Posted on 05/12/2009 7:26:20 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Hadrosaur Soft Tissues Another Blow to Long-Ages Myth
by Brian Thomas, M.S.*
Recently-discovered dinosaur soft tissues, and even blood cells, represent some of the biggest hurdles for long-age evolutionary belief. Soft tissue was found in the femur of a large Tyrannosaurus rex about a decade ago, and more was discovered in another T. rex a few years later. And recently, soft tissues with proteins were found in a hadrosaur from Montana...
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
Most of us here have the knowledge, but you.
You are fake.
What positional calculation shows Earth as the center of Mars’ orbit?
>>You are fake.
Repeating yourself — early onset Alzheimer’s?
It is so funny to me that so many of you and your ilk think that by saying something over and over it makes it true -— now wait, who does that? Starts with an “l” and rhymes with “giberal.”
Seriously, you’re a liberal troll. You were from the first day and will be tomorrow providing you’re tolerated another day.
How does that work anyway, when you loons get yanked I mean?
Is there some initiation thingy and then you dream up another clever name no one will notice like a sore thumb?
How does that work when you can’t even do THAT right...after some 7 years on FR????? LOL!!
You are jumping to conclusions to defend your misperception.
You seem to be stuck on the older event, but even then, there was soft tissue that was not “mineralized.” And unfossilized eggs and bones of reptiles have been found several times.
It does. So I assume you will no longer use Gravity Probe B as evidence like you did dozens of times last year.
You still didn't answer as to what kind of Geocentrist you are: Tycho or Ptolemy.
If that’s the case, why did you have to inject yourself into the middle of it? Is it still personal?
Repeating yourself — early onset Alzheimer’s?
It is so funny to me that so many of you and your ilk think that by saying something over and over it makes it true -— now wait, who does that? Starts with an “l” and rhymes with “giberal.”
zeroite?
Exposing liberalism helps everyone.
>>Seriously, you’re a liberal troll. You were from the first day and will be tomorrow providing you’re tolerated another day.
There there, poor boy. The big mean man will leave you alone now, snookums. As I said, it is clear you classify everuone who understands more than you a “liberal” so I guess that word doesn’t have much meaning.
Thanks for the laughs, though. You really do crack me up.
If you’re not fake, why can’t you pass the exam, and move up to something functional? (instead if being a ‘sciency’ groupie on FR) Surely you must know how transparent you are?
>>Exposing liberalism helps everyone.
I need to keep coming to these threads to get my daily dose of iron-y
>>If you’re not fake, why can’t you pass the exam, and move up to something functional? (instead if being a ‘sciency’ groupie on FR) Surely you must know how transparent you are?
Seriously, you really don’t get to make that call. The fact I know more than you do about science doesn’t need something to prove it. My posting history makes that pretty clear.
I never said I was a scientist — I merely understand it.
I need go no further than your ilk’s repeated posts about “it is only a a theory” to make it clear that anyone who knows what a Scientific Theory is knows more than you folk.
She said that she demineralized a fossilized T rex bone, and there was certainly soft tissue AFTER she demineralized it.
You have not shown me a press release written by this scientist. Why not? Maybe you know less than you think about how science gets put into the popular press.
So why do we find bones of modern species, but only mineralized fossils of dinosaurs?
Excessive menstruation?
>>Excessive menstruation?
Off your game a bit there e/s...
Is that how you’re justifying it, as “exposing liberalism”?
Hey guys, I appreciate the laughs and all, but I think it is time to abandon this thread. We haven’t talked about tho OP in many posts and I admit I let you sort of suck me into this little-boy name calling you began.
I apologize to anyone reading this tread that I let myself be dragged down to this childish level, but I found it so arn funny I couldn’t stop myself.
It really has been a laugh hoot.
Blessings on you both.
Keep repeating the lies. But wrong on both counts. Bones of modern species are not found, neither are fossils, in all cases but volcanic eruptions. And soft tissue cannot magically reappear after pickling if it wasn't there before. You are really a piece of work.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/324/5927/626
Some bone fragments were subjected to chemical extraction (3, 10), and others were demineralized, showing marked preservation of microstructures resembling soft, transparent vessels, cells, and fibrous matrix in this pristine bone
So why do we find bones of modern species, but only fossilized bones of dinosaurs, if they lived contemporaneously?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.