Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware Birth Certificate Hopefuls - You are in for quite a suprise (vanity)

Posted on 12/03/2008 8:14:35 AM PST by Scythian

This birth certificate issue has been going on for some time now and for those hoping for some kind of dramatic outcome you are in for another big disappointment.

First, there is always the chance that there is a valid birth certificate proving Obama to be a US citizen.

Second, enough time has passed such that the Obama cult has manufactured and installed a phony certificate that will re-route us back up to option 1 above, he will have a valid certificate. Who do you think works in these kinds of government offices? They're all democrats.

Third, no court is going to force Obama to prove himself to be a citizen, the burden is on those making the accusation that he is not a citizen. A criminal doesn't have to prove he didn't commit a crime, the state has to prove that he did.

=================================

Flame on, and sorry for the Vanity, but this is driving me nutz, this issue gets my hopes up but then common sense dashes my hope on the rocks, and this now is a daily occurrence. You are going to find a valid certificate at the end of this road if you are lucky enough to get a judge to demand it, and that is very unlikely, whether the certificate be real or phony it won't matter, and will never be able to proven either way.


TOPICS: US: Hawaii; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; whathospital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-447 next last
To: LibLieSlayer

If Jim does not purge some of the long time dim operatives... this place will become as useless as town hall.

LLS

_____________________________

Hahaha...well said, sir!


241 posted on 12/03/2008 11:00:18 AM PST by IrishPennant (He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: oldfart

I had thought of that scenario as well. However, the Senate Resolution 511 that declared McCain to be Natural Born as a “sense of the senate” is very telling. Obama introduced language that would EXPAND the definition which JUST SO HAPPENS to include his case. That means he knew about the trouble well before gramma was dying. He knew before he ran. In his mind, there would only be a problem if he won, and he would leverage the result as much as possible (including the threat of race riots) to shoehorn the Supreme Court into deciding for him.


242 posted on 12/03/2008 11:00:21 AM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

In scenario in post #2, all Congress would need to do would be pass a law clarifying citizenship definitions, heck, they could even go back to the 1790 standard. No Constitutional amendment would be required.
***So that would mean this whole thing was NOT what zer0bama called it: garbage. All the more reason to push forward.


243 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:16 AM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

what is he has spent a million bucks to make us look like MOONBATS?

which if SCOTUS punts and makes him eligible will make all of us look like one.


244 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:25 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Helen

i hope when SCOTUS punts and/or says BHO is NBC, you wont shout they are in the tank?

i aint falling for this drama again. like i did with the Korir API tapes. not anymore.


245 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:26 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: oldfart

the moment to stop BHO was before elections.

once he won, it was a different ball game.

especially since the RATS won big in congress.


246 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:26 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

the moment to ask for proof was before election.

we already hired him for the job.

there is no exit clause except: death, resignation or impeachment.


247 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:26 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

It is not just his birth place. Per Article II of the constitution you are a “natural born citizen” if both of your parents (father and mother) are natural born citizens or US citizens or naturalized citizens and you yourself are born in the US or US territories. Barack Obama senior (if that is the father) was not a US Citizen- he was in the US on student visa. Stanly Anne Dunham could have given birth to baby Obama or baby Barry right in the Oval office at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and still Mr. Obama will not be eligible to be President per Article II, period.
Let’s hope that our Supreme Court will look at legality of this issue and not the practically of it and side with the constitution. And let’s hope that the law of the land, the US Constitution, that has survived several wars in our history, depression, terrorist attack, natural disasters, civil unrest, etc will survive the fraud by one man.


248 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:27 AM PST by ColdDecember (It is not just the BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

It is because of rhis “document” that you call toilet paper that you utter/write such words.


249 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:27 AM PST by ColdDecember (It is not just the BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual

US law allows us to deal with Dictators and Illegitamete office holders all over the world.

US President does not make laws. thats congress.

President just signs to give it effect.

you may need to re-read your legal books.


250 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:27 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

i understand your frustration. i have been too.

but im not going to make the same mistake i did with API.

i aint falling for “un verified stuff”. not anymore.

got fooled once. not getting fooled or punked a second time.

im basing my hopes (only hopes) on SCOTUS definition of NBC

if SCOTUS punts or confirms BHO is NBC, then its all over.

thats just the reality. no need to get hypher ventilated.


251 posted on 12/03/2008 11:04:27 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Well that is a consideration, no doubt. I don’t believe anything would spark more outrage by U.S. Citizens than a bald faced attempt to destroy our original constitution. If the left tried this, I think they would find out real quick who holds the power in this nation.


252 posted on 12/03/2008 11:06:24 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Okay lefties... the problem with wanting something, is that you sometimes get it. Good luck now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Third, no court is going to force Obama to prove himself to be a citizen, the burden is on those making the accusation that he is not a citizen. A criminal doesn't have to prove he didn't commit a crime, the state has to prove that he did.

If he indeed has documentary evidence that his fills the requirements of the Constitution, fine and dandy with me -- I will not feel any negative for insisting that he demonstrate he complies. I take issue with your opinion here, however, in that if he DOES NOT fill the requirements, yet is allowed to hold the office, ignore a portion of the Constitution at his whim even when challenged, then it sets the precedent that ANY citizen may ignore ANY portion of the Constitution at HIS whim. No court, local, state, federal, Supreme, can allow this precedent to be set, IMHO.

253 posted on 12/03/2008 11:07:06 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Come on people. In under 5 mins. I found the real one on Google.

Can't we just MoveOn.org?

254 posted on 12/03/2008 11:07:06 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdDecember
Per Article II of the constitution you are a “natural born citizen” if both of your parents (father and mother) are natural born citizens or US citizens or naturalized citizens and you yourself are born in the US or US territories.

Posts like this is where a lot of these problems are coming from. Everything I struck through above is not in the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't define what a 'natural born citizen' is, in Article 1 it authorizes congress to define citizenship and naturalization laws. See post 204, those are the current laws that define if one is a natural born citizen.

255 posted on 12/03/2008 11:07:09 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Thank you so much for that link! Ted Hayes makes the case in such an articulate manner and with such clarity! Wow, I'm saving that one fer shur.

I have been writing for weeks that it is a shame this man was the first balckman elected tot he office because he is such a fraud. But Ted makes the case so much better than I have! And with facts I was aware of, such as the East African Muslim slaving connection to the Luo tribe.

256 posted on 12/03/2008 11:08:24 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: texas12joe

No we have not hired him yet. We voted for electors, not the candidates. He IS NOT President Elect yet. The EC will not meet until 12/15/08. If you are going to troll, at least try to be a knowledgeable troll.


257 posted on 12/03/2008 11:08:47 AM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Don’t fall prey to the dissonance from obamanoids tryign to ridicule. Donofrio’s case is that the NJ election officials did not verify Obama’s eligibility before allowing him on the ballot. Period.


258 posted on 12/03/2008 11:12:17 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Congress cannot void the Constitution without specific steps. But that was yet another nice try to get your obamanoid kneepads into the game, dumb, but you keep trying.

Congress cannot void the Constitution period. They cannot void it. They cannot amend it alone. They cannot ignore it. Talk about dumb.

259 posted on 12/03/2008 11:12:45 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Actually, it’s based on my understanding of the premise of the natural born definition as defined in Donofrio’s brief.


260 posted on 12/03/2008 11:13:40 AM PST by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson