Posted on 07/17/2009 5:48:28 AM PDT by kellynla
OK, I confess, the title is a bit misleading.
It should read Obama And His Lack Of A Birth Certificate Is About To Make History.
Yesterday, World Net Daily broke the story of Army Major Stefan Cook, who argued that he should not have to deploy to Afghanistan because President Obama has not proven that he is a natural-born citizen, therefore he is unable to serve as Commander-In-Chief.
This is something that will receive little, if any, coverage from the mainstream media.
However, the fact that the U.S. Army revoked the orders of a soldier about to be sent overseas based wholly upon such a claim is unprecedented.
This controversy over Obama’s failure to produce a valid birth certificate has been an ongoing saga.
And all calls for him to do so have either been belittled or ignored by the White House. Which may lead some folks to suspect that the reason he doesn’t simply produce the blasted thing and put this story to rest once and for all is because he doesn’t have one!
About the only attention we have seen regarding this issue was the presentation of a “Certificate Of Live Birth” supposedly issued by the State of Hawaii.
This proves less than nothing, as first, to look at it you would think that a 12-year old made it on their home computer, and secondly is the fact that a child does not have to be born in Hawaii in order for the state to issue such a document to the child’s parents.
Even if this document is legitimate, it is a far cry from an actual birth certificate, and it surely is not proof of where Obama was actually born.
However , there are literally thousands of articles and opinions floating around about Obama’s birth certificate, or lack therof, and I don’t want to bore you with re-visiting the same stories.
Rather, I would like to expound on my claim that Obama’s lack of a birth certificate will make history. Consider the following:
If indeed it is proven that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, and therefore is unable to serve as President, he will not be remembered as America’s first black President, rather history will remember him as the man who was the cause of the biggest Constitutional crisis this country has ever seen!
The question will be raised of what will happen to other troops deployed by Obama, and the troops already serving under orders from an ineligible commander in chief.
Every piece of legislation that Obama has signed since taking office would now be considered under law to be null and void.
Imagine what this would mean to the stock market, financial institutions, the auto industry, as well as every other facet of the American economy.
Not to mention, the people who already accuse the president’s critics of being racists will no doubt try to use this as their proof and stoke racial tensions to the point of riot.
Every appointment he has made, regardless if it was an appointment as a “Czar’, or a Cabinet-level position, would have to be overturned, and it would become the duty of the Vice-President to re-fill those positions.
Which leads to perhaps the most intriguing scenario of all.
The Constitution states that if the President is unable to serve, the Vice-President shall assume the duties of the office.
However, if the man who chose you to be his running mate was found to have been elected to the office in violation of Constitutional law, where does that leave you Mr. Biden?
After all, we (well, some of you poor misguided individuals) voted for the two of you as a team running on the same ticket.
So if it is found that the man who picked you to be his running mate did so in direct violation of federal law, doesn’t it follow that you were also elected to the Vice-Presidency under false pretenses?
Barack Obama. CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN!
When the U.S. military accepts the claim of a soldier that the man posing as Commander-In-Chief has failed to produce his eligibility to hold that title, we may be on the verge of seeing change beyond belief.
Prove it. And while you are at it prove that what you are about to spout is what the framers of the Constitution meant.
Otherwise, check first and spout off second. This is honestly why this matter needs to come before the Supreme Court. Only one president has failed the born on American Soil to two American Parents test so far that wasn't specifically exempted in Article II, that was Chester Arthur, who hid the fact of his citizenship issues.
That's funny. You're the first take every Palin false flag put up by the left and roll in it like a dog on a fresh turd, but you turn around and act all worried about how this makes conservatives look bad?
I can deal with honest liberals. What I can't stomach is lying, two-faced weasels like yourself.
You're either naive or culpable; I believe it's the latter!
BEGONE! FOUL TROLL!
Well, at least its not negative. At this point seeing the Cash market go nuts is likely to be a bad thing in this economy.
I’m not sure that will be true. I think Biden will be President, and there will be discussions about when the next election for POTUS will be, 2010 or 2012.
There may have been some thinking that if they could keep the lid on this until the end of 2009, then even if this was proven, they could go until 2012 with Biden as President.
Every time the guy opens his mouth, it really is amazing how bad Biden is in terms of ability to form cogent thoughts and communicate them. Yesterday’s speech was a doozy among a lot of bad speeches.
If by some chance the SCOTUS or some other federal judge ruled that BHO was unable serve as POTUS because he is not a legitimate U.S. citizen, no one would be cheering louder than yours truly.
I am in my forties now. I have been active in conservative Republican politics since I was thirteen and worked on RR’s first presidential campaign in 1976. I also have an M.A. in Political Science and have a thorough understanding of the American political system and American history. I don’t claim to be smarter than anyone else but I have been in the trenches of political warfare for decades and fight the Left on a daily basis.
If a federal court does in fact throw BHO’s sorry ass out of the WH I will be shouting out with joy. But realistically I doubt that there is a federal judge in this country that has the cojones to call out BHO on the question of his birth certificate.
The only realistic way I know to stop BHO’s ruinous and irresponsible Marxist agenda is for conservatives to retake control of the Republican Party, and for the Party to retake the Congress in next year’s midterm elections. Of course it will not be easy. A lot of precincts will have to be walked, the phone banks manned, yard signs and bumperstickers displayed, checks will have to be written, and we will have to aggressively assert our opinions with our friends, families, neighbors, and co-workers. It is a lot of hard work and organizing but that’s what needs to be done to stop BHO dead in his tracks. We need to take back our Congress first and foremost. Yes it is a tall order, but nothing short of that will even make a modest dent against BHO’s aggressive and dramatic plan to socialize this America.
I speak the plain and simple truth. We did this before in 1994 and we could do it again. Where there is a will there is always a way.
Even if this is this the case, which I do not think it is, all the Cabinet is out of office immediately and has to go through re-confirmation by the Senate.
you may post a lot, but you haven’t proven/disprovened a thing
“I don’t care if you “talked” to the pope. No sane person would spend HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS fighting multiple lawsuits in multiple states when a simple $12.50 Birth Certificate would suffice.”
This is where the rubber meets the road! Put all the other BS aside, nobody would spend this kind of money to keep something secret for no reason. I don’t know what President Transparency is hiding, but he is hiding something. Some brave member of Congress, if one exists, needs to stand up on the floor of the Senate or the House and ask why all this money is being spent to keep this BC hidden! As usually happens, if you follow the money it will lead you to the truth.
Or obtuse and deceptive.
“...but he is hiding something.”
BINGO!
That is true but if he didn’t prove it, they would have clobbered him. It was not a requirement, but it should be for anyone running IMHO.
That wouldn’t be just.
If he is removed, it will be for TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, and the Constitution identifies a very appropriate punishment!
“State officials expressed surprise at the lawsuit, saying that Boston Medical received $1.5 billion in state funds in the past year and should not be seeking more in the midst of a fiscal crisis.” They will be a LOT more surprised when the Hospital closes it’s doors or declares bankruptcy. But maybe thats exactly what needs to happen to prove to people that this socialist system DOES NOT WORK.
“That being said, whats the market doing. Goldman in particular...”
Here ya go...http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=GS&time=ytd
On the other hand this isn't costing Obama a penny. His campaign picked up the tab, and now it's in the hands of the U.S. Attorny's office. He's not out dollar one, and to date every challenge has been successfully beaten. Why should he care how much it costs when he's batting a thousand?
Better put on your asbestos undies. When the Sarah Fan Club notices the implications of that statement, they'll flame you to a little charcoal briquette.
How do you figure?
...and the Constitution identifies a very appropriate punishment!
What might that be?
What a jackass. Palin is defending herself from spurious ethics allegations. Obama is avoiding persenting a simple document in court, a document that I've had to present often during my lifetime - to get a job, a driver's license, and a passport.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.