Skip to comments.
Mel Gibson Slams Da Vinci Code
NewsMax ^
| 05/22/2006
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 05/22/2006 9:36:23 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
Monday, May 22, 2006 12:44 a.m. EDT Mel Gibson Slams 'Da Vinci Code'
Catholic actor Mel Gibson has slammed "The Da Vinci Code" book and movie for attacking the beliefs that he holds sacred, World Entertainment Network reported.
"The Passion of the Christ" star has been outraged about the thriller's controversial plot concerning Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. [Editor's Note: Get NewsMax's special report "The Da Vinci Con" FREE with Ann Coulter's book, "Godless" CLICK HERE NOW!]
Gibson says, "What worries me is that people will take this as fact.
"I'm not angry, per se, that it refutes everything I hold sacred, the foundations of my beliefs. The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories in a way that will appear plausible to some."
The angry star was actually the first choice of Dr. Robert Lomas (the intellectual who inspired the Robert Langdon character) to play him. Tom Hanks plays Langdon in the film
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blasphemy; catholicinsecurity; davincicode; evil; hypocrit; melgibson; ohtheirony; potandkettle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-382 next last
To: ranger13008
ut the movie just made over $225 billion worldwide in its first weekend....Incorrect. A few zeros off.
41
posted on
05/22/2006 10:01:48 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
("A real decision is measured by the fact that you have taken a new action"... Tony Robbins)
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: Kenny Bunkport
He's pandered to a segment of people who are willing to believe the worst about religious institutions, and about God Himself, which, sadly, is a very large number of people in our society. to which, already have a prenotion and want to have a viable excuse to use this film as a scapegoat to enter heaven on judgement day,... But God, the movie was very convincing....not my fault...
43
posted on
05/22/2006 10:02:11 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Mr. Franklin, what form of customes did you create in Tiajunna? A beeber, Madam, if you can stune it)
To: RushCrush
44
posted on
05/22/2006 10:02:51 AM PDT
by
zook
To: SirLinksalot
Funny how criticizing The last Temptation of Christ was perfectly the Right thing to do, but say just one bad thing about the Da Cinci Code, and tons of "It just fiction so get over it" people come out and call you overly intolerant.
Well I say Good for You Mel.
To: FostersExport
Yes, next question? I know in the Patriot all the names were made up. Did Mel use real names in Braveheart? Certainly, Mel did the British no favors in his portrayal, but the British were quite the imperialistic bastards in their day.
To: ALOHA RONNIE
47
posted on
05/22/2006 10:03:34 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: SirLinksalot
"The Da Vinci Code is an admitted work of fiction
but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories
in a way that will appear plausible to some."
48
posted on
05/22/2006 10:03:36 AM PDT
by
mikrofon
(You mean .... you mean the people in this films were not REAL?!)
To: sarasota
What about a mystery that postulates that Lincoln was assassinated by Booth after Booth got wind that Lincoln was about to use Sherman's army to drive Congress out of town and to set himself up as emperor? More to the point wehat about a mystery that involves the asssination of a Muslim scholar who has evidence that the Koran was a fabrication of the Arab generals who boiled out of the desert in 640 and fell on the Greeks and the Persians, that Mohammed never really existed or was the addled figurehead of these warriors. Yep, I can see boths being made into major motion pictures.
49
posted on
05/22/2006 10:04:01 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Always Right
I don't think any British officer ever ordered innocents to be burned alive inside a church. I mean, it made for a good movie, but seriously!
50
posted on
05/22/2006 10:04:34 AM PDT
by
zook
To: ranger13008
but the movie just made over $225 billion worldwideApparently everybody on earth has seen it at least 3 times.
(Except for me. I guess I'm really going to be out of it on the cocktail party circuit.)
To: Rightwing Canuck
If you add the 77 million domestic the total reaches @ $225 million. The $147 is the foreign box-office.
To: ranger13008
How does "$225 billion" strike you ? In a single weekend... That movie ticket prices are too high.
53
posted on
05/22/2006 10:05:16 AM PDT
by
luvbach1
(More true now than ever: Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
To: pgyanke
...admitted work of fiction but it cleverly weaves fact into maverick theories in a way that will appear plausible to some." Kinda like the DNC press releases........
54
posted on
05/22/2006 10:05:47 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
To: Kenny Bunkport
I can't find it now, but there was an article last week saying how many beleived that what was in the movie was true. In the US it was a fairly large number, and I believe in the UK it was 2 out of 3. That's alot of people decieved.
But of course, the overriding right to be entertained trumps everything! ;)
susie
55
posted on
05/22/2006 10:06:22 AM PDT
by
brytlea
(amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
To: Zavien Doombringer
Precisely. A movie which takes Jesus down a few pegs appeals to those who wish to feel comfortable in their unbelief.
56
posted on
05/22/2006 10:07:46 AM PDT
by
Kenny Bunkport
(As the Democrat Party becomes more evil, the GOP becomes more stupid. What's a voter to do?)
To: ranger13008
Even if everything in the movie were true would it really change anything?
To me Yes....However, I am interested in your comment. In your opinion, how does Christ having children support His Divine nature?
57
posted on
05/22/2006 10:08:18 AM PDT
by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: zook
I don't think any British officer ever ordered innocents to be burned alive inside a church. I mean, it made for a good movie, but seriously! Yeah, Gibson probably took his artistic liberties a bit too far there.
To: sarasota
A friend of mine saw it and said it's a fictionalized mystery.That's what Satan wanted him to think... (sarcasm off)
59
posted on
05/22/2006 10:11:25 AM PDT
by
cryptical
(Wretched excess is just barely enough.)
To: Kenny Bunkport
Dan Brown has spun his book as "fiction based on fact" to appeal to people who have no knowledge of history and who suspect that the world is run by secret societiesIndeed. We laugh at stupid peasants in backward societies who believe in superstitions and wild conspiracy theories. Books have been written about that and sold as non-fiction, even if they were fiction (Kosinski's Painted Bird, for example.)
But the stupid, conspiracy and superstition believing peasants are all around us in a modern society, educated urbanized people all of them. Educated? The promotion and defense of this illiterate piece crap on this forum has been shameful!
60
posted on
05/22/2006 10:11:29 AM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-382 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson