Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?


TOPICS: Extended News; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: Arizona; US: New York; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008election; abortion; alaska; aliens; arizona; banglist; bernardkerik; bugzapper; bugzapperinventor; bugzapperthread; byebyerinos; bzzzt; classicthread; damties; dragqueens4rudy; election2008; elections; fr; freedom; freepercide; freepersturnedtroll; freepicide; giuliani; globalwarming; gojimgo; greatzot; gungrabber; herekitty; hizzoner; homosexualagenda; howlermonkeys; howlermonkeyzot; howlinzot; hsw; immaturity; johnmccain; jrrocks; julieannie; julieanniebotsmad; lemmings; liberty; lookatmenow; massresignation; newt; newyork; newyorkcity; no; nonopus; nopiapspleez; onepercentersgone; onepercentersrule; opus; opuscentral; peachcompost; piapers; pridegoethb4; prolife; propertyrights; propiaps; rabidfringeshame; realmenofgenius; rino; rinorudy; rinos; rossperot; rudolphgiuliani; rudy; rudygiuliani; rudyhasalisp; rudyinadress; rudymcromney; rudytherino; ruhroh; runfredrun; sarahpalin; savagegotitrite; selfimmolation; senatorjohnmccain; senatormccain; socialism; socialist; springcleaning; springhousecleaning; stoprudy; stoprudy2008; suicidebymod; supo; sweepuptime; takingoutthetrash; thanksjim; themanwhosavednyc; thtoprudy; travesty; undeadthread; vikingkitties; weneedfred; wideawake; wideawakes; zap; zapper; zot; zotbelt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,701-1,7201,721-1,7401,741-1,760 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
To: mariabush; stuned_beeber

Giuliani claimed he was the “most qualified” to fight the WOT, to which I reply:

Giuliani sought and took a deferral from Vietnam to (pre)serve himself; his son is currently enrolled in a famous college of prestige.

One candidate served the United States, IIRC enlisted, for the Vietnam struggle; his son is now serving the Iraq struggle.

And Giuliani claims “best qualified”? He’s just a conceited, balding bloke.


1,721 posted on 04/22/2007 4:58:11 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
“The democrats have successfully demonized republicans as being mainly white religious bigots.”

I think you hit on something very revealing here with that comment. The democrats have successfully convinced you that conservatives are evil, and that we need to become a more “moderate” party that is accepted in the mainstream. The democrats and MSM have gotten into the heads of many conservatives by making them think we’re bigots and extremists. The daily attacks on conservatism is tough, and brutal, and I believe that many conservatives have decided it isn’t worth it anymore. In other words, they’ve decided, it’s too hot in the kitchen and they’re gonna get out.

People think by nominating a more “moderate” candidate, like Rudy, our party will become more respected, and accepted by our enemies. So they compromise their principles and back a candidate who has nothing in common with conservatives. The MSM has succeeded in wearing down a lot of conservatives who just can’t take the constant drumbeat of criticism, being told that they are religious fanatics who are out of the mainstream. After a lie is told often enough people begin to believe it.

This is one of the reasons that I believe Rudy is popular in the republican party right now. People think he will bring us a “better image”, and that our critics will back off and leave us alone. They couldn’t be more wrong. To compromise our principles is nothing more than admitting defeat and surrendering to the enemy. Conservatives need to quit drinking the liberal kool-aid, and quit worrying about the lies that come from the democrats and MSM.

For me, conservative values and principles are worth fighting for, and if it means I will continue to be demonized for who I am, so be it. I am a conservative, and I’m proud of it. I will not compromise for the sake of my enemies. They will always be my enemies—because they are liberals.

1,722 posted on 04/22/2007 5:05:43 AM PDT by dmw (Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1688 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Pardon me for jumping in, but mine is a note of concurrence. Persuasion works while dogmatism merely preaches to the choir and does little to bring others around to someone's way of thinking.

I've not yet studied the positions of the Republican hopefuls, so I don't have a choice yet. I do however visit FR regularly and am disappointed at the amount of dogmatism I'm seeing. It weakens conservatism and strengthens the liberals.

1,723 posted on 04/22/2007 5:05:48 AM PDT by LiberationIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1710 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Here’s Giuliani’s quote:

http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/30661/

“It is something I understand better than anyone else running for president.”


1,724 posted on 04/22/2007 5:06:46 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Wouldn't expect you to Jim.

So maybe we should vote for the Hildebeast? < /sarcasm>

1,725 posted on 04/22/2007 5:07:52 AM PDT by Budge (<>< Sit Nomen Domini benedictum. <><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

It would be interesting (in a train-wreck sort of way) to find those types of quotes from him and contrast them to similar quotes from history.

That one sounds like something I have heard attributed to a Roman Senator, back in the day.

I have a problem with *most* politicians, each of them (in turn) seems to compromise their values in order to ‘win’ elections.

I absolutely long for somebody to grow some ‘nads, stand up and tell it like it is.

JR posted the text of something that Fred Thompson said (on radio I think) about the disarming of America. He was blunt, and probably pissed off Rosie O’Donnel something awful, but every word that he said made me Proud to be an American.

I think that the America that I desperately want to live in is populated with people that would make me just as Proud. I see young Americans actually making a difference in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places, both more and less friendly to our interests and am humbled by their efforts. I see business owners forgoing paychecks to help an employee (who is told to keep it quiet) with a sick child, and am astonished at the self sacrifice that goes unknown.

Rudy does not even come close to representing the kind of America that I want to live in. And I don’t care who gets elected as long as I continue to ‘do the right thing’.


1,726 posted on 04/22/2007 5:08:52 AM PDT by stuned_beeber (Quit...Give up...Go home...- Vote Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“Can anyone even possibly suggest that Rudy Giuliani is conservative?”

Well Jim, Rudy’s momma seems to understand that better than some people here who continue to defend him...

“He only became a Republican after he began to get all these jobs from them. He’s definitely not a conservative Republican. He thinks he is, but he isn’t.”
— Rudy’s mother Helen

Momma knows best.


1,727 posted on 04/22/2007 5:10:11 AM PDT by dmw (Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1696 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
“If we continue to compromise our values to win against the Dems then in reality they win all the way around. We’re letting them set the standards.”

Excellent comment—and very true!

1,728 posted on 04/22/2007 5:14:40 AM PDT by dmw (Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1705 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Try to official Jefferson organization:

http://www.monticello.org/plantation/hemingscontro/hemings-jefferson_contro.html


1,729 posted on 04/22/2007 5:15:02 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: Hawk1976
Try the ofhttp://www.monticello.org/plantation/hemingscontro/hemings-jefferson_contro.htmlficial Jefferson organziation.

My point was it went from impossible to could have.

1,730 posted on 04/22/2007 5:16:03 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1092 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good on ya to get it back to the basics of what this board is all about. The Rudy "boomlet" has been interesting to observe. He has made the calculation to get out early and has succeeded in catching the traditional wing of the party flat footed to some extent.

His wave has crested and his support decreases as his principles are exposed to the general public. And the flip flopping and spinning do not help.

He has tried to make himself as the only candidate who can win a WOT. I think this arouses suspicions in those who understand that winning at anything is a team effort. And real team leaders do not call inordinate attention to themselves.

If I could trust that Rudy could return the "social issues" exclusively to the states, I might give him some consideration. But, that toothpaste is all out of the tube. Strike 1.

And based on his record in NYC, the prospects of getting illegal immigration under control is bleak. Strike 2.

Sordid personal life. Strike 3.

Yer OUT!!

1,731 posted on 04/22/2007 5:19:08 AM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I am a despised moderate.

To me, a liberal spouts “hate America, blame America, hate white people, blame white people, hate Christians, blame Christains, politics of victimhood, never take responsibility, always blame others.”

IMO this liberal philosophy is a dire threat to the future of our country, and, if the democrats get in total power, horrific laws will be passed. Carter and Clinton are already spouting this BS around the world.

This is not what Rudy is about.


1,732 posted on 04/22/2007 5:22:29 AM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
IMO this liberal philosophy is a dire threat to the future of our country, and, if the democrats get in total power, horrific laws will be passed. Carter and Clinton are already spouting this BS around the world. This is not what Rudy is about.

No tohat is exactly what that liberal is about. Rino Rudy is bad for this country.
1,733 posted on 04/22/2007 5:27:56 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

The country has weathered more, and worse than anything currently ‘on the table’. Why would you sell a short-term ‘gain’ for your soul?


1,734 posted on 04/22/2007 5:28:01 AM PDT by stuned_beeber (Quit...Give up...Go home...- Vote Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

Rudy is a liberal. Should be a Democrat.


1,735 posted on 04/22/2007 5:28:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

Rino Rudy will destroy the republican party. He has to be stopped.


1,736 posted on 04/22/2007 5:29:51 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

He once was, but changed when it was in his interests.


1,737 posted on 04/22/2007 5:30:33 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1735 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

“The fact that Rudy is affecting you and other loyalists this way tells me that for the first time in modern politics, the GOP runs the risk of allowing a true third party threat to take shape in 2008.”

A “threat” that is long overdue in my view. The question that I think is about to be answered for conservatives in very clear and stark terms is whether or not the GOP stands for anything at all other than the election of it’s members to political office regardless of ideology.


1,738 posted on 04/22/2007 5:30:56 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
This is not what Rudy is about.

I guess you know this because Rudy says so, even though you have all the evidence that proves that liberal Rudy does what Rudy wants to do when Rudy wants to do it.

1,739 posted on 04/22/2007 5:32:41 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Great post, Jim.

JulieAnnie is POISON to the Republican Party and conservatives values. We need more people like you to CONTINUE to highlight that!!!

As I have repeatedly said on here,,,,

liberal Republicans like JulieAnnie are much more dangerous than liberal Democrats,,,

because liberal Republicans BLUR THE DISTINCTION between conservatism and liberalism,,,

MAKING LIBERALISM MUCH MORE ACCEPTABLE!!

1,740 posted on 04/22/2007 5:32:59 AM PDT by stockstrader (We need a conservative nominee who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal who will DIVIDE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,701-1,7201,721-1,7401,741-1,760 ... 18,461-18,471 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson