Well, he’s certainly no George Bush is he?
Conservative first, Republican if it is a conservative party.
Thank you Jim.
IF?!?!?!?
A good next step would be to post a series of messages defining (in historical and philosophical terms) just what Conservatism is. For example, Russell Kirk's definition:
Conservatism is not a fixed and immutable body of dogmata; conservatives inherit from Burke a talent for re-expressing their convictions to fit the time. As a working premise, nevertheless, one can observe here that the essence of social conservatism is preservation of the ancient moral traditions of humanity. Conservatives respect the wisdom of their ancestors . . .; they are dubious of wholesale alteration. They think society is a spiritual reality, possessing an eternal life but a delicate constitution: it cannot be scrapped and recast as if it were a machine. . . .Shall we compromise and define ourselves primarily by our desire to be on the winning team, or define ourselves by our principles and stick by them, win or lose? I can't speak for the rest of FR, but I choose the latter.I think that there are six canons of conservative thought--
(1) Belief in a transcendent order, or body of natural law, which rules society as well as conscience. Political problems, at bottom, are religious and moral problems. A narrow rationality . . . cannot of itself satisfy human needs. . . . True politics is the art of apprehending and applying the Justice which ought to prevail in a community of souls.
(2) Affection for the proliferating variety and mystery of human existence, as opposed to the narrowing uniformity, egalitarianism, and utilitarian aims of most radical systems; conservatives resist what Robert Graves calls "Logicalism" in society. . . .
(3) Conviction that civilized society requires orders and classes, as against the notion of a "classless society." With reason, conservatives have often been called "the party of order." If natural distinctions are effaced among men, oligarchs fill the vacuum. Ultimate equality in the judgment of God, and equality before courts of law, are recognized by conservatives; but equality of condition, they think, means equality in servitude and boredom. (4) Persuasion that freedom and property are closely linked: separate property from private possession, and Leviathan becomes master of all. Economic levelling, they maintain, is not progress.
(5) Faith in prescription and distrust of "sophisters, calculators, and economists" who would reconstruct society upon abstract desings. Custom, convention, and old prescription are checks both upon man's anarchic impulse and upon the innovator's lust for power.
(6) Recognition that change may not be salutory reform: hasty innovation may be a devouring conflagration, rather than a torch of progress. Society must alter, for prudent change is the means of social preservation; but a statesman must take Providence into his calculations, and a statesman's chief virtue, according to Plato and Burke, is prudence. . . .
In a revolutionary epoch, sometimes men taste every novelty, sicken of them all, and return to ancient principles so long disused that they seem refreshingly hearty when they are rediscovered. . . . The true conservative thinks of this process [of historical change and conflagration], which looks like chance or fate, as, rather, the providential operation of a moral law of polarity. And Burke, could he see our century, never would concede that a consumption-society, so near to suicide, is the end for which Providence has prepared man. If a conservative order is indeed to return, we ought to know the tradition which is attached to it, so that we may rebuild society; if it is not to be restored, still we ought to understand conservative ideas so that we may rake from the ashes what scorched fragments of civilization escape the conflagration of unchecked will and appetite.
The Conservative Mind, (pp. 7-9, 10) Source
“Do you really expect me to do that?”
I will never vote for rudie. I will always vote against him.
“Do you really expect me to do that?”
I will never vote for rudie. I will always vote against him.
JRob for Pres! We’re with you, man!
ping
"The state remains, as it was in the beginning, the common enemy of all well-disposed, industrious and decent men." -- H. L. Mencken.
You can't change the nature of the beast. You can't make government less socialist. You can't reform it. You can't make it work better. You can't make it work at all!
Politics cannot fix this. Politics itself is by its nature corrupt. In time, it defiles everything it touches. We never solve our problems by turning them over to politicians. That is like pouring more gasoline on the inferno.
Our goal is not to have a conservative government -- ain't no such thing. It is to make government smaller. Barry Goldwater had it exactly right: “I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size." And that always boils down to the fight to reduce its taxation.
Free men have to fight with the tools of freedom. We must make the most of free markets and free institutions to solve our problems. Foremost, for ourselves, is our freedom to think, speak and publish here in Free Republic. FR is a potent voice and a potent tool for right thinking. It is like the antidote to politics.
Should Free Republic ever lower its sights and seek no more than to get some politician -- any politician -- elected, it may as well fold up shop. But I'm not worried about that day coming. We have a good shop here and always will, so long as we remember what we're trying to achieve.
Rudy is not, cannot be the one.
My household will not vote for Rudy! I really don’t think he will win the Republican nomination, and I pray he doesn’t! A family member sent this beautiful song to me today. Just wanted to share it with you and everyone on FR. Perhaps many of you have already heard it, but this evening was the first time for me. “In God We Still Trust”
http://gunbarrelcityradio.com/InGodWeStillTrust.wmv
No, and me and mine won't bow down either.
“Do you really expect me to do that?”
When pigs fly, and liberals don’t lie and the oceans go dry.............nope!
Nam Vet
Fred Dalton Thompson has everything under control.
He wanted to let Rudy McRomney have a free run for awhile so that when he stepped in we'd appreciate him more.
**Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?**
I certainly hope not.
“Cuss word” NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!