Posted on 11/23/2007 6:18:58 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
Rob and Lynne Wallace jumped at the chance to install an outdoor wood boiler two years ago to heat their home and water supply.
For a year, they were immune to fluctuating fuel oil prices. Their family-owned tree service provided more than enough wood, stacked under a canopy near the furnace about 50 paces from their back patio.
But earlier this year, their small western Massachusetts town set limits on the outdoor boilers that forced the Wallaces to shut theirs down.
Concerned about air quality and neighborhood disputes, Hampden joined a growing number of communities nationwide setting their own rules on the increasingly popular wood boilers, which are not federally regulated. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends emissions and air quality standards, but does not regulate where and when the wood-fired burners can be installed or used.
Rules are patchy on the state level, too.
Some states, including Connecticut and Maine, have regulations and let their municipalities adopt even stricter limits or ban the boilers altogether. Massachusetts has considered statewide rules but has not enacted them, while Michigan offers a model ordinance that local governments can adopt in the absence of statewide standards.
The Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, a government coalition, estimates more than 155,000 wood boilers have been sold since 1990 in the Northeast, upper Midwest states and other areas prone to cold winters.
For those with easy access to wood, the boilers could make their homes among the few that are not vulnerable to swings in fuel oil and natural gas prices.
A recent Energy Department report says the cost of natural gas, used by 58 percent of American households, could rise 10 percent this winter. Heating oil, used by 7 percent of the country's homes, could jump 22 percent. Those who use electricity and propane will also see increases, with the prices of those sources estimated to rise 4 percent and 16 percent, respectively, this winter.
The Wallaces and others say wood boilers are an economical heat source that uses a renewable resource rather than dwindling foreign fuels.
"We're not hillbillies or trashy people. We're educated people who did our homework before we made our purchase, and we made it a point to operate it very conscientiously," said Lynne Wallace, whose unit would comply with the new town rules only if they spend thousands to move it elsewhere on their land.
The boilers resemble small sheds and burn wood to heat water, which is piped underground to the nearby home or other structure to provide heat and hot water. Some owners also use them for hot tubs, greenhouses and businesses such as dairy barns.
Depending on their size, their purchase price can range from about $5,000 to $15,000. That does not include pouring the foundation on which they sit, installing underground piping, extending the unit's smoke stack to exceed the height of any nearby roof, and other costs.
Their proliferation has prompted disputes over where they can be operated, the amount and smell of smoke emitted and other neighborhood issues. Many of those conflicts are being played out in town meetings and the offices of selectmen, mayors and health boards.
"You don't realize what you're dealing with until you get this haze all around your house and your back yard," said Chris Anderson, who bought his home in East Longmeadow, Mass., last year before learning that his neighbor had one of the boilers.
That 13-square-mile town, surrounded on all sides by communities with limits on the units, is considering its own rules. Emotions have been running high, however, about whether the limits should include existing units as in neighboring Hampden or apply only to newly installed boilers.
"My wife and I saved up for our dream house and this is the biggest investment of my life, and we can't enjoy it," Anderson said. "I'm not saying they should be banned everywhere, if they're put up in a good place away from other houses, but why should we be smoked out?"
Advocates of the boilers say irresponsible users those who burn trash, chemically treated wood and other unacceptable substances are ruining it for others who stick to the clean, seasoned wood recommended by manufacturers.
"We beg our customers to extend their chimneys higher up so the smoke disperses where their neighbors aren't affected, and we beg our customers to burn only the right wood," said Scott Bradley, owner of Mainline Heating & Supply of Ashford, Conn.
"We tell them you have the right to use a wood burner and stop using foreign oil, but you never have the right to smoke out your neighbor," he said.
In an attempt to avert such problems, Connecticut requires the boilers to be at least 200 feet from the nearest home not served by the unit, and also mandates chimney heights and the quality of the wood to be burned.
But those rules apply only to burners installed after July 2005, and towns can set stricter regulations or refuse to "grandfather in" older units if they wish. Some communities have banned the outdoor boilers altogether, including several in western Massachusetts and the eastern Connecticut towns of Hebron and Tolland.
Robert Girard, assistant director of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection's air enforcement division, said the department urges potential buyers to research whether their site is suitable before they make the purchase.
"Sometimes they're just not put in the right place because of the topography, the closeness of neighbors, things like that," he said. "There have been a number of cases where people have had to remove the units after they've spent a lot of money to put them in."
The Wallace family, which has returned to oil heat for their Hampden home, is still pondering what to do about the wood-fired boiler that sits cold and empty outside their house.
"It would have paid for itself in a few years," Lynne Wallace said, peering into the unit's firebox on a chilly recent morning. "And here it sits, off."
Next? --> http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119460.html
Proud wood burner here.
After throwing a couple more logs into the stove, I went outside to look up at the chimney. All I saw was a small wisp of smoke, nothing like the scenarios I have read in previous posts. Of course, I only burn hardwood that has been seasoned for about 2 years, and I never burn trash, pressure treated or pine.
Most of the folks in my neighborhood burn wood and I have never heard a complaint.
I live in rural TN and my neighbor has one of the wood burning boilers. His is pretty smokey at times but it doesn’t bother anybody because the houses are few and far apart. Everybody here uses wood burning stoves, including me. Mine is going right now. If you burn good seasoned wood the smoke is not normally a problem. It’s a cheap source of energy for us. We have 14 acres in trees and cut trees that are already down and dry.
I’m very allergic to cigarette smoke but wood smoke doesn’t bother me at all. I’ve only had two bad experiences with the wood burning stove, once when I burned wood that poison ivy had been growing on and once when I burned some Black Walnut.
This will not end with OWB.
They will be going after Fireplaces, Wood Stoves & BBQ’s next.
It’s the natural progression of the nanny-state.
How do you like your steak?
Rare-boiled, Medium boiled or Well-done boiled?
Apparently, it is still quite alright to stereotype and malign hillbillies and trashy people, without raising so much as an eyebrow from the reporter or anyone else.
I have one of these furnaces. It takes a lot of firewood, and regular trips outside to monitor and refill, but the cost of propane makes it worthwhile.
The smoke is awful. I have about 15 feet of smokestack, but some windless days, that is not enough.
I would NEVER use this furnace if there was a neighbor in the smoke path. For those who do not recognize their neighbor’s right for smokefree air around their home, then we need laws.
Average cost of heating oil is up 35% over last year.
This Week In Petroleum
Residential Heating Oil Prices
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip_distillate.html#prices
I live in the City of Tampa and burn well seasoned pecan wood in my fireplace every chilly night. Not only do the neighbors not complain, they always comment on how nice it smells.
they are worse than hillbillies, they are noreasteners
Pollution is a legitimate “neighborhood” effect. Historically, wood burning hasn’t been regulated because “everyone” did it and we all recognized that tolerating others soot and ash was the price we paid for staying warm in the winter.
I wonder why coal hasn’t made a comeback? My family used coal in Queens as recently as 1960. (We still had an icebox in Manhattan as recently as 1954. No refrigerator. The iceman lugged a huge block of ice up several flights of steps a couple times a week.) Coal has a lot of the drawbacks of wood. In the 1950’s the coal truck was a common sight rumbling down the street and dumping a barrel or two of anthracite down the coal chute into the basement.
The constitutionalist in me doesn't mind the local regulations nearly as much as federal regulations handed down with assinine claims of "regulating interstate commerce".
Nam Vet
I can't cite you a statistical source, but a few years ago I was told by someone (in a position to know, and with no incentive to lie) that the United States presently has a greater percentage of forestation than at the time Lewis and Clark conducted their exploration of the American west.
See how they like living in a denuded wasteland when Toronto converts to wood burning.
Thats even worse. I was going by what oil users in this area have told me since beginning of Sept. I don’t use stuff myself.
Then stop driving your car if you have the courage of your convictions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.