Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Brad’s Gramma]

Is this better, Bigh4u2?

:)

[jedward]

YES!

[Spiff]

Another anonymous FReeper just FReepmailed me and said that, because of this thread, she'd upped her monthly to a dollar-a-day. Let's see..$365 - $120 (her previous donation) comes to another $245!

[rockrr]

(about Registered): “He was tweaking Jim Robinson earlier in this thread and I guess he went a little too far.”

He went hard up against the wall and just kept slamming!

I really liked his earlier work, but he went over to the dark side and acted personally offended when Jimrob reined in.

Pity.

Sad.

Stupid.

[Bigh4u2]

MUCH!

lol!

[Brad’s Gramma]

WHOOO HOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Thank you, Anonymous Freeper!!!!!

:)

[DCPatriot]

Not at all. I agree that they foolishly put themselves in a position to be booted...in this thread.

"Pragmatic" in a sense that many voters feel that Satan himself would be better than President Hillary Rodham Clinton on my collection of Presidential commemorative coffee cups.

And while I learned a ton about the vices of Rudy Giuliani in here...so far among those that have declared...he's the only one that could whip the Hildebeast...IMHO.

Hurry up Fred!

[Kevmo]

Yes, it’s noticeable already.

[processing please hold]

Oh my!!!!!!

[Brad’s Gramma]

WHOOO HOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Thank you, yet another Anonymous Freeper!!!!!

:)

[Jeff Head]

Of those Repubs that might run...for me, it's Duncan and Thompson in that order right now. Possibly Romney if he keeps talking the talk and walking the walk. Right now, for me, he hasn't been walking it for nearly long enough on several of those issues.

[Spiff]

"Pragmatic" in a sense that many voters feel that Satan himself would be better than President Hillary Rodham Clinton on my collection of Presidential commemorative coffee cups.

Voting for "Satan" is never pragmatic. It's evil. Like liberalism.

[Brad’s Gramma]

PHEW!

I wouldn't have been able to SLEEP tonight with all this worry....

:)

[Reagan Man]

Btw, thanks for the heads up calcowgirl.

A good decision. I’m sure NormsRevenge isn’t sorry to see the grunt get the boot either.

[EternalVigilance]

Just a few more grand and Jim’ll be even on the bounty he could have gotten for our heads! ;-)

Good work!

[NoGrayZone]

Wooohooo!!! If this keeps up, we’ll never have the need to do another Freepathon again!!!! People are surely putting their money where their mouth is! Go Freepers!!!!

[The Blitherer]

Voting for "Satan" is never pragmatic. It's evil.

Must I remind you:

"If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil." - Churchill

:-)

[T'wit]

>> I am badmouthing nobody.

Jim let you come back and you "thank" him by badmouthing Free Republic with nearly every post.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

cicero’s son was the only person on FR to ever call me a rude name.

Not surprised, though.

[pissant]

Goes with my Murse