Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
I'll see ya later this afternoon. God bless and take care, KAC.
“Have freepers settled on a nickname for this thread yet? Because I kinda like your “Yellow Smoke & Bug Zapper” weekend.”
Wish I had cornered the coffee market for this thread....
ROFL
And you too!
And a difficult war it is. We cannot afford to lose it.
The popcorn concessions are overflowing....
The movie, Mr Majestic is credited with moving Ford pickups to the #1 slot.
All the scenes were filmed using the same truck without any repairs.
I’ved been waiting for someomne else to say this..It may have been said already but just in case...
What happened to “Just say no?”...
The woman’s “choice” starts and ends at her decision to have sex.......
BTW, did you or anybody see Bill Maher on Leno last nite?
He was really freaking out about the decimated honeybee population...while giving his standard anti-Bush administration rant.
I can live without ever hearing "Tomorrow" again.
I try to avoid Bill Maher at all costs. His purple lips are just so gross I can't watch him much less listen.
If we stop using cell phones and only use one sheet of TP per sitting will it stop the bee "slaughter"? Anything for the bees and polar bears I say...
Popcorn might have been even more lucrative...It’s gotten a huge number of views.
The right to her own body and decisions about what happens to it. We all should respect each other's right to our own bodies. Wouldn't you agree?
Well, if "We all should respect each other's right to our own bodies", what then of the body of the child within, with its own lifeforce, own DNA, own organs and cell structure?
The fundamental error of this tired and worn out line is that there are TWO individuals in the equation. When basic rights of two individuals conflict, then the resolution MUST be that which is least damaging to both, with consideration for circumstances. The temporary inconvenience of one does not balance the death of the other. Rights are not absolute.
Howdy, CM!
That should be our national anthem.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I thought it sorta fit this thread...
No, because there is no valid argument to be made to do so. She retains a choice that accomplishes what it is she seeks. That being not pregnant.
Today, the case is made that the unborn death is the result of no alternative, therefor it has to be accepted. Like in war, death of civilians has to be accepted as “part of it”. My position suggests removing that argument entirely by keeping a choice, a different one, instead of just removing it entirely.
Let me try it this way:
A sexual predator molests my child. Society has decided that rather than exact my own vengance, retribution and justice, the criminal justice system must do that in my place. My choice, my desire, to see that person punished has not been removed. An alternative, deemed more acceptable by society, was put in it’s place to attain the goal of punishment. I press charges instead of shooting the bastard. Do you see the parallel I am trying to draw there?
Shaka, an African king, once had the babies cut out of the bodies of hundreds of woman to see how they grew or some such reason...
When he realized that none of the women or babies would survive, he finally stopped...
Have freepers settled on a nickname for this thread yet? Because I kinda like your “Yellow Smoke & Bug Zapper” weekend.
~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ve seen it called the JR thread,,,but what ever works...
8,754 replies · 181,088+ views
"Sadly, no. Nobody will take him."--- Jim R
Number one, don't use the language that liberals use. It is not "pro-choice", it is "pro-abortion".
Second, prove it. Where did Giuliani say he supported the PBA ban pre-Bush signature? The quotes I have are from 1999 and 2000 and I've not seen anything since until very recently while he was running for President and started lying about his past positions. If you've got a quote, I'd like to see it.
Much of yesterday’s science fiction are today called cures.
What is the moral issue you speak of? Could you please be specific?
A warnin about what? That I should not talk about a possible way I see of doing away with the destruction of unborn children?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.