Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Handsome By Chance: Why Humans Look Different From Neanderthals
Science Daily ^ | 8-16-2007 | U/C Davis

Posted on 08/19/2007 5:45:36 PM PDT by blam

Source: University of California, Davis
Date: August 16, 2007

Handsome By Chance: Why Humans Look Different From Neanderthals

Science Daily — Chance, not natural selection, best explains why the modern human skull looks so different from that of its Neanderthal relative, according to a new study led by Tim Weaver, assistant professor of anthropology at UC Davis.

Model of the Neanderthal man. Exhibited in the Dinosaur Park Münchehagen, Germany. (Credit: iStockphoto/Klaus Nilkens)

"For 150 years, scientists have tried to decipher why Neanderthal skulls are different from those of modern humans," Weaver said. "Most accounts have emphasized natural selection and the possible adaptive value of either Neanderthal or modern human traits. We show that instead, random changes over the past 500,000 years or so – since Neanderthals and modern humans became isolated from each other – are the best explanation for these differences."

Weaver and his colleagues compared cranial measurements of 2,524 modern human skulls and 20 Neanderthal specimens, then contrasted those results with genetic information from a separate sample of 1,056 modern humans.

The scientists concluded that Neanderthals did not develop their protruding mid-faces as an adaptation to icy Pleistocene weather or the demands of using teeth as tools, and the retracted faces of modern humans are not an adaptation for language, as some anthropologists have proposed.

Instead, random "genetic drift" is the likeliest reason for these skull differences.

Weaver conducted the research with Charles Roseman, an anthropologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London.

The study appears in the August issue of the Journal of Human Evolution.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University of California, Davis.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anthropology; godsgravesglyphs; handsome; me; modernhuman; neandertal; neanderthals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: blam

Who besides Helen Tomas is old enough to have seen these monkeys?


21 posted on 08/19/2007 7:27:28 PM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

File this under “one guess is as good as another”.


22 posted on 08/19/2007 7:33:35 PM PDT by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Does it have somethng to do with Government Employees and car insurance?


23 posted on 08/19/2007 7:44:18 PM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar--Quae Cum Ita Sunt, (Since these things are so))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

There is no physical evidence for long hair, on the head or the face. That is an artist imagination at work. Take away the hair, and the resemblance is even closer!


24 posted on 08/19/2007 7:47:14 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Why would you think they had short hair?


25 posted on 08/19/2007 8:01:51 PM PDT by dwhole2th (''God gets you to the plate, but once you're there, you're on your own". Ted Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam
Humans rank among the most repulsive, foul smelling creatures on the planet.

Which is why humans started adorning themselves with the furs of animals and the feathers of birds.

And why cats don’t need to wear lipstck.

26 posted on 08/19/2007 8:18:03 PM PDT by Griddlee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dwhole2th

Why would you think they had long hair, for beards?


27 posted on 08/19/2007 8:29:17 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Cuz they were primitive creatures and like lots of primitive people I know, or knew in college, they weren’t all that keen on grooming and such.

Now why do you think they had short hair?


28 posted on 08/19/2007 8:34:52 PM PDT by dwhole2th (''God gets you to the plate, but once you're there, you're on your own". Ted Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blam

29 posted on 08/19/2007 8:36:36 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([Thompson 2008!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Yes - it might even look like...like...a modern man! Yahoo!


30 posted on 08/19/2007 8:37:57 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Griddlee
Humans rank among the most repulsive, foul smelling creatures on the planet.

Speak for yourself.

And try soap, deodorant and plastic surgery if it's so offensive.

31 posted on 08/19/2007 8:39:51 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dwhole2th

I think there is no way to know one way or the other. It is strictly artistic license, there is no scientific evidence. Just like there is no evidence that there bodies were covered with long hair, as they are often depicted.


32 posted on 08/19/2007 8:42:36 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
OK, I'll be the first to do a serious post.

LOL!
33 posted on 08/19/2007 8:44:09 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Griddlee

You’ve been hanging out with the Houynyms too long...


34 posted on 08/19/2007 8:45:54 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
OK, I'll be the first to do a serious post.

LOL!

At least my post was serious, and made an attempt to address the article.

Your "LOL!" was neither.

If you disagree, let's hear all about it.

35 posted on 08/19/2007 9:06:00 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
Sorry, I didn’t mean to offend gorgeous people like you.

I was just trying to be funny.

36 posted on 08/19/2007 9:15:58 PM PDT by Griddlee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


37 posted on 08/19/2007 9:30:48 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Your "LOL!" was neither

Seems like it went over your head. My post was both addressing the topic and was a 'serious' reply.
38 posted on 08/19/2007 9:33:28 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Oh, c'mon, Blam, we can *never* have too many Neandertopics. ;')
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve
Frayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]

39 posted on 08/19/2007 9:47:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Friday, August 17, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
Thanks Blam.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

40 posted on 08/19/2007 9:47:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Friday, August 17, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson