Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2006 9:36:24 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: SirLinksalot

Good for him.


2 posted on 05/22/2006 9:40:50 AM PDT by ClancyJ (To cause a democrat to win is the most effective way to destroy this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The angry star was actually the first choice of Dr. Robert Lomas (the intellectual who inspired the Robert Langdon character) to play him. Tom Hanks plays Langdon in the film

What??? This was a joke, right? As if Mel Gibson would ever think of being in this movie! Why that is just downright insulting to even suggest him for the role. The Da Vinci code is from the pit of hell.

3 posted on 05/22/2006 9:40:58 AM PDT by micho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The angry star was actually the first choice of Dr. Robert Lomas (the intellectual who inspired the Robert Langdon character) to play him. Tom Hanks plays Langdon in the film

What??? This was a joke, right? As if Mel Gibson would ever think of being in this movie! Why that is just downright insulting to even suggest him for the role. The Da Vinci code is from the pit of hell.

4 posted on 05/22/2006 9:41:46 AM PDT by micho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

A friend of mine saw it and said it's a fictionalized mystery.


5 posted on 05/22/2006 9:41:55 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
So do we like him now?
6 posted on 05/22/2006 9:41:58 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Should kept his mouth shut about the theologicial content and told 'em (truthfully) "Its boring."

That would do more that anything to kill it off.


8 posted on 05/22/2006 9:43:42 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"I'm not angry, per se, that it refutes everything I hold sacred, the foundations of my beliefs. The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories in a way that will appear plausible to some."

I think that is one of the most cogent one-line explanations for the problem with this work of fiction... well done!

9 posted on 05/22/2006 9:44:24 AM PDT by pgyanke (Christ has a tolerance for sinners; liberals have a tolerance for sin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Oh boo hoo. Boot’s on the other foot now is it Mel?

Didn’t have much problem taking liberties with the truth in Braveheart or The Patriot did you?

What a hypocrite.


10 posted on 05/22/2006 9:44:26 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

White Danny Glover....


11 posted on 05/22/2006 9:45:22 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Conservatism is moderate, it is the center, it is the middle of the road)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

They're already licking their chops over Davinci II: Angels and Demons. I can just anticipate the hype over this one.

My husband and I saw it yesterday and as a fictional mystery, we enjoyed it, but we know it is fiction. Wonder how many won't know that?


12 posted on 05/22/2006 9:45:39 AM PDT by Ptaz (Take Personal Responsibility--it's not fun, but it's the right thing to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"The Passion of the Christ" star has been outraged...

Mel did not "star" in "The Passion of the Christ."

He produced and directed it.

His hands appeared in a single scene, but that is all.

13 posted on 05/22/2006 9:46:07 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"I'm not angry, per se, that it refutes everything I hold sacred, the foundations of my beliefs. The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories in a way that will appear plausible to some."

I am astonished beyond belief that someone in the film industry doesn't comprehend that fiction relies on a smattering of factual elements to create a good story. Am I supposed to believe that EVERY book and EVERY movie is factual!!?? Am I supposed to believe that Scotty really did beam people up and that Star Wars and Harry Potter are based solely on FACT!!!???

Give me a freakin' break!!!!!
17 posted on 05/22/2006 9:51:53 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

There are a lot of words that can describe the Da Vinci Code. Two of them are "long" and "boring."


18 posted on 05/22/2006 9:51:59 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

"Gibson says, "What worries me is that people will take this as fact. "

What? Was he talking about his film, The Patriot? Get over yourself, Mel!


20 posted on 05/22/2006 9:52:25 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HairOfTheDog
Hmmmm, OK, so now Mel is a "good guy" again.
22 posted on 05/22/2006 9:54:15 AM PDT by ecurbh (Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Funny how criticizing The last Temptation of Christ was perfectly the Right thing to do, but say just one bad thing about the Da Cinci Code, and tons of "It just fiction so get over it" people come out and call you overly intolerant.

Well I say Good for You Mel.
45 posted on 05/22/2006 10:02:55 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

ping


47 posted on 05/22/2006 10:03:34 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction
but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories
in a way that will appear plausible to some."


48 posted on 05/22/2006 10:03:36 AM PDT by mikrofon (You mean .... you mean the people in this films were not REAL?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
This movie is not unlike Egypt's TV series on "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion."

It's a conspiracy theory designed to foment hatred.

75 posted on 05/22/2006 10:22:50 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories in a way that will appear plausible to some."

Umm, isn't this the aim of most fiction...to seem plausible to everyone?

121 posted on 05/22/2006 10:54:41 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson