Homo sapiens: 'Out of Africa' three distinct times, new analysis shows
Posted on 02/10/2006 2:54:05 AM PST by PatrickHenry
A new, more robust analysis of recently derived human gene trees by Alan R. Templeton, Ph.D, of Washington University in St Louis, shows three distinct major waves of human migration out of Africa instead of just two, and statistically refutes — strongly — the 'Out of Africa' replacement theory.
That theory holds that populations of Homo sapiens left Africa 100,000 years ago and wiped out existing populations of humans. Templeton has shown that the African populations interbred with the Eurasian populations — thus, making love, not war.
"The 'Out of Africa' replacement theory has always been a big controversy," Templeton said. "I set up a null hypothesis and the program rejected that hypothesis using the new data with a probability level of 10 to the minus 17th. In science, you don't get any more conclusive than that. It says that the hypothesis of no interbreeding is so grossly incompatible with the data, that you can reject it."
Templeton's analysis is considered to be the only definitive statistical test to refute the theory, dominant in human evolution science for more than two decades.
"Not only does the new analysis reject the theory, it demolishes it," Templeton said.
Templeton published his results in the Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 2005.
A trellis, not a tree
He used a computer program called GEODIS, which he created in 1995 and later modified with the help of David Posada, Ph.D., and Keith Crandall, Ph.D. at Brigham Young University, to determine genetic relationships among and within populations based on an examination of specific haplotypes, clusters of genes that are inherited as a unit.
In 2002, Templeton analyzed ten different haplotype trees and performed phylogeographic analyses that reconstructed the history of the species through space and time.
Three years later, he had 25 regions to analyze and the data provided molecular evidence of a third migration, this one the oldest, back to 1.9 million years ago.
"This time frame corresponds extremely well with the fossil record, which shows Homo erectus expanding out of Africa then," Templeton said.
Another novel find is that populations of Homo erectus in Eurasia had recurrent genetic interchange with African populations 1.5 million years ago, much earlier than previously thought, and that these populations persisted instead of going extinct, which some human evolution researchers thought had occurred.
The new data confirm an expansion out of Africa to 700,000 years ago that was detected in the 2002 analysis.
"Both (the 1.9 million and 700,000 year) expansions coincide with recent paleoclimatic data that indicate periods of very high rainfall in eastern Africa, making what is now the Sahara Desert a savannah," Templeton said. "That makes the timing very amenable for movements of large populations through the area."
Templeton said that the fossil record indicates a significant change in brain size for modern humans at 700,000 years ago as well as the adaptation and expansion of a new stone tool culture first found in Africa and later at 700,000 years expanded throughout Eurasia.
"By the time you're done with this phase you can be 99 percent confident that there was recurrent genetic interchange between African and Eurasian populations," he said. "So the idea of pure, distinct races in humans does not exist. We humans don't have a tree relationship, rather a trellis. We're intertwined."
Baptism for the dead is done on the basis of written records, not DNA.
Your DNA that would be used for research, would not ever be used for any other purpose.
Now, if you have a relative who joined the church, they would be interested in your Family History.
Well, to start with for a long time the only “color” found in human pigment was black. Last year they reported that some have red pigment.
|
|
|||
Gods |
Note: this topic is from AGES AGO.This re-ping is just for updating purposes, also it's interesting (and was posted by Patrick Henry). |
||
|
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
Why can't it be more like war and rape like was the norm in warfare before we got civilized?
Homo erectus = Neaderthals+Peking so how does that flesh out??
and has any one asked Milford Wolpoff about the whole thing.
Homo erectus = Neaderthals+Peking so how does that flesh out??
and has any one asked Milford Wolpoff about the whole thing.
Oooops, wrong poster...sorry.
I was senting the last one to PatrickHenry
ping me.
Vaquero
oh Crap.....I thought PatrickHenry was back....I asked him to re ping me....shoot.
nevermind.......
Precisely: the “interbreeding” could very well have been the result of rapine and pillaging.
It worked for the Romans.....
More than likely one set of humans killed the men folk - ATE THEM - and raped the females (all ages) and kept the ones that got pregnant and killed AND ATE the rest.
A skull that rewrites the history of man
One of the skulls discovered in Georgia, which are believed to date back 1.8 million years
A skull from one of the five early Homo erectus skeletons unearthed at Dmanisi in Georgia. They are the earliest human remains to be discovered outside Africa.
Supervolcano eruption 70,000 years ago .... Tomu or Tormu ... google it.
Thanks BGHater!
:’)
Wait a second... we’re civilized?!? ;’)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
