Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Miss Marple]

Just my opinion, from what I know about her.

[NittanyLion]

"Up yours, asswipe!" is a frequent summary of your feelings towards people?

Maybe the poster's real name is Sheryl Crow.

[Spiff]

M. Thatcher just oppused from FR via FReepmail. Says she’s going to alert the FBI to your post #5606 above. She claims it’s a “threat to candidates.” And she’s going to discuss it with her boss and her powerful friends in the media. Just goes to show the lengths these Rudy supporters will go to attempt to shut down our right to political dissent.

Hey M.Thatcher:

I am mkjessup!!

Oh YEAH! Give 'em some more Jim!

Send that to the FBI. Bring it on, you stupid bitch.

Are there any more mkjessups here on this forum?

'I am Spartacus reference' if you don't get it.

[Politicalmom]

Area 51 is gone, too?

When did that happen?

[Miss Marple]

Actually, I have known M. Thatcher for quite a while. The information on why she isn’t bluffing would be available to anyone who read FR a lot.

[airborne]

If he’s in.

I wonder why he’s waiting.

[urbanrights]

Jim:

I’m live in NYC so I’ve had Rudy as my leader. It takes leadership to move NYC from crime-ridden to tourist-ridden. It take leadership to move one of the most liberal cities from perpetual welfare dependency towards self-sustainability. It takes leadership during times of the extreme pain and fear to move a country confidently forward.

You may not like Rudy’s positions on guns, abortion, blah blah blah, but these social issues will be debated Ad nauseam for the rest of our lives … and here’s a news flash for you: in 2016 you’ll still have your gun and Mary Jane will still be able to get an abortion. Sorry to be a spoiler, but it is the cold hard truth.

This country needs a leader to focus on what matters – our security, pride, and prosperity. Rudy’s got my vote.

[SierraWasp]

"...we are having fun while we’re doing it."

Atta boy, girl!!! That will just drive them poor uncandid candidate supporters just absolutely NUTS!!!

You just gotta make sure Duncan picks Fred as a runnin mate, or yer gonna git really, really disappointed in the out come. (grin)

[Petronski]

He approved your tagline? Or he used those words?

Post a link.

[Enosh]

I find most people entirely reasonable and pleasant to deal with.

Then why the tagline? You're making a childish fuss over nothing.

[upsdriver]

Not to worry! OMalley admitted everything!! I have it in black and white!! I am off the hook!

[hole_n_one]

I just wanna make sure that I have a good seat when the lions are let loose.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

At least you have an excuse...me, I just spend too much time freeping...

[FreeReign]

What concerns me most about Thompson, frankly, is his seeming lack of ambition. To be President—especially in times like these—one has to have a burning desire for the office. Either that, or a true sense of duty.

You come to that conclusion how? I'm not trying to flame you. I really want to know why you say that.

Certainly anybody as successful as Fred has been over the years must have a burning desire in the belly to accomplish great things.

I think Fred is getting it all together and he will announce after Memorial Day some time in early June.

[cicero's_son]

Why are you so concerned about my tagline?

Seems you’re the one making a childish fuss over nothing.

[OMalley]

What you arent going to frisk me? I might have weapons lol! at the very least her camera cord!!

[No Blue States]

LOL!

I am mkjessup!!

BTTT

[Petronski]

The information on why she isn’t bluffing would be available to anyone who read FR a lot.

The information on why her plan will induce laughter is available to anyone who has read this thread, seen the movie, and has a sense of humor.

[mkjessup]

I don't really care for your graphic ... but what you say here is absolutely true. And MThatcher knew very well you were not threatening anybody ... so if s/he does indeed "call the FBI" it will show her character in an awful light

'MThatcher' lobbed off a parting Freepmail to me basically demanding the graphic be taken down, or she would call the FBI. For that extortionist-style threat, it can stay up until Jesus comes back as far as I'm concerned.

For the record, that graphic has been used in the past right here on FR, usually on Zotted Troll threads.

The REAL Lady Thatcher would probably chuckle at that graphic, I would bet.