Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert calls for total junk food ban to stop obesity 'catastrophe'
thisislondon.co.uk ^ | 01/27/09 | Sophie Goodchild, Health Editor

Posted on 01/27/2009 4:07:15 AM PST by TornadoAlley3

Junk food advertisements which target children should be completely banned, an obesity expert has warned.

Professor Philip James says that drastic action is needed against food firms which he says exploit consumers in the same way as tobacco companies.

The nutritionist from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine told a conference in London: "We have a catastrophic obesity epidemic and the food industry has had a vast impact on society. The food industry is represented by companies like PepsiCo, Coca-Cola and Cadbury which are damaging the health of people across the world.

"We want to reform [the food industry's] behaviour and the way they respond is by mirroring tobacco [companies]. They're focused on the Third World for the next raft of profits."

Professor James, chairman of the International Obesity TaskForce, also attacked the Government for inviting fast food companies to join healthy living campaigns. Ministers have introduced curbs on TV advertising of foods to children, especially products high in salt, sugar and fat and new rules ban junk food advertisements on television before 9pm.

But Professor James wants a complete ban on unhealthy foods on TV and the internet as well as a ban on the use of "child-friendly" logos on supermarket food.

A spokesman for Cadbury said: "We only market to adults."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: advertising; ban; foodpolice; junkfood; nannystate; obesity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: TornadoAlley3

Why ban junk food? My kids enjoy junkfood and they are both thin and healthy. So my kids have to suffer because other kids are fat?


21 posted on 01/27/2009 5:40:51 AM PST by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Sexy Conservative!!! I am no LEMMING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
Another flavor of fascism. We will tell you how to think and behave because we know better.
For the common good of course.
22 posted on 01/27/2009 5:42:18 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I can't wait for January 20, 2013")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Simple solution: EAT RESPONSIBLY sign in all fast food places. s/


23 posted on 01/27/2009 5:50:03 AM PST by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman

Simple solution: EAT RESPONSIBLY sign in all fast food places. s/”


Ding, ding, ding,

we have a winner. Or should I say ding-dong, ding-dong, ding, dong.


24 posted on 01/27/2009 6:02:26 AM PST by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a guideline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
What, exposing kids to smokers’ smoke keeps asthma down?

Of course not, it's just an observation that could lead to some correlation, or not. There are many environmental variables that alone or in combinations might lead to something but I doubt any grant money is available for such a non-pc study.

During my childhood every kid I knew was exposed to second hand smoke on a daily basis because you could smoke everywhere, including the Doctors office then. I didn't know one kid with asthma and very few with allergies. There also were very few obese kids but that's probably partially due to the more sedentary habits of our society.

25 posted on 01/27/2009 6:26:03 AM PST by MissCalico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MissCalico

Hey, they’ve concluded now that too clean an environment can lead to allergies and suppress kids’ immune systems, so who’s to say doctors won’t be purposefully blowing smoke in kids faces in a few years!?!


26 posted on 01/27/2009 6:30:43 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

There is a growing trend towards using stand up desks or workstations. I use one and I feel much better as a result. It doesn’t sound like much but just standing and walking around a bit (instead of sliding my chair back and forth) has made a big difference for me.


27 posted on 01/27/2009 6:31:50 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
... so who’s to say doctors won’t be purposefully blowing smoke in kids faces in a few years!?!

LOL to that visual.

28 posted on 01/27/2009 6:54:31 AM PST by MissCalico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
That's is related to what I've heard referred to as the "starvation reaction" correct?

I think that's probably a reference to a slowdown in resting metabolic rate in response to starvation as a way to conserve resources. You have to be REALLY starved for this to occur.
29 posted on 01/27/2009 7:47:54 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The vast majority of people I know do NOT eat out. One of the noticeable changes of our society is "cubicle" living. No walks to the water cooler, to the office down the hall etc, etc.

The problem is a relationship between food intake and energy expenditure. Even if you don't eat out, it's very, very easy to take in more kcals than you expend in a day because we require so little physical activity in the course of a day. A hundred years ago people were eating hundreds of calories more per day without being fat because they had so much more physical activity. By the time someone gets to be 40, he's probably put on 20 or 30 pounds more than he weighed in his twenties. This happens at the insensible rate of about 10 kcals/day (to compare, 1 small cake donut is about 150 kcals): 20 years X 365.25 days/year X 10kcals/day divided by 3500kcals/pound fat = 20.89 lbs of fat over 20 years.
30 posted on 01/27/2009 7:57:41 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
You have to be REALLY starved for this to occur.

Yes. I was a wrestler in high school and college. Strict dieting to get to the next lower weight class was very common. Some of my teammates were literally starving themselves, yet weren't seeing weight loss beyond a certain point, despite daily strenuous exercise. We began to think this was due to a starvation reaction, but there was really no way to know. Ever since those days, and since my siblings are both morbidly obese, I've been interested in diet and nutrition. Now, it's to the point where I grow most of my own food. I could easily be heavy like my brother and sister were it not for my own strict dietary habits in regard to empty sugar calories and daily exercise activity. Thanks for the info!

31 posted on 01/27/2009 8:05:23 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I weigh the same as I did when I was 17. At 65 and knowing that I don't use as much energy, I count calories and no longer eat a sundae on a daily basis.

My dad maintained the same weight for 50 years. Trick...If he gained 5 lbs, he decreased his calorie intake until he got back to his norm.

People have to learn to count actual calories. The fat content, salt and sugar are all related.

32 posted on 01/27/2009 8:12:20 AM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I weigh the same as I did when I was 17. At 65 and knowing that I don't use as much energy, I count calories and no longer eat a sundae on a daily basis.

My dad maintained the same weight for 50 years. Trick...If he gained 5 lbs, he decreased his calorie intake until he got back to his norm.

People have to learn to count actual calories. The fat content, salt and sugar are all related.


My mom has stayed trim into her mid-80s. She's told me she knew she couldn't eat past a certain amount and not grow fat and she stayed behind that point.
33 posted on 01/27/2009 8:53:37 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

As a smoker whose been discriminated against and maligned for most of my life, I cannot help but take a certain sad pleasure in saying the following:

“TAKE THAT, Lardsters!!!”

What goes around comes around...


34 posted on 01/27/2009 8:59:34 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

As a smoker whose been discriminated against and maligned for most of my life, I cannot help but take a certain sad pleasure in saying the following:

“TAKE THAT, Lardsters!!!”

What goes around comes around...”

________

Especially to my 350 pound better-than-thou in law!


35 posted on 01/27/2009 9:02:57 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson