Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA TELLS SAN FRANCISCO HE WILL INTENTIONALLY BANKRUPT THE COAL INDUSTRY!!!
YOUTUBE ^

Posted on 11/02/2008 2:51:06 AM PST by Pacothecat

Audio Unearthed

ATTN: Coal states Virginia , Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Indiana and more guess what Obama told San Francisco about you.

San Francisco Gate Interview January 17 2008


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Indiana; US: Iowa; US: Kentucky; US: Minnesota; US: Missouri; US: Nevada; US: New Hampshire; US: New Mexico; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania; US: Virginia; US: West Virginia; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2008; 200801; 20080117; antichrist; bankruptcoalindustry; bo; cleancoal; coal; coalenergy; democrat; democrats; digg; economy; election; electionpresident; elections; energy; mccain; mining; obama; obamacoal; obamamessiah; obamathedestroyer; obamatruthfile; pa; palin; selfping; swingstates; virginia; wva; youtube
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 481-490 next last
To: jeepers creepers

Corrected list. There was an error in email address formation on one of the addresses.

rickdavis@johnmccain.com,
ameese@mccain08hq.com,
anickel@mccain08hq.com,
johnmccain@gop.com,
info@gop.com,
RNCommunications@gop.com,
Chairman@gop.com,
Political@gop.com,
ElRushbo@eibnet.com,
me@glennbeck.com,
Hannity@foxnews.com,
Friends@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Jamie@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Viewerservices@foxnews.com,
FNS@foxnews.com,
Newswatch@foxnews.com,
Foxreport@foxnews.com,
phil.griffin@nbc.com,
steve.capus@nbc.com,
Steve.Capus@nbcuni.com,
gary.sheffer@ge.com,
renata.hopkins@ge.com,
lisa.lanspery@ge.com,
brian.williams@msnbc.com,
chris.matthews@msnbc.com,
countdown@msnbc.com,
hardball@msnbc.com,
Today@NBC.com,
viewerservices@msnbc.com,
nightly@nbc.com,
World@MSNBC.com,
Dateline@NBC.com,
world@msnbc.com,
atc@npr.org,
morning@npr.org,
Letters@msnbc.com,
totn@npr.org,
newshour@pbs.org,
joe@msnbc.com,
abrams@msnbc.com,
byork@nationalreview.com,
comments@mclaughlin.com,
ElRushbo@eibnet.com,
evening@cbsnews.com,
Foxreport@foxnews.com,
gretawire@fox.com,
Hannity@foxnews.com,
hemmer@foxnews.com,
hume@foxnews.com,
ElRushbo@eibnet.com,
me@glennbeck.com,
oreilly@foxnews.com,
Joe@msnbc.com,
letters@charleskrauthammer.com,
lindamuller@buchanan.org,
me@glennbeck.com,
netaudr@abc.com,
Ontherecord@foxnews.com,
oreilly@foxnews.com,
race08@msnbc.com,
Special@foxnews.com,
stu@glennbeck.com,
ureport@foxnews.com,
weekendlive@foxnews.com,
LouDobbs@cnn.com,
jake.tapper@abc.com,
360@cnn.com,
a.latour@wsj.com,
a.murray@wsj.com,
am@cnn.com,
amhotshots@cnn.com,
caffertyfile@cnn.com,
campbellbrown@cnn.com,
cnn.feedback@cnn.com,
cnn.onair@cnn.com,
cnn@cnn.com,
crossfire@cnn.com,
darren.mcdermott@wsj.com,
daybreak@cnn.com,
elrushbo@eibnet.com,
foxreport@foxnews.com,
hannity@foxnews.com,
headlinenews@cnn.com,
insidepoliticts@cnn.com,
inthemoney@cnn.com,
j.fry@wsj.com,
jeff.greenfield@cnn.com,
je@msnbc.com,
dlow@cnbc.com,
late.edition@cnn.com,
letters@msnbc.com,
live@cnn.com,
livefrom@cnn.com,
livetoday@cnn.com,
lookingout@cnn.com,
loudobbs@cnn.com,
moneyline@cnn.com,
newsnight@cnn.com,
newstips@cnn.com,
paulazahn@cnn.com,
podcast@cnn.com,
primenews@cnn.com,
question@cnn.com,
special@foxnews.com,
t.cullen@wsj.com,
tina.cowles@cnn.com,
tom.hannon@cnn.com,
wam@cnn.com,
wolf@cnn.com,
wsj.ltrs@wsj.com


161 posted on 11/02/2008 6:02:09 AM PST by FTL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: beagleone

Rush

ElRushbo@eibnet.com


162 posted on 11/02/2008 6:02:10 AM PST by Marie (Charlie Gibson is a condescending tool...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

He doesn’t like coal. According to the pie chart, coal currently provides half of our current energy needs. By his anti-carbon logic, he shouldn’t like gas either. He just isn’t singling them out today.

He doesn’t mention investing in nuclear, even though we get a lot, and could get a lot more, energy from nuclear. He wants to invest huge government revenues into wind, solar and other renewables, 2.4% of the pie. Maybe we could double the amount of energy we receive from these sources.

If he has his way, we will have far less energy, and what we have will cost much more. Look forward to heating your home with firewood in winter, even if the great one makes doing so illegal. The cost of US manufacturing depends in part on the cost of energy. As energy costs go sky high, more US jobs will be lost.


163 posted on 11/02/2008 6:03:41 AM PST by ChessExpert (If it had been up to Hussein Obama, Saddam Hussein would still be in power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

I did rush and hannity........does anyone know how to save that tape on youtube?


164 posted on 11/02/2008 6:05:00 AM PST by Hanna548 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: igoramus08
That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, bio-diesel and other alternative energy approaches.

... billions of dollars that we can redistribute.

165 posted on 11/02/2008 6:06:03 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg

web portal for SF Chron


166 posted on 11/02/2008 6:07:27 AM PST by TeleStraightShooter (When BH0 was 8 he attended his mosque in jakarta; Bill Ayers was simultaneously bombing the Pentagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: meyer
People in areas with a lot of miners or other interest in coal will never hear this. Obama's presstitutes will make certain of that.

The loss of a free press in this country allows The One to act like a 19th century politician on a literal whistle stop tour. At one stop, in the city, he can promise high tariffs to protect manufactures. At the next, in the country, he can promise to lower tarifs so farmers can buy cheap imported goods.

No need to tell the truth. Thats the way things use to be done in this country the last time there was no responsible national press in the land.

167 posted on 11/02/2008 6:07:43 AM PST by Mad_as_heck (The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vwatto

“Does it get play in the MSM?”

No way. The msm is Obama`s Praetorian Guard.


168 posted on 11/02/2008 6:07:47 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

Drudged!


169 posted on 11/02/2008 6:09:43 AM PST by JPII Be Not Afraid (McCain/Palin 08 - Evil triumps when good people do nothing!! www.protestthemedia.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hanna548

quinn@warroom.com


170 posted on 11/02/2008 6:11:56 AM PST by Marie (Charlie Gibson is a condescending tool...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Proud 2BeTexan

I just did save it.


171 posted on 11/02/2008 6:12:10 AM PST by FTL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Even that part of the argument makes no logical sense. He says that the “huge sums” in greenhouse gas penalties that companies will have to pay will generate all of these dollars — but also admits that the companies will be forced into bankruptcy by these huge penalties, thereby negating the whole plan. HELLO!!


172 posted on 11/02/2008 6:14:24 AM PST by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

aaaaarugh! The “views” is locked on this thing! FReepers are crawling all over it and it hasn’t gone up from 1,101 views in the last 15 minutes.


173 posted on 11/02/2008 6:14:45 AM PST by Marie (Charlie Gibson is a condescending tool...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat
Coal states Virginia , Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Indiana and more

Add Illinois and Missouri to that list. Illinois is lost, I know, but the Big MO isn't. And aside from that Arch Coal and Peabody who control most of the coal are headquartered here. And it's not like it's 1939 and the Illinois soft coal dust is completely blocking sunlight (yes, that did actually happen here).

174 posted on 11/02/2008 6:15:08 AM PST by Desdemona (Lipstick only until the election. The gloss has been sacrificed for the greater good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: igoramus08
Obama is pro nuclear, he just doesnt say it. Bill Ayers’ father was chairman of Edison, which has nuclear energy plants and waste storage businesses. Edison contributes to Obama. Surprise Surprise, Axelrod has Edison as one of his corporate clients. Obama even watered down nuclear energy legislation after some leak incidents, until reporting of future leaks was only voluntary.

Obama can only portray himself as being pro-nuclear so long as his enviroweenie supporters are quiet about it. Of course, they probably expect us to use mostly wind and solar. Once they are forced to admit that it will take a lot of nuclear plants to replace fossil fuels, all bets are off.

175 posted on 11/02/2008 6:18:14 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hanna548

this firefox plugin: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3006

If you are not using Firefox for an IB, its simple to use and some say more secure.

Download the pluging and it installs to Firefox and then there is an icon on your FF browser just go to the video, then click on that icon and it downloads it for you in the normal way save to etc. Easy to use.


176 posted on 11/02/2008 6:19:40 AM PST by FTL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona

Coal is a big industry in western ND, eastern WY and MT...
Wonder is this would change the votes there...
When I was in ND there were massive(100+cars)coal trains...


177 posted on 11/02/2008 6:20:30 AM PST by ReeWalker (Darlin', you can put your boots in the oven seven days a week, but it don't mean they're biscuits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: RepublitarianRoger2
Even that part of the argument makes no logical sense. He says that the “huge sums” in greenhouse gas penalties that companies will have to pay will generate all of these dollars — but also admits that the companies will be forced into bankruptcy by these huge penalties, thereby negating the whole plan. HELLO!!

Good analysis.

178 posted on 11/02/2008 6:22:31 AM PST by FTL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Slam FOX News! lol!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77538,00.html


179 posted on 11/02/2008 6:23:20 AM PST by Marie (Charlie Gibson is a condescending tool...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
"Or a socialist/communist. Some of his supporters know exactly what they're voting for. And that's exactly what they want."

I agree. And what they want is a complete suppression of individual rights so they can institute Marxism in America. If thousands die as a result of a conflict over our constitutional rights they are OK with that. If millions more die as a result of the extreme worldwide poverty that exrtreme enviromentalism will produce they are OK with that too.

Aquiring power is all that ever mattered in the communist philosophy.

180 posted on 11/02/2008 6:24:06 AM PST by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 481-490 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson