Posted on 11/19/2007 6:00:13 AM PST by tlb
After the Republican debate on Tuesday evening in Dearborn, Mich., a reporter from the Arab-American News asked Ron Paul what he thought of the term Islamic fascism.
Its a false term to make people think were fighting Hitler, Paul responded. Its war propaganda designed to generate fear so that the war has to be spread.
The call has gone out to all the Muslim Americans to hurry up and register to vote Republican so that they can vote in the Republican Primary to support Ron Paul, the anti-interventionist, non-isolationist candidate for President of the United States. Muslims are opening their wallets and joining teaparty07.com as well.
An anonymous Ron Paul supporter posted the following message on the internet: Muslims and Americans have an unique window of opportunity for the 2008 election. There is a candidate running as a Republican that would work to completely cut off the funding to Israel, remove ALL US troops from Arab lands, and repeal the Patriot Act. Hes a Republican with Libertarian views named Ron Paul. Ron Pauls policies ranging from monetary to foreign are top notch. Till now Muslims and Americans have not had an American Presidential candidate that really suited their best interests. This election is unique in that we have a man running as a Republican that speaks the truth We know the current policies in the Middle East are failing, not only making it less safe in the world but hurting and killing innocent Muslims, which our media callously calls collateral damage. It is our duty as Muslims to follow the truth regardless of how futile it may seem. Ron Paul is the only candidate that does not seem to be swayed by the influential lobbies that the other candidates are catering to.
Ron Paul stood up in Congress in 2006 and opposed a resolution that sided with Israel in the Lebanon-Israel conflict. He stated the following.
Ron Paul: Mr. Speaker, I follow a policy in foreign affairs called non-interventionism. I do not believe we are making the United States more secure when we involve ourselves in conflicts overseas. The Constitution really doesnt authorize us to be the policemen of the world, much less to favor one side over another in foreign conflicts. It is very clear, reading this resolution objectively, that all the terrorists are on one side and all the victims and the innocents are on the other side. I find this unfair, particularly considering the significantly higher number of civilian casualties among Lebanese civilians. I would rather advocate neutrality rather than picking sides, which is what this resolution does.
Ron Paul has also sponsored a bill to overturn the Patriot Act. He is one of the few members of Congress from either of the major houses that is speaking rationally about these issues. How can we get everyone, and I mean everyone, to join the Ron Paul Republican voter sign-up campaign?
There is general frustration with politicians these days, and the unwillingness to believe that supporting a particular candidate will make a difference. But whether Ron Paul wins or loses, ronpaul.meetup.com is a great way to meet your neighbors who are against the war and organize the community on a grassroots level. If something like Katrina ever happened to us, knowing our neighbors could mean the difference between life and death to our families.
The common thread Ive been reading lately about leftists and Jews is that they are having trouble getting more than a dozen people to come to their stuff (whether anti-Zionist or Zionist). The anti-Israel movement is not moving forward, because protest Zionist imperialism is just not a catchy slogan. By contrast, there are over 400 RP activists against war taxes in Boston alone. Every day the list of passionate anti-war activists grows. Very few of them agree with every single RP position, they just want to get the Lobby out of the way and pull the troops out of Iraq.
One reason its working is because of the software. They made the ronpaul.meetup.com site almost like a dating site, where you can make friends with people in or near your zip code. They made it very easy to get together with new people to join the activism. You cant beat technology, may as well use it.
In the event that RP actually won the election and got the Hamas treatment, his supporters are fully in support of the Right to Bear Arms. It would be interesting to see what followed.
If anti-war protesters want to continue to focus on the genocidal machinations of the global zionist-imperialist military, industrial, financial, political, neoliberal, media complex, they have to be willing to meet with anyone any time to hear what ideas people have to address this, which is our primary responsibility - even if they are Republicans.
If you ever saw Ron Paul in an interview it cannot be said that he avoids discussing vital issues. He is someone who is willing to make a statement and stick by it even when no one agrees with him. I dont believe in electoral politics but its not that much sweat off my brow to go and vote to end war.
I think the fact that NO pro-Israel group will let Ron Paul speak at their convention, not even peace Zionists, is evidence enough that he is the only person to put in charge as commander-in-chief. And, even if he loses, making all these contacts with local anti-interventionists is priceless. If you want to expand the peace movement so that it overlaps with the freedom movement like ripples in a pond, you just have to respect the fact that people might agree with you, but for different reasons.
And he's a pro-abortion gun-grabber. Those issues are more important to me personally. Thompson, Hunter, McCain or Romney would be just as good as Rudy on the WoT anyway. I really cannot conceive of any non-fanboy reasoning to support Rudy.
You're on crack.
Most of us would question our candidate if Mooselips were supporting them, but not the Kookites. They just close their eyes and ears while they mumble Constitution. His support is starting to look like the Blazing Saddles Gang.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Attacking a fellow poster over a minor typo is a sign of someone with an extremely weak position.
Which candidates support foreign aid to Arab countries and a "Palestinian Peace Plan"?
No. But if I were I would be thinner and more able to take these RP supporters.
Muslims and Americans
That is exactly how they view themselves...all the privileges of living here in order to destroy us from within.
Ron Paul totally disregards the Federal Governments responsibility to protect the lives of the unborn. (I.E. He is NOT prolife anymore than Hillary Clinton)
&
Ron Paul totally disregards the importance of having any sort of codification of REAL marriage and the inherent rights thereof. (I.E. He is JUST as much of a gay marriage accomdator as John Edwards.)
Those issues are pretty important too me.
The second attack came 9 years later.
Who’s advising Ron Paul on the Al Qaeda threat anyway? Bagdad Bob?
Fair enough. Please just respect those of us whose main concerns are the 2nd Amendment, small government and abortion and prefer Paul over Rudy. I'm a Thompson supporter personally, but I still like Ron Paul due to his outstanding domestic positions.
That's the final word as far as I'm concerned. Good call!
That's because you are either blind or lying. Do you Paulists actually think we are stupid, when you pretend that your candidate has no massive support from the rabidly leftist anti-war crowd and the screwballs from stormfront? And the Islamos for obvious reasons have the greatest interest in Paul as President. Bizarro world indeed.
The right of an innocent, unborn child to life is at the heart of the American ideals of liberty. My professional and legislative record demonstrates my strong commitment to this pro-life principle.
In 40 years of medical practice, I never once considered performing an abortion, nor did I ever find abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.
I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life. This is a practical, direct approach to ending federal court tyranny which threatens our constitutional republic and has caused the deaths of 45 million of the unborn.
I have also authored HR 1095, which prevents federal funds to be used for so-called population control.
Many talk about being pro-life. I have taken direct action to restore protection for the unborn.
As an OB/GYN doctor, Ive delivered over 4,000 babies. That experience has made me an unshakable foe of abortion. Many of you may have read my book, Challenge To Liberty, which champions the idea that there cannot be liberty in a society unless the rights of all innocents are protected. Much can be understood about the civility of a society in observing its regard for the dignity of human life.
...broad coalition of criminally insane Nazis, Muslims and Communists.
Paul's cut and run plan would be more dangerous than when Clinton just ignored them. Paul's plan would empower AQ and they would rebuild with renewed energy and confidence that they have defeated the U.S.!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.