Illinois Bar application, he presented a false document via the Internet (it is not a document, BTW, just a jpg fabrication) claiming it proves his eligibility, her has spent hundreds of thousands on detectives and lawyers to seal every piece of data on his suspicious past ... no, I won’t be satisfied with just a long form birth certificate becasue if the lying prick used foreign citizenship to travel or obtain college funding and special treatment, he is not an America and he needs to be in prison, asap. That answer your idiot question/assertion, n00b?
Well, that doesn't surprise me. Again you are misconstruing what I'm saying but I read you for a lib disruptor anyway so I don't really care if you get it or not. I don't really care if you agree with me or not. And yeah, you can still go pee up a rope or pound sand or whatever. Basically, what I'm saying is go fornicate with yourself.
You didn’t read the rest of my comments below the first remark — The Senate passed a resolution saying McCain was eligible to run after he had taken a lot of heat on his birth since he was born outside the Country. They did not do the same with Obama.
I really realy like the toons! Superb, just superb.
Actually, to be precise, Leahy had inserted in the resolution that McCain was born on U.S territory in the Canal Zone. That was not true according to the BC McCain submitted showing he was born in a hospital in Colon, Panama.
They couldn’t even get that right but what did they all say about Obama and where he was born when questions came out — you could hear crickets chirping.
Those voices in your head are getting louder aren’t they.
I know what it is, you are really a plant by Huffington Post so they can say conservatives are crazy.
I did not either say or imply that you are paranoid, but your reading things I did not say into my posts might indicate that.
Nope. I am saying exactly what I said. I cast no aspersions on your position or your argument. Perhaps in the future you can refrain from ascribing views to me I have neither stated nor adopted.
Sounds to me like you just agreed with what I posted. Why the hostility?
1. No telling, esp. with even conservative radio commentators like Michael Medved talking it down as wacko stuff and not giving people a hearing on the grounds, as Medved put it, that no judge is going to touch this with a ten-foot pole. Well, Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin could have said the same and stayed home, after the Peter Zenger case showed how far the British were prepared to go to slap down colonial opinion.
2. WAG: Two years?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.