Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Govt. Tells Singles No Sex Till You're 30
ABSNews Health ^ | 10/31/06 | Brian Hartman

Posted on 11/01/2006 10:48:21 AM PST by steve-b

WASHINGTON, Oct. 31, 2006 — If you're single and in your 20s, the federal government wants you to steer clear of sex.

That's the new guidance for states under the Department of Health and Human Services' $50 million Abstinence Education Program....

"Whatever happened to conservatives that were against big government," Wagoner asks. "If this isn't a waste of taxpayer dollars, what is?"

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: genx; government; nannystate; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-252 next last
To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; tortoise; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; m18436572; ...
Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.

61 posted on 11/01/2006 11:10:16 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I guess this is what they mean by Big Government Conservatism. They will wish they had not spent that money when the Social Security trainwreck happens in a few years.


62 posted on 11/01/2006 11:10:21 AM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

I have to think if you tallied up the endless bills and societal costs for the millions of unplanned children, broken homes, and the rest of the "Great Society" that things we a lot less costly to us back when we had the brass to say, "Shame on you, unwed mother. It's not our job to clean up after you, and don't do it again!"


63 posted on 11/01/2006 11:10:33 AM PST by 50sDad (The GOP dumped Foley, the Dems kept Clinton. See the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Andonius_99
hmmmm...is this an attempt for the government to legislate morality? since when has this been a governmental concern?

Since the day that the government decided it was a good thing to teach other people's children how to put condoms on bananas and that sodomy is good.

If the gov't refuses to be neutral on the issue (ie, not talk about sex at all), better that they at least take the morally proper position.
64 posted on 11/01/2006 11:10:55 AM PST by Antoninus (Ruin a Democrat's day...help re-elect Rick Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Complete waste of time and money.


65 posted on 11/01/2006 11:11:05 AM PST by Hoodlum91 (Staying home on Nov. 7 isn't a punishment for the GOP, its a reward for the Dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
I'm only 21, no way I'm waiting another 9 years to bed a woman.

Too bad. If you did (and waited until you were married), you'd probably score yourself a magnificent bride who is free of STDs. Since you have no intention of waiting, you're rollin' the dice, my man. Hope you don't cr@p out.
66 posted on 11/01/2006 11:12:52 AM PST by Antoninus (Ruin a Democrat's day...help re-elect Rick Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

absolutely, it's immoral to kill and steal, but I didn't need the government to tell me that. The reason I haven't murdered anyone is not because it's illegal, it's because it's wrong. There are certain principles that all men should adhere to. The Ten Commandments is a good place to start. Morality is a set of principles by which one lives their life. Government is an insititution designed (originally) to protect men's rights, not to tell them how to live their lives.


67 posted on 11/01/2006 11:14:10 AM PST by Andonius_99 (They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Scarlet Pimpernel

No.


68 posted on 11/01/2006 11:14:22 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo


Ha...just get guys interested in comic books and movie/action figure collectibles while in their twenties and nature will take care of the abstinence issue...hahhahhahahaahaha...


69 posted on 11/01/2006 11:14:25 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
no sex when you're married either.

Not surprising. If one doesn't value sex enough to wait until he is married, one usually ends up in a joyless, sexless marriage--and at least one divorce.
70 posted on 11/01/2006 11:15:56 AM PST by Antoninus (Ruin a Democrat's day...help re-elect Rick Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

What if you have a girlfriend/boyfriend you love dearly, and want to have sex with them, but they both aren't married?


71 posted on 11/01/2006 11:16:42 AM PST by wastedyears ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Oberon; Trygar

Good old social conservatives believe that using the guns of the government to address social issues. They are no different in practice than the calorie and tobacco and meat nazis of the left.


72 posted on 11/01/2006 11:17:36 AM PST by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
If the gov't refuses to be neutral on the issue (ie, not talk about sex at all), better that they at least take the morally proper position.

It's better that the government take no position at all in any role involving people's daily lives. No matter what side of the issue the government is on, they're wrong because they are performing duties out of the realm of their responsibility.

73 posted on 11/01/2006 11:18:44 AM PST by Andonius_99 (They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Nanny State ping??


74 posted on 11/01/2006 11:18:55 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
LOL! The government wasting $50,000,000 of OUR money on this is the ultimate PRO-stupidity position.

You're worried about this? How much money is spent in public schools teaching kids to put condoms on bananas? Or teaching 5 year olds that Gary and Steve can be just as good parents as Joe and Cindy.

The day you bozos start complaining about the above is the day I'll start caring about federal tax dollars going toward abstinence programs. Otherwise....

YAWN
75 posted on 11/01/2006 11:19:51 AM PST by Antoninus (Ruin a Democrat's day...help re-elect Rick Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Good old social conservatives believe that using the guns of the government to address social issues. They are no different in practice than the calorie and tobacco and meat nazis of the left.

And the anti-smoking/health Nazis all first started with programs "to educate" you

76 posted on 11/01/2006 11:20:57 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

this reminds me of George Carlin's old saying about the origins of the F word.


77 posted on 11/01/2006 11:20:58 AM PST by Rakkasan1 ((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
What if you have a girlfriend/boyfriend you love dearly, and want to have sex with them, but they both aren't married?

Is this question for real. GET MARRIED!
78 posted on 11/01/2006 11:21:34 AM PST by Antoninus (Ruin a Democrat's day...help re-elect Rick Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

It was half serious.

I don't have a girlfriend =/


79 posted on 11/01/2006 11:23:18 AM PST by wastedyears ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I suppoose $50,000,000 is no big deal to someone for whom "roughing it" means cutting back one's Hamptons vacation, but it is a big deal to normal people.


80 posted on 11/01/2006 11:23:23 AM PST by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson