Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interest in Outdoor Wood Boilers Grows (Nanny State Wants More Control)
Yahoooooo! ^ | November 22, 2007 | Stephanie Reitz

Posted on 11/23/2007 6:18:58 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin

Rob and Lynne Wallace jumped at the chance to install an outdoor wood boiler two years ago to heat their home and water supply.

For a year, they were immune to fluctuating fuel oil prices. Their family-owned tree service provided more than enough wood, stacked under a canopy near the furnace about 50 paces from their back patio.

But earlier this year, their small western Massachusetts town set limits on the outdoor boilers that forced the Wallaces to shut theirs down.

Concerned about air quality and neighborhood disputes, Hampden joined a growing number of communities nationwide setting their own rules on the increasingly popular wood boilers, which are not federally regulated. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends emissions and air quality standards, but does not regulate where and when the wood-fired burners can be installed or used.

Rules are patchy on the state level, too.

Some states, including Connecticut and Maine, have regulations and let their municipalities adopt even stricter limits or ban the boilers altogether. Massachusetts has considered statewide rules but has not enacted them, while Michigan offers a model ordinance that local governments can adopt in the absence of statewide standards.

The Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, a government coalition, estimates more than 155,000 wood boilers have been sold since 1990 in the Northeast, upper Midwest states and other areas prone to cold winters.

For those with easy access to wood, the boilers could make their homes among the few that are not vulnerable to swings in fuel oil and natural gas prices.

A recent Energy Department report says the cost of natural gas, used by 58 percent of American households, could rise 10 percent this winter. Heating oil, used by 7 percent of the country's homes, could jump 22 percent. Those who use electricity and propane will also see increases, with the prices of those sources estimated to rise 4 percent and 16 percent, respectively, this winter.

The Wallaces and others say wood boilers are an economical heat source that uses a renewable resource rather than dwindling foreign fuels.

"We're not hillbillies or trashy people. We're educated people who did our homework before we made our purchase, and we made it a point to operate it very conscientiously," said Lynne Wallace, whose unit would comply with the new town rules only if they spend thousands to move it elsewhere on their land.

The boilers resemble small sheds and burn wood to heat water, which is piped underground to the nearby home or other structure to provide heat and hot water. Some owners also use them for hot tubs, greenhouses and businesses such as dairy barns.

Depending on their size, their purchase price can range from about $5,000 to $15,000. That does not include pouring the foundation on which they sit, installing underground piping, extending the unit's smoke stack to exceed the height of any nearby roof, and other costs.

Their proliferation has prompted disputes over where they can be operated, the amount and smell of smoke emitted and other neighborhood issues. Many of those conflicts are being played out in town meetings and the offices of selectmen, mayors and health boards.

"You don't realize what you're dealing with until you get this haze all around your house and your back yard," said Chris Anderson, who bought his home in East Longmeadow, Mass., last year before learning that his neighbor had one of the boilers.

That 13-square-mile town, surrounded on all sides by communities with limits on the units, is considering its own rules. Emotions have been running high, however, about whether the limits should include existing units — as in neighboring Hampden — or apply only to newly installed boilers.

"My wife and I saved up for our dream house and this is the biggest investment of my life, and we can't enjoy it," Anderson said. "I'm not saying they should be banned everywhere, if they're put up in a good place away from other houses, but why should we be smoked out?"

Advocates of the boilers say irresponsible users — those who burn trash, chemically treated wood and other unacceptable substances — are ruining it for others who stick to the clean, seasoned wood recommended by manufacturers.

"We beg our customers to extend their chimneys higher up so the smoke disperses where their neighbors aren't affected, and we beg our customers to burn only the right wood," said Scott Bradley, owner of Mainline Heating & Supply of Ashford, Conn.

"We tell them you have the right to use a wood burner and stop using foreign oil, but you never have the right to smoke out your neighbor," he said.

In an attempt to avert such problems, Connecticut requires the boilers to be at least 200 feet from the nearest home not served by the unit, and also mandates chimney heights and the quality of the wood to be burned.

But those rules apply only to burners installed after July 2005, and towns can set stricter regulations or refuse to "grandfather in" older units if they wish. Some communities have banned the outdoor boilers altogether, including several in western Massachusetts and the eastern Connecticut towns of Hebron and Tolland.

Robert Girard, assistant director of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection's air enforcement division, said the department urges potential buyers to research whether their site is suitable before they make the purchase.

"Sometimes they're just not put in the right place because of the topography, the closeness of neighbors, things like that," he said. "There have been a number of cases where people have had to remove the units after they've spent a lot of money to put them in."

The Wallace family, which has returned to oil heat for their Hampden home, is still pondering what to do about the wood-fired boiler that sits cold and empty outside their house.

"It would have paid for itself in a few years," Lynne Wallace said, peering into the unit's firebox on a chilly recent morning. "And here it sits, off."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Rb ver. 2.0
BBQ grills are next.

Next? --> http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119460.html

21 posted on 11/23/2007 7:10:43 AM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the enemy at least you can piss on their god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I don’t know what they are referring to a small town in the article, but living close is not the place for the outdoor type wood heating appliance. On the other hand if city slickers want to move to the country they need to be aware of where they are moving. Here in the country we have wood smoke, farms and the smells associated with them, dust and pollen, thats just the way it is. I wonder about people that move out into the country and the first thing they do is start complaining. One more thing, funny how a party against over regulation wants to regulate all the time.
22 posted on 11/23/2007 7:10:51 AM PST by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Proud wood burner here.

After throwing a couple more logs into the stove, I went outside to look up at the chimney. All I saw was a small wisp of smoke, nothing like the scenarios I have read in previous posts. Of course, I only burn hardwood that has been seasoned for about 2 years, and I never burn trash, pressure treated or pine.

Most of the folks in my neighborhood burn wood and I have never heard a complaint.


23 posted on 11/23/2007 7:12:20 AM PST by ArmedConservative (Visualize No Liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

I live in rural TN and my neighbor has one of the wood burning boilers. His is pretty smokey at times but it doesn’t bother anybody because the houses are few and far apart. Everybody here uses wood burning stoves, including me. Mine is going right now. If you burn good seasoned wood the smoke is not normally a problem. It’s a cheap source of energy for us. We have 14 acres in trees and cut trees that are already down and dry.

I’m very allergic to cigarette smoke but wood smoke doesn’t bother me at all. I’ve only had two bad experiences with the wood burning stove, once when I burned wood that poison ivy had been growing on and once when I burned some Black Walnut.


24 posted on 11/23/2007 7:12:47 AM PST by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; Eric Blair 2084

This will not end with OWB.
They will be going after Fireplaces, Wood Stoves & BBQ’s next.
It’s the natural progression of the nanny-state.

How do you like your steak?
Rare-boiled, Medium boiled or Well-done boiled?


25 posted on 11/23/2007 7:13:54 AM PST by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"We're not hillbillies or trashy people. We're educated people who did our homework before we made our purchase, and we made it a point to operate it very conscientiously..."

Apparently, it is still quite alright to stereotype and malign hillbillies and trashy people, without raising so much as an eyebrow from the reporter or anyone else.

26 posted on 11/23/2007 7:15:17 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
27 posted on 11/23/2007 7:17:38 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I have one of these furnaces. It takes a lot of firewood, and regular trips outside to monitor and refill, but the cost of propane makes it worthwhile.

The smoke is awful. I have about 15 feet of smokestack, but some windless days, that is not enough.

I would NEVER use this furnace if there was a neighbor in the smoke path. For those who do not recognize their neighbor’s right for smokefree air around their home, then we need laws.


28 posted on 11/23/2007 7:18:59 AM PST by cmet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racer1
I've got news for the writers fuel numbers, heating oil is up about 18-20% already this year.

Average cost of heating oil is up 35% over last year.

This Week In Petroleum
Residential Heating Oil Prices
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip_distillate.html#prices

29 posted on 11/23/2007 7:19:16 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArmedConservative

I live in the City of Tampa and burn well seasoned pecan wood in my fireplace every chilly night. Not only do the neighbors not complain, they always comment on how nice it smells.


30 posted on 11/23/2007 7:20:35 AM PST by WackySam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

they are worse than hillbillies, they are noreasteners


31 posted on 11/23/2007 7:21:39 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505
Teddy Roosevelt started the national parks system because the national appetite for wood threatened to deforest the entire country, with 1900 levels of population and energy consumption. If we tried to sustain our current energy consumption levels using wood, or other forms of biomass, we’d be deforested in a generation. (May well happen anyway.)

Pollution is a legitimate “neighborhood” effect. Historically, wood burning hasn’t been regulated because “everyone” did it and we all recognized that tolerating others soot and ash was the price we paid for staying warm in the winter.

I wonder why coal hasn’t made a comeback? My family used coal in Queens as recently as 1960. (We still had an icebox in Manhattan as recently as 1954. No refrigerator. The iceman lugged a huge block of ice up several flights of steps a couple times a week.) Coal has a lot of the drawbacks of wood. In the 1950’s the coal truck was a common sight rumbling down the street and dumping a barrel or two of anthracite down the coal chute into the basement.

32 posted on 11/23/2007 7:21:40 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The libertarian in me repels at regulation, but imagining that wood heat is environmentally friendly is self-delusion of the worst kind.

The constitutionalist in me doesn't mind the local regulations nearly as much as federal regulations handed down with assinine claims of "regulating interstate commerce".

33 posted on 11/23/2007 7:21:41 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ArmedConservative
Aren't the logs in those systems about 4 feet long? Seems like loading could be a problem. Then again, I think I read that you just have to stoke those systems once a day.

Nam Vet

34 posted on 11/23/2007 7:23:03 AM PST by Nam Vet (Timely reporting from Attila's right flank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Melinda in TN
Our Lopi wood stove is lit and running right now. Fired by seasoned black oak that was cut and split two or three years ago, we get very little smoke and my neighbors are far enough away so it wouldn't matter if it was smoky.
The free standing outdoor burners are a different animal; lots and lots of smoke, like it was fan-driven. And with a stack about five feet off the ground, there is little opportunity for dispersion. A higher stack would resolve most of the problem but I'd have to be supported with cable...
35 posted on 11/23/2007 7:23:18 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505
"Actually there is more forest now than there has ever been since the area was settled."

I can't cite you a statistical source, but a few years ago I was told by someone (in a position to know, and with no incentive to lie) that the United States presently has a greater percentage of forestation than at the time Lewis and Clark conducted their exploration of the American west.

36 posted on 11/23/2007 7:23:29 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker
Don’t tell the people of Newfoundland that!

See how they like living in a denuded wasteland when Toronto converts to wood burning.

37 posted on 11/23/2007 7:24:23 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thats even worse. I was going by what oil users in this area have told me since beginning of Sept. I don’t use stuff myself.


38 posted on 11/23/2007 7:24:26 AM PST by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
You are on to something. Your right to fill the air will smoke and soot ends at the tip of my nose.

Then stop driving your car if you have the courage of your convictions.

39 posted on 11/23/2007 7:29:12 AM PST by Centurion2000 (False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Coal really belongs in industrial boilers like utilities and big manufacturing settings. From first-hand experience I can tell you, the storage, handling, burning and disposal of ash is a filthy job. Its had to believe, but even residual oil is a cleaner fuel (except when its spilled in a marine environment.)
40 posted on 11/23/2007 7:30:16 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson