Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AUH2O Repub; metmom; Alamo-Girl

Repub wrote, “I said this woman is a nutcase. She tried to say Playboy and Penthouse are purveyors of child porn because they had cartoons, images or photos of children in their magazines 6,000 times between 1954-1994. None of these were actually child porn, and Reagan’s Justice Department refused to publish the results of her 700k study. Yeah, I stand behind Victorian paranoia with this woman. If Playboy and Penthouse are child porn then 90% of Freepers could have been locked up at one time or another for possession of child porn.”

Spirited: That you disagree with Reismans’ claim is beside the point. Pornography is a downward spiraling process that if not stopped, will completely engulf, dehumanize, and eroticize an entire society. It starts with the objectification of the female body-—all users of porn are ‘users’ of someone elses’ body parts, btw-—moves ever downward to older youth, then to children, to babies, to animals, and even to objects. America looks increasingly like Carthage when Augustine arrived there. In his memorable words, in Carthage can be heard the ‘sizzling and frying of unholy loves’——anything went.

All defenders of Playboy, Hustler, etc., are in fact defending an ‘unholy right’ to use for their own personal gratification the objectified body parts of someone else.

Before man can do harm to another of his kind, he must first dehumanize (objectify) the other. In order that they could slaughter millions of people, the Soviets literally conditioned soldiers to view others as weeds, animals, pond scum, etc., as verified by the authors of The Black Book of Communism. Sex predators put themselves through the same unholy process. So do abortionists, and so do users of pornography.


35 posted on 02/17/2009 5:20:43 AM PST by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: spirited irish; AUH2O Repub; metmom; betty boop
Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear spirited irish!

Before man can do harm to another of his kind, he must first dehumanize (objectify) the other. In order that they could slaughter millions of people, the Soviets literally conditioned soldiers to view others as weeds, animals, pond scum, etc., as verified by the authors of The Black Book of Communism. Sex predators put themselves through the same unholy process. So do abortionists, and so do users of pornography.

Indeed. What doctor could perform an abortion if he sees the "fetus" as an actual baby? Who could put millions of people to death if he sees them as he sees himself?

Pornography does indeed objectify whoever or whatever is the subject of it. And for what purpose? A picture of a fire does not keep one warm.

Also, I doubt that 90% of Freepers subscribe to Penthouse or Playboy. For one thing, most Freepers are Christian and I suspect many or most of them are aware that thinking a thing is as bad for a Christian as actually doing it. (Matthew 5)

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. - Matthew 5:27-28

So my guess would be that many Freepers would avoid pornography though certainly they would be exposed to a lot of it anyway.

37 posted on 02/17/2009 7:17:03 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson