Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GulfBreeze
Ron Paul totally disregards the Federal Governments responsibility to protect the lives of the unborn. (I.E. He is NOT prolife anymore than Hillary Clinton)

The right of an innocent, unborn child to life is at the heart of the American ideals of liberty. My professional and legislative record demonstrates my strong commitment to this pro-life principle.

In 40 years of medical practice, I never once considered performing an abortion, nor did I ever find abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.

In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.

I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life. This is a practical, direct approach to ending federal court tyranny which threatens our constitutional republic and has caused the deaths of 45 million of the unborn.

I have also authored HR 1095, which prevents federal funds to be used for so-called “population control.”

Many talk about being pro-life. I have taken direct action to restore protection for the unborn.

As an OB/GYN doctor, I’ve delivered over 4,000 babies. That experience has made me an unshakable foe of abortion. Many of you may have read my book, Challenge To Liberty, which champions the idea that there cannot be liberty in a society unless the rights of all innocents are protected. Much can be understood about the civility of a society in observing its regard for the dignity of human life.

59 posted on 11/19/2007 7:34:41 AM PST by jmc813 (.) (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: jmc813

Smoke and mirrors.

He may define life anytime he wants but he believes there should be NO, NONE, NADA effort from the Federal Government to protect that same life. Including being opposed to a properly executed constitutional ammendment to clarify the ALREADY written clauses in the constitution protecting the life of American Citizens (born or unborn).


65 posted on 11/19/2007 7:39:13 AM PST by GulfBreeze (Support America? Then support Duncan Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813; jrooney; GulfBreeze
jmc813: Yes, he has done no abortions but neither have many fully pro-abort OB-GYNs. The paleophony Dr. Demento (whatever his personal views) insists that the fedgov has no jurisdiction over abortion more than three decades after SCOTUS crammed it down our throats. That makes paleoPaulie, pro-life holy pictures or not, the last refuge of Planned Barrenhood and NARAL. Who gives a rat’s patoot as to the paleopipsqueak’s personal opinions when he refuses to DO anything adequate to stop the American Holocaust. Passing the buck to the states on abortion (Spitzer, Schwarzenneger, Blagojevich, Napolitano, Sebelius, etc) is no final solution to the abortionist problem any more than cowering in the paleoPaulie hidey hole praying that the baaad people go awaaaay a la Neville Chamberlain is a solution to the Islamofascist problem.
224 posted on 11/19/2007 2:46:44 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson