Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Science-Based Sex Education
Christian Newswire ^ | 2/16/09 | Christian Newswire

Posted on 02/16/2009 3:37:34 PM PST by wagglebee

MEDIA ADVISORY, Feb. 16 /Christian Newswire/ -- During his speech to Planned Parenthood, Barack Obama made reference to teaching "science-based sex education" to "kindergartners" calling it "the right thing to do." Former Dept. of Justice researcher, Dr. Judith Reisman claims that the "science" behind Obama's sex education comes from 20th century pseudo-scientist, Alfred C. Kinsey, who trained pedophiles to molest children while using stopwatches to collect his so-called "scientific" data.

Reisman says: "This research created the entire sex education profession and is still in use today." Her testimony forms the backbone of a new documentary titled, "The Kinsey Syndrome," a film that MOVIEGUIDE calls "one of the most important productions of the 21st century," and that this film should be given to "every judge, every member of Congress, and all the officials in government."

Dr. Reisman claims that "our kids are being educated by information based on massive sex crimes against children, and the truth is still being covered up."

"The Kinsey Syndrome" documents this decades old cover-up, revealing the Congressional investigation into Kinsey during the 1950's. The effort was shut down by Congressman, Wayne Hays who later retired in disgrace over a sex scandal. Dr. Reisman experienced similar sabotage when she worked as a principle investigator for the Department of Justice, researching the child abuse imagery found in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler magazines. Liberal politics and far left media assaulted her as she attempted to expose the activities of big porno during the Reagan Administration.

Now that President Barack Obama has nominated David Ogden (a porn lawyer who has defended Playboy and Penthouse for years) to the second in command at the Department of Justice, Reisman believes the situation for America's women and children will go from bad to worse. Ogden led Obama's transition team for the Department of Justice. "These are team players," says Reisman. "Whether Ogden gets the appointment or not, the team he put in place will be based on his Playboy philosophy, which is founded on Kinsey."

Reisman's reference pertains to Hugh Hefner's assertion that he was "Kinsey's Pamphleteer" popularizing the Kinsey philosophy through Playboy Magazine. Hefner further maintains that he and Kinsey together launched the Sexual Revolution.

Dr. Judith Reisman is a scientific advisor for the California Protective Parents Association. More information on her and the shocking new documentary, "The Kinsey Syndrome" can be found at www.kinseysyndrome.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; agenda; bho44; bhoscience; culturewar; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; moralabsolutes; obamatruthfile; plannedparenthood; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: DaveLoneRanger; 2Jedismom; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; agrace; AlmaKing; Anima Mundi; Antoninus; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.
21 posted on 02/16/2009 5:46:03 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS; Fichori; tpanther; valkyry1; Mr. Silverback; Ethan Clive Osgoode; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; ...

Another abuse of science to wait and see if scientists object to.


22 posted on 02/16/2009 5:47:04 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

No surprise that obama is for this. Look at some of his picks for offices. The Assistant AG, IIRC.


23 posted on 02/16/2009 5:48:46 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AUH2O Repub; wagglebee; Old Sarge; darkwing104
This woman is a nutcase, don’t get trapped in her Victorian paranoia. How many of you buy or look at Playboy or Penthouse for it’s “pedophile imagery’? Let’s fight Bam-Bam’s abortion policies and support for planned parenthood, not get caught up with the prudes.

Prudes? Victorian paranoia?

Do you really think that child porn and the sexualization of children is to be swept under the rug?

Welcome to FR, noob. Looks like we got a live one, guys.

24 posted on 02/16/2009 5:53:24 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
The best sex education for high school age children is hygienic.

They're talking about 5 year olds here, not high schoolers.

The best sex ed a kid that age needs is to know that boys/girls have cooties. STAY AWAY!!!

25 posted on 02/16/2009 5:57:00 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I’m confused about several parts of this article, and I would love it if there were those on this thread that may be able to provide some links or something regarding the following claims made by the author:

1.) “Pedophile Imagery” in Playboy and Penthouse - How can pictures of naked women be construed as “pedophile imagery”? Now, if they were printing pictures of CHILD pornography (which is already illegal) I could understand, but I’ve never heard this assertion before - that Playboy and Penthouse, etc... promote pedophile ideas and imagery.

2.) The assertion that Kinsey did studies on children... I’m familiar with SOME of Kinsey’s studies and results, but have never run across anything having to do with children - admittedly I’ve never done an in-depth study on Kinsey!

With those requests stated, I would like to also state that I do NOT agree with Obama’s proposed plans for Sex Education in Kindergarten - beyond warning children about molestation and such (i.e. “Bad Touching”, etc...). I definitely see a BIG problem with Obama’s ties to Planned Parenthood, his support for abortion, etc... and how that translates to his belief in the need for MORE Sex Ed.

BTW: If anyone is interested, here is a link to the speech Obama gave at Planned Parenthood where he talked about Sex Ed in Kindergarten (following the clip is a section of a speech from Mitt Romney in which he addresses Obama thinking this was a “good idea”).

Barack Obama Shocks the World!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pO1dIKgfPw


26 posted on 02/16/2009 6:15:58 PM PST by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Did I say that child porn and sexualization of children should be swept under the rug? I said this woman is a nutcase. She tried to say Playboy and Penthouse are purveyors of child porn because they had cartoons, images or photos of children in their magazines 6,000 times between 1954-1994. None of these were actually child porn, and Reagan’s Justice Department refused to publish the results of her 700k study. Yeah, I stand behind Victorian paranoia with this woman. If Playboy and Penthouse are child porn then 90% of Freepers could have been locked up at one time or another for possession of child porn.


27 posted on 02/16/2009 6:26:12 PM PST by AUH2O Repub (Should have been Thompson/Hutchinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Actually, I can imagine a type of sex education for 5 year olds, but more along the lines of “impulse control training” for the boys, and “assertiveness training” for the girls.

A lot of gender training that used to be the norm, has long been under spiteful attack by those who didn’t see the inherent value of such training to male and female identities. And this has become even more valuable because of so many broken homes today.

Boys need an effective male role model, and girls an effective female role model to base their behavior on. And yes, this is sex ed, a lot more than fussing about sexuality, which is way over the heads of five year olds.

At the same time, five year old boys unpredictably but purposefully need maternal affection, as girls do paternal affection, and not just as contrast to their gender role model. The role model is “what I will grow up to be”, but the affection model is someone of the opposite gender who provides unconditional support.


28 posted on 02/16/2009 7:12:11 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A couple of places to find more info. Kinsey’s deviate behavior and “research”.

Biographer James Jones
Kinsey’s biographer and fan James Jones, in his 1997 book, Alfred C. Kinsey: a public/private life, wrote that Kinsey was a bisexual who preferred homosexual sex . and developed a taste for masochistic practices of a really cringe-inducing kind. He also had some pronounced voyeuristic and exhibitionistic tendencies” (Kupelian, p.1l). Despite these damning revelations, Jones still thought of Kinsey as a tragic hero who spent his life pleading for sexual tolerance.

And

World Net Daily (WND)
2,400 lawmakers warn of Kinsey influence
Scholarly work shows sexual revolutionary’s far-reaching damage

Posted: July 06, 2004


29 posted on 02/16/2009 7:16:24 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

The first was found at catholicinsight.com/online/reviews/films/kinseysx.shtml -

I chopped it off while copying.


30 posted on 02/16/2009 7:20:38 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Sadly, I don’t see that kind of sex education occurring in public schools. The public schools track record in dealing with sex and kids isn’t so reasonable.

I wouldn’t want to see what the NEA can come up with for teaching kids in grade school about sex.


31 posted on 02/16/2009 7:52:49 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AUH2O Repub
Let’s fight Bam-Bam’s abortion policies and support for planned parenthood, not get caught up with the prudes.

The article is about sex ed in public schools and what it's based on, not about Penthouse and Playboy. Try to stay on topic.

It is not prudish or paranoia to protect children against the kind of sexualization that a public education sex ed program will result in.

Downplaying the sexualization of children by attempting to focus everyone's attention on other issues, isn't going to fly here, either.

Blowing it off by stating that we *not get caught up with the prudes*, says that you don't object to that.

32 posted on 02/16/2009 8:01:09 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Thanks for the ping!


33 posted on 02/16/2009 8:26:14 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Bump!


34 posted on 02/17/2009 5:15:49 AM PST by Between the Lines (Liberals wanting a massive bailout leaves Conservatives wanting to bail out en masse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AUH2O Repub; metmom; Alamo-Girl

Repub wrote, “I said this woman is a nutcase. She tried to say Playboy and Penthouse are purveyors of child porn because they had cartoons, images or photos of children in their magazines 6,000 times between 1954-1994. None of these were actually child porn, and Reagan’s Justice Department refused to publish the results of her 700k study. Yeah, I stand behind Victorian paranoia with this woman. If Playboy and Penthouse are child porn then 90% of Freepers could have been locked up at one time or another for possession of child porn.”

Spirited: That you disagree with Reismans’ claim is beside the point. Pornography is a downward spiraling process that if not stopped, will completely engulf, dehumanize, and eroticize an entire society. It starts with the objectification of the female body-—all users of porn are ‘users’ of someone elses’ body parts, btw-—moves ever downward to older youth, then to children, to babies, to animals, and even to objects. America looks increasingly like Carthage when Augustine arrived there. In his memorable words, in Carthage can be heard the ‘sizzling and frying of unholy loves’——anything went.

All defenders of Playboy, Hustler, etc., are in fact defending an ‘unholy right’ to use for their own personal gratification the objectified body parts of someone else.

Before man can do harm to another of his kind, he must first dehumanize (objectify) the other. In order that they could slaughter millions of people, the Soviets literally conditioned soldiers to view others as weeds, animals, pond scum, etc., as verified by the authors of The Black Book of Communism. Sex predators put themselves through the same unholy process. So do abortionists, and so do users of pornography.


35 posted on 02/17/2009 5:20:43 AM PST by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I agree with you that any public school efforts along these lines will be very perverse.

An alternative would be for a respectable and responsible organization to produce high quality instructional blocks that are age appropriate, on DVD, with distribution for family viewing.

Many of us remember the value of the Disney educational movies when we were growing up. How they could deliver large amounts of information in an enjoyable manner, and markedly better than classroom instruction.

By delivering such DVDs to families, directly, perhaps Netflix-style, a huge amount of accurate and timely information could be given, stripped of any indoctrination or political correctness. As such, it would neutralize a lot of the current efforts at propagandizing children, because such villains just couldn’t overcome the clarity of a multimedia presentation.

Importantly, the DVDs need to be oriented to correct parental ignorance as well. A lot of parents are just as ignorant or misinformed as their children about sexuality, and need to learn these things as well.


36 posted on 02/17/2009 7:15:47 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish; AUH2O Repub; metmom; betty boop
Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear spirited irish!

Before man can do harm to another of his kind, he must first dehumanize (objectify) the other. In order that they could slaughter millions of people, the Soviets literally conditioned soldiers to view others as weeds, animals, pond scum, etc., as verified by the authors of The Black Book of Communism. Sex predators put themselves through the same unholy process. So do abortionists, and so do users of pornography.

Indeed. What doctor could perform an abortion if he sees the "fetus" as an actual baby? Who could put millions of people to death if he sees them as he sees himself?

Pornography does indeed objectify whoever or whatever is the subject of it. And for what purpose? A picture of a fire does not keep one warm.

Also, I doubt that 90% of Freepers subscribe to Penthouse or Playboy. For one thing, most Freepers are Christian and I suspect many or most of them are aware that thinking a thing is as bad for a Christian as actually doing it. (Matthew 5)

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. - Matthew 5:27-28

So my guess would be that many Freepers would avoid pornography though certainly they would be exposed to a lot of it anyway.

37 posted on 02/17/2009 7:17:03 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

I just love the way people love to put words into your mouth. I did NOT say 90% of Freepers subscribe to Playboy or Penthouse, my guess is that it is more like 5%. However, I would bet that 90% have looked at Playboy or Penthouse at one point or another. If these magazines are considered child pornography then they would have been in possession of child pornography. We all know (at least I hope so) that these magazines are not by any definition, child pornography, but this so-called “researcher” tried to say they were. She thus destroys all confidence in other research or positions she writes on.


38 posted on 02/17/2009 3:27:57 PM PST by AUH2O Repub (Should have been Thompson/Hutchinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AUH2O Repub
Thank you for the clarification.

Since I do not read either, I'm in no position to say whether or not they contain child pornography.

39 posted on 02/17/2009 8:52:05 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson