Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home Schools Run By Well-Meaning Amateurs
NEA ^ | By Dave Arnold

Posted on 11/27/2006 7:04:44 AM PST by meandog

Schools With Good Teachers Are Best-Suited to Shape Young Minds

There's nothing like having the right person with the right experience, skills and tools to accomplish a specific task. Certain jobs are best left to the pros, such as, formal education.

There are few homeowners who can tackle every aspect of home repair. A few of us might know carpentry, plumbing and, let’s say, cementing. Others may know about electrical work, tiling and roofing. But hardly anyone can do it all.

Same goes for cars. Not many people have the skills and knowledge to perform all repairs on the family car. Even if they do, they probably don’t own the proper tools. Heck, some people have their hands full just knowing how to drive.

So, why would some parents assume they know enough about every academic subject to home-school their children? You would think that they might leave this -- the shaping of their children’s minds, careers, and futures -- to trained professionals. That is, to those who have worked steadily at their profession for 10, 20, 30 years! Teachers!

Experienced Pros

There’s nothing like having the right person with the right experience, skills and tools to accomplish a specific task. Whether it is window-washing, bricklaying or designing a space station. Certain jobs are best left to the pros. Formal education is one of those jobs.

Of course there are circumstances that might make it necessary for parents to teach their children at home. For example, if the child is severely handicapped and cannot be transported safely to a school, or is bedridden with a serious disease, or lives in such a remote area that attending a public school is near impossible.

Well-Meaning Amateurs

The number of parents who could easily send their children to public school but opt for home-schooling instead is on the increase. Several organizations have popped up on the Web to serve these wannabe teachers. These organizations are even running ads on prime time television. After viewing one advertisement, I searched a home school Web site. This site contains some statements that REALLY irritate me!

“It’s not as difficult as it looks.”

The “it” is meant to be “teaching.” Let’s face it, teaching children is difficult even for experienced professionals. Wannabes have no idea.

“What about socialization? Forget about it!”

Forget about interacting with others? Are they nuts? Socialization is an important component of getting along in life. You cannot teach it. Children should have the opportunity to interact with others their own age. Without allowing their children to mingle, trade ideas and thoughts with others, these parents are creating social misfits.

If this Web site encouraged home-schooled children to join after-school clubs at the local school, or participate in sports or other community activities, then I might feel different. Maine state laws, for example, require local school districts to allow home-schooled students to participate in their athletic programs. For this Web site to declare, “forget about it,” is bad advice.

When I worked for Wal-Mart more than 20 years ago, Sam Walton once told me: “I can teach Wal-Mart associates how to use a computer, calculator, and how to operate like retailers. But I can’t teach them how to be a teammate when they have never been part of any team.”

“Visit our online bookstore.”

Buying a history, science or math book does not mean an adult can automatically instruct others about the book’s content.

Gullible Parents

Another Web site asks for donations and posts newspaper articles pertaining to problems occurring in public schools.

It’s obvious to me that these organizations are in it for the money. They are involved in the education of children mostly in the hope of profiting at the hands of well-meaning but gullible parents.

This includes parents who home-school their children for reasons that may be linked to religious convictions. One Web site that I visited stated that the best way to combat our nation’s “ungodly” public schools was to remove students from them and teach them at home or at a Christian school.

I’m certainly not opposed to religious schools, or to anyone standing up for what they believe in. I admire anyone who has the strength to stand up against the majority. But in this case, pulling children out of a school is not the best way to fight the laws that govern our education system. No battle has ever been won by retreating!

No Training

Don’t most parents have a tough enough job teaching their children social, disciplinary and behavioral skills? They would be wise to help their children and themselves by leaving the responsibility of teaching math, science, art, writing, history, geography and other subjects to those who are knowledgeable, trained and motivated to do the best job possible.

(Dave Arnold, a member of the Illinois Education Association, is head custodian at Brownstown Elementary School in Southern Illinois.)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: allyourkids; arebelongtonea; barfarama; barfariver; condescending; cowcollegedummies; custodian; duhlookatthesource; elitists; homeschooling; libindoctrination; neapropaganda; propagandpaidforbyu; publicschool; weownyou
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 901-908 next last
To: luckystarmom

I don't have any experience with the sort of problem you describe. There are homeschool groups focused on children with learning problems. Even though you may not want to HS, it might be helpful to talk to some of those parents in your area if for no other reason than to see if they have any useful ideas.

On a lighter note, I was convinced my 9 year-old had a speech impediment because he was always mixing up "THs" and "Ss". In fact, I was convinced that I was going to have to learn to do the necessary therapy myself or hire someone. One day I saw a link to this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrYRY6kx550 . After I watched it, a light went on. My sons speak fluent German and the 9 year-old is kinda-sorta tone deaf (normal hearing, but he won't be singing professionally anytime soon). I had him watch the video, which he found hilarious, and he was instantly cured. I think he could actually tell that he was mixing up the sounds, but didn't care enough, or was too lazy, to fix it. The humor did the trick - the "speech therapy" was 100% effective, required 40 seconds, and was free.


681 posted on 11/29/2006 12:52:14 PM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

I'm pretty up on treatments for my daughter. I've been to homeschool groups, special ed groups, etc and a private evaluations done by a neuropsychologist and a learning specialist.

Thank God for the internet. I get lots of supplemental worksheets and things to help her from the homeschool groups. We do a lot at home, especially in the summer.

She has brain damage, and she is very different than a lot of other kids. She has little short-term memory, but above average long-term memory. She can't hear the difference in sounds well, and she can't pronounce things clearly.

She's a lot like an adult whose had a stroke, and in fact that is where I get a lot of information about her.

She's doing okay. She's at grade level for reading/writing/spelling, but she will probably never be a great reader/writer. I think she will always struggle (and the research backs this up).

We're just lucky that she is great at math (95%).


682 posted on 11/29/2006 1:17:00 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
We Christians have the Holy Family as our Model, no?

What Public School did Jesus attend?

683 posted on 11/29/2006 1:31:25 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: sitetest; BlackElk; Tax-chick
Actually, I was married, a father, working full-time and going to school full-time at night.

Nobody in my family has ever done anything the right, sensible, or easy way and I am a traditionalist at heart. Far be it from me to be a renegade and adopt a normative lifestyle. Folks back on the Ol'Sod and Reservation would disown, (or dissemble), me.

684 posted on 11/29/2006 1:37:59 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

LOL!


685 posted on 11/29/2006 1:44:48 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

Your daughter is fortunate to have a great family. It sounds as if, even with some brain damage, she is above average overall. That is remarkable.

Regarding the shortterm memory, have you tried teaching her memorization techniques? Does she have any trouble visualizing things? I'm planning to have my boys memorize the periodic table before long - it is quite doable with a little effort.


686 posted on 11/29/2006 1:56:33 PM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: meandog
And that means public schools are run by: "Mean-spirited, socialistic, unionized idiots"

Save money, abolish the Dept. of Education for a start. Then reduce the number of high-priced administrators by 50% and let the States run their public schools with tested, competent teachers using non-liberal texts. Will it ever happen? The RATs are back in charge and it won't happen, more's the pity, and the drop out rates will continue to increase while our kids are learning liberal junk.

687 posted on 11/29/2006 2:10:39 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; maddog
Let me try to answer your somewhat rambling post, point by point.

she will spend as many hours as necessary to complete the job without bellyaching

My daughter does not "bellyache". She loves teaching. I am the one stating my opinion on her situation, so direct your insults to me, please.

She actually has three degrees, a Masters in Math Ed and Bachs. in Math. and Poly. Sci. All that accomplished in 5 years, while playing BB at at Big 10 school, with much blood, sweat, and tears involved. She was an all Big 10 Academic recipient 4 years straight. She could have gone into virtually any profession, however she went into teaching to make a difference. She could be making 6 figures at any other career of her choosing.

She should not be paying $900 per year to a teachers' union

In Ohio, you have no choice, they take the $900 out whether you join the union or not.

The remainder of your post is to confusing, not sure how to respond. All I know is that so many of my daughter's students, and their parents have told her they never "got" math until they had her as a teacher. And for that I've very proud.

688 posted on 11/29/2006 3:07:48 PM PST by LisaMalia (GO BUCKEYES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

"Compensation" includes health/dental/retirement bennies, as well. Remember that "retirement" means 30-and-out to collect 75% of final salary--and of course, one can then double-dip by taking a contract to teach in another district.

Total Comp for teachers is generally in the upper 25% of the US scale.


689 posted on 11/29/2006 3:17:56 PM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

She's very good at visualing things. She is a visual learner. She can remember things that she sees, and she thinks in pictures more than words.

There are lots of different things online and offline that help with increasing short term memory. She's done some. That's more of a summer activity. This summer we had to work on auditory discrimination (hearing the difference in sounds) and word finding. She's doing much better in both areas. I think next summer we'll work on short term memory.


690 posted on 11/29/2006 4:19:07 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: cinives
After the burn incident I told the school if they didn't take immediate steps to physically keep the child away from my daughter I was calling the police right there from the principal's office and filing charges.

There, you did the right thing. I once moved to a different section of the town to get one of my children in a better situation. I approached the principal, and I could see that he was not sympathetic.

YOU are your child's proponent. Teachers and administrators have many students and have to make balances that you do not have to make. Unless you stand up and demand what is right for your child, your child will not fare so well.

691 posted on 11/29/2006 4:55:11 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Total Comp for teachers is generally in the upper 25% of the US scale.

Good points. However, unionized manufacturing workers were up there, too. That's why we have fewer every year.

692 posted on 11/29/2006 5:33:35 PM PST by Tax-chick ("That would be the camel's nose under the mouse.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia; Tax-chick; bornacatholic; sittnick; Oberon; ninenot; Convert from ECUSA
If you were actually trying to answer point by point my previous post, I invite anyone interested in the controversy to review my #655 and form their own opinion as to whether you succeeded. I don't think so! Here, I will show you how to do that.

That post at #655 was not at all rambling just an example of what those who were NOT dumped into public school babysitting institutions can do with actual education.

Your daughter is not bellyaching. OK, conceded that it is her mommy that does the whining for her never suspecting that boodgeum's choice of employers is the source of her misery. If she was not whining to you, you would not be whining on her behalf here.

In gummint skewels supported by the thievery of taxation, paychecks and perks and pensions are fat in exchange for minimal production. If your daughter can do better elsewhere financially, then she should flee the useless sinking ship of public education and do better elsewhere.

The late professor Russell Kirk, a conservative who could distinguish between trash posing as education and actual education in what he termed the "permanent things" (which would include mathematics) would have derided any Big Ten school as "Humungous State University" which was not a compliment (for those intellectually hamstrung by public education).

I can respect a bachelor's degree in math but never a master's degree in "math education." The first is substance (depending upon the program). The second is useless and professionally incestuous fluff (and a waste of tuition money). What on earth is "Poly. Sci"???? Political Science (Poli Sci) or some description of many sciences (Poly. Sci????) In any event, in the former instance it relates to the ability to bamboozle gullible voters into supporting tax referenda for gummint educational "needs" like fatter perks and paychecks for the gummint misedjamakashun empire to live higher on the hog at taxpayers' expense for little production.

$900 per year for union dues was strictly your daughter's choice and she made that choice when she chose union-dominated gummint skewels as her employer. It is the price she pays for the fat in her paycheck.

Your paragraph about your daughter's academic and athletic credentials is a nice expression of parental pride. On the other hand, her bachelor's degree in math is far more impressive than winning academic competitions among Big Ten athletes or (at least for academic purposes) playing BB (basketball?) on a women's team in the Big Ten.

If she hangs around gummint education as her employer for a few years, she will be making 6 figures soon enough and too soon for taxpayers well before she becomes as jaded as the system that employs her. She has hitched her occupational wagon to a falling star.

Your last paragraph is every bit as much and then some a commentary on the quality of the other math teachers at PS 666 and then some as it is on your daughter.

If you are "confused" by #655, I rest my case.

Please understand that nothing less than the abolition of gummint skeweling will suffice to guarantee our nation's future.

693 posted on 11/29/2006 7:14:23 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: meandog

my son is going into the air force as an airborn linguist


694 posted on 11/29/2006 7:19:13 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (The default mode of the heart is set for Drift.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; maddog
Please understand that nothing less than the abolition of gummint skeweling will suffice to guarantee our nation's future.

I have no idea what "gummit skewling" is, therefore, I cannot answer your post.

BTW, when my daughter is with child, hopefully soon, she will be leaving the teaching PROFESSION to be a full time Mom, until her child enters Kindergarten.

From the posts I've seen on here, her work, and other dedicated teachers will never be recognized on this site. Like I've said before, GOOD teachers are overworked, and underpaid.

I guess your solution is to JUST SHUT DOWN ALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ....and let all children be home-schooled. That solution would certainly save me tax $s.

My hope is that home-schoolers spend less time posting on here, and more time educating their children.

695 posted on 11/29/2006 8:08:13 PM PST by LisaMalia (GO BUCKEYES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I can respect a bachelor's degree in math but never a master's degree in "math education." The first is substance (depending upon the program). The second is useless and professionally incestuous fluff (and a waste of tuition money). What on earth is "Poly. Sci"???? Political Science (Poli Sci) or some description of many sciences (Poly. Sci????) In any event, in the former instance it relates to the ability to bamboozle gullible voters into supporting tax referenda for gummint educational "needs" like fatter perks and paychecks for the gummint misedjamakashun empire to live higher on the hog at taxpayers' expense for little production.

Although I agree with the gist of your points, I am going to have to take issue with a couple of points. Math Education is actually worse than education at all. It is not that they teach nothing, which would be a mere waste of time, but that they teach so much that isn't true. I knew one college professor who had just gotten her doctorate who observed that her many years of study allowed her to instruct at Universities but not Kindergarten. Thank God she did not get that instruction in Deweyism. In graduate school , I met a fellow who fancied himself a good conservative, but thanks to the brainwashing effects of Deweyism, was not philosophically a conservative at all. He didn't like me attacking Dewey,not because he could defend his case (he really couldn't without contradicting his stated conservative principles, but because he perceived it as an attack on him, who was the first from a poor family to getting a University "education." When I saw he took it personally, I laid off, but the damage had been done. The Education schools teach you to gop against your own common sense, and they are happy to peddle new theories (New Math, Whole Language) to test on large numbers of unsuspecting children. So, an Education Degree is worse than costly and time wasting "incestuous fluff," it is actually subversive.

Secondly, as a holder of a "Political Science and Economics Degree," I must say there is Poli Sci and there is Poli Sci (there is no Poly Sci, only Poly Tech). One flavor is more or less what you say, only with more statistics (which is a subset of mathematics, one of those permanent things) to help you become the next Dick Morris, but takes certain philosophical presumptions as givens. The other flavor could more rightly be called Political Philosophy, and is what I was taught in undergraduate school. There, you might start with Plato, go through Locke and The Federalist Papers and on through to Strauss and Vogelin. I hope you don't have a problem with that.
696 posted on 11/30/2006 5:53:02 AM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

vogelin-voegelin


697 posted on 11/30/2006 6:22:56 AM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: meandog; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ..
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Yet another patronizing diatribe from the left on how it is essential that they be in charge of indoctrinating children -- and this one is written by a school janitor.

698 posted on 11/30/2006 6:26:09 AM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Very quickly, home schooling, and then private schooling, will be banned. The state can not stand competition. Shortly after that, the communist dream of the state raising all children (the parents just are not qualified to form young minds you know) will be put into play.


699 posted on 11/30/2006 6:28:54 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: sittnick; BlackElk
The other flavor could more rightly be called Political Philosophy, and is what I was taught in undergraduate school. There, you might start with Plato, go through Locke and The Federalist Papers and on through to Strauss and Vogelin. I hope you don't have a problem with that.

When I was in college, we covered this in history classes. Of course, I signed up for the more interesting history classes - to loud complaints from my parents along the lines of "Is this in your major? When are you going to graduate?"

700 posted on 11/30/2006 6:36:48 AM PST by Tax-chick ("That would be the camel's nose under the mouse.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 901-908 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson